A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Soverignty Protection Fighter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th 04, 04:35 AM
Charles Talleyrand
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soverignty Protection Fighter

Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the
planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5
Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WHAT IS A SOVERIGNTY PROTECTION FIGHTER?

It's a fighter that is available to political leaders to contest challenges to
the nations borders. They are not expected to engage in combat in the normal
course of operations.

WHAT ARE EXAMPLES?

During the cold war when Russian Bears would come close to Alaska, we
would send up fighters not to shoot them down, but just to remind them that
we protect Alaskan airspace.

Sometimes the pricipal purpose of the fighter is sovergnity protection. No
one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air
combat. Instead we expect them to be available to political leaders and to
enforce border security and sometimes anti-drug operations.

WHAT ARE THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

They should be able to catch opposing aircraft, typically at high-subsonic
speed and high altitude. At minimum there are lots of business aircraft that
can do Mach 0.9 at 50,000 feet.

They should be able to find the target aircraft. A radar with moderate range is
needed. Typically this radar will not face enemy jamming.

They should have reasonable endurance. Escorting an target aircraft
might require a half-hour or more beyond the flight to and from the
intercept point.

They should have a weapons system. Short range weapons systems are fine.
Guns are fine.

And ABOVE ALL ELSE, they should be low in total systems cost.


  #2  
Old July 17th 04, 05:20 PM
Urban Fredriksson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Charles Talleyrand wrote:

No
one expects [...] or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air
combat.


Especially since they don't have any.
--
Urban Fredriksson
Military aviation; Swedish military aviation
http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/
Weblog http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/avblog.html
  #3  
Old July 17th 04, 07:46 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message
...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests

that among the
planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a

Mig-21 or Q-5
Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available).


Neither seem a good choice being short on range , lacking room
for a good radar and having high operational costs. These are
after all 1960's era aircraft

The Saab Grippen or Mig-29 would seem a better choice.

Keith


  #4  
Old July 17th 04, 10:40 PM
TJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the
planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5
Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available).


Sometimes the pricipal purpose of the fighter is sovergnity protection. No
one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air
combat. Instead we expect them to be available to political leaders and to
enforce border security and sometimes anti-drug operations.


No one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to

engage in air-air combat.

Why not? The Royal New Zealand Air Force has retired all its A-4s and
MB339s without replacement. They have no fighter capability. Brazil
has postponed its new fighter choice but listed the F-16, Gripen,
Mirage 2000, Su-35 and MiG-29 as candidates. Due to cost it is likely
that they will either lease or buy used aircraft. The Swiss train
regularly in air combat. Due to restricted airspace they use the North
Sea trainiing ranges supported by British Aerospace at RAF Waddington,
Lincolnshire in England. The Swiss use F/A-18s and F-5s.

http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/hangar/1999/swiss/acmi.htm

Picture of Swiss Hornet fitted out with range instrumentation pod:

http://www.warplane.co.uk/Nomad/n36.jpg
  #5  
Old July 19th 04, 02:45 AM
DJFawcett26
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job?

Possibly the upcoming military version of the Javelin being developed by ATG.
  #7  
Old July 19th 04, 08:00 AM
Ian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
(DJFawcett26) wrote in message

...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job?


Possibly the upcoming military version of the Javelin being developed by

ATG.

ATG Javelin photo:
http://www.twocommas.ca/collections/...front-left.jpg

Personally, I'd just wait for the EADS Mako...

Rob


Has the Mako flown yet? Just remembering the hoohaa raised in the UK when
the AJT was being decided. Obviously the Hawk 128 won, but a lot of people
wanted the Mako above the italian option..


  #8  
Old July 19th 04, 08:16 AM
Eunometic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job? My gut suggests that among the
planes a nation might be able to buy the best might be something like a Mig-21 or Q-5
Fantan with western radar or an F-5 (if they are available).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WHAT IS A SOVERIGNTY PROTECTION FIGHTER?


It's sole purpose would seem to be the interception and shooting down
of airliners that have been hijacked and are about to dive into the
whitehouse. Clearly there is a need thousands of these fighters to
carry out millions of interceptions. They will need to be shipped in
pork barells 6 at a time to have maximim effect.

Alternatively a Sopwith camel could be used to patrol the Rio Grande.
Opperation wet back II anyone?

"Soverignty Protection Fighter" is worth less than one world war I
string bag if the "administration" is the real threat to Soveringty
and isn't interested in stopping illegal immigration or denying those
illegal all manner of benefits from education, medical care and
subsidised housing or deportation.





It's a fighter that is available to political leaders to contest challenges to
the nations borders. They are not expected to engage in combat in the normal
course of operations.

WHAT ARE EXAMPLES?

During the cold war when Russian Bears would come close to Alaska, we
would send up fighters not to shoot them down, but just to remind them that
we protect Alaskan airspace.


The Bear rear gunner used to laugh at Torando pilots: with its drop
tanks on the Tornado a Bear could out accelerate a Tornado and roll
away while the Tornado pilot had to light up his afterburners to keep
up.

A "SPF" would be a similar laughing stock if confronted with a
Backfire or Blackjack.



Sometimes the pricipal purpose of the fighter is sovergnity protection. No
one expectsBrazil, Switzerland, or New Zealand's fighters to engage in air-air
combat. Instead we expect them to be available to political leaders and to
enforce border security and sometimes anti-drug operations.

WHAT ARE THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

They should be able to catch opposing aircraft, typically at high-subsonic
speed and high altitude. At minimum there are lots of business aircraft that
can do Mach 0.9 at 50,000 feet.

They should be able to find the target aircraft. A radar with moderate range is
needed. Typically this radar will not face enemy jamming.

They should have reasonable endurance. Escorting an target aircraft
might require a half-hour or more beyond the flight to and from the
intercept point.

They should have a weapons system. Short range weapons systems are fine.
Guns are fine.

And ABOVE ALL ELSE, they should be low in total systems cost.

  #9  
Old July 19th 04, 10:34 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ian" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
(DJFawcett26) wrote in message

...
Can someone comment on the best aircraft for this job?

Possibly the upcoming military version of the Javelin being developed by

ATG.

ATG Javelin photo:
http://www.twocommas.ca/collections/...front-left.jpg

Personally, I'd just wait for the EADS Mako...

Rob


Has the Mako flown yet? Just remembering the hoohaa raised in the UK when
the AJT was being decided. Obviously the Hawk 128 won, but a lot of people
wanted the Mako above the italian option..



Not yet, but coming up in a year or two. A photo:
http://www.airforce-technology.com/p...ads_mako_6.jpg

Rob
  #10  
Old July 19th 04, 02:17 PM
DJFawcett26
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Personally, I'd just wait for the EADS Mako...

You will be waiting a long time, the program is dead
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
No More New Fighter Aircraft Types? W. D. Allen Sr. Military Aviation 120 April 18th 04 07:08 AM
A-4 / A-7 Question Tank Fixer Military Aviation 135 October 25th 03 03:59 AM
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? lihakirves Military Aviation 1 July 5th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.