If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
At what point does one normally set flaps before take-off? I've been
doing it only when aligning with the runway, on the theory that extending flaps prior to that would just make me more vulnerable to wind while on the taxiway or at the gate. Similarly, I retract the flaps completely as soon as I'm completely on the runway for landing, so that the wind doesn't push me around. Is this the correct way to do it? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
I generally extend flaps as I approach the holding point, stops the wind grabbing you and better visibility all round (well for the Cessna) As for retracting, I use them for a drag advantage to slow the aircraft down and retract when I have full nosewheel steering control of the aircraft! This is real world, as for simulator.. just throw them down during the taxy! Generally, airline drivers have flaps set prior to taxy after pushback! Jad Mxsmanic wrote: At what point does one normally set flaps before take-off? I've been doing it only when aligning with the runway, on the theory that extending flaps prior to that would just make me more vulnerable to wind while on the taxiway or at the gate. Similarly, I retract the flaps completely as soon as I'm completely on the runway for landing, so that the wind doesn't push me around. Is this the correct way to do it? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... At what point does one normally set flaps before take-off? I've been doing it only when aligning with the runway, on the theory that extending flaps prior to that would just make me more vulnerable to wind while on the taxiway or at the gate. Similarly, I retract the flaps completely as soon as I'm completely on the runway for landing, so that the wind doesn't push me around. Is this the correct way to do it? It depends on the airplane and the pilot. Personally, for the airplane I am flying the most, I have the flaps down from preflight to takeoff. This is because the airplane requires flaps for landings and takeoffs, there is only one "flaps down" setting, and I like having the flaps down during the preflight as well. So I put the flaps down before a landing, and they don't come up until after the next takeoff. For Cessnas, which generally don't require flaps for takeoff, it's a different matter. I lower the flaps for the preflight inspection so that I can properly inspect the flap mechanisms, but then retract them after engine start and before taxiing. Certain takeoffs may dictate lowering them again prior to takeoff, which I do as part of my pre-takeoff checks, which include reviewing the takeoff procedure checklist (flap setting is listed with the checklist items for the takeoff itself). Some pilots retract the flaps as soon as they touchdown, with the theory that this will enhance their braking. However, IMHO this ignores the fact that there is more aerodynamic braking with the flaps down early in the roll out, and by the time the extra drag is negligible, so is any additional lift the flaps might be generating. It also ignores the hazard in some airplanes of accidently retracting the landing gear rather than the flaps. Other airplanes run the gamut in terms of what's required or desired operationally, and of course each pilot may have their own preferences as well. IMHO, since you're not actually flying an airplane, I wouldn't worry about it. Put the flaps down whenever you want. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Peter Duniho writes:
I lower the flaps for the preflight inspection so that I can properly inspect the flap mechanisms, but then retract them after engine start and before taxiing. Doesn't flap movement require engine power? IMHO, since you're not actually flying an airplane, I wouldn't worry about it. Put the flaps down whenever you want. The idea is to try to approach real life. Additionally, many things are simulated. If adjusting flaps has a bad effect in real life, there's a good chance that it has a bad effect in simulation as well. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Some airplanes use electric motors to move the flaps, some
use engine driven hydraulic pumps. Some use hand cranks and some use a lever. Most light aircraft use either a mechanical human powered lever or crank or electric motors that will run on the battery. Heavier airplanes, over 12,000 pounds often use hydraulics. Sometimes the hydraulic pumps are electric powered, but engine driven pumps are common. "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... | Peter Duniho writes: | | I lower the flaps for the preflight inspection so that I | can properly inspect the flap mechanisms, but then retract them after engine | start and before taxiing. | | Doesn't flap movement require engine power? | | IMHO, since you're not actually flying an airplane, I wouldn't worry about | it. Put the flaps down whenever you want. | | The idea is to try to approach real life. Additionally, many things | are simulated. If adjusting flaps has a bad effect in real life, | there's a good chance that it has a bad effect in simulation as well. | | -- | Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Mxsmanic wrote:
Peter Duniho writes: I lower the flaps for the preflight inspection so that I can properly inspect the flap mechanisms, but then retract them after engine start and before taxiing. Doesn't flap movement require engine power? Depends on the aircraft. Some planes they are purely mechanical from the flap handle in the cockpit. In others they are electric. On my plane they are hydraulic, which is run from the engine if it is running but has a backup "wobble pump" which I can use to retract them on the ground if I forget to do so before shutdown. My plane specs flaps up or 1/2 for takeoff (short field takeoff done with 1/2). Landing can be done with any setting of flaps. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Ron Natalie writes:
Depends on the aircraft. Some planes they are purely mechanical from the flap handle in the cockpit. I'm surprised that a small handle in the cockpit would provide enough leverage to lower flaps. Isn't there are a lot of aerodynamic pressure to overcome against them (at least if they are lowered in flight)? I'm always surprised by how much is still mechanically linked in aircraft. I'm not necessarily saying that's bad--simple is reliable, generally speaking--but somehow I don't picture control surfaces as something that one could easily move without assistance. I suppose small planes are lighter than they appear, and just because the wings look relatively big doesn't mean that they are heavy or hard to move. My plane specs flaps up or 1/2 for takeoff (short field takeoff done with 1/2). Landing can be done with any setting of flaps. I've always been landing with flaps down completely, and usually taking off with some flaps, as I had read that this was necessary (and I had seen accident reports about pilots who crashed because they took off without first lowering flaps). But from what you and others here say it sounds like I have considerably more discretion in whether or not I lower flaps for both operations. Are there good reasons to lower flaps in flight, outside take-off and landing? I've thought that they would be useful for increasing drag and lowering airspeed, but since they apparently cannot be used at high speeds I guess this isn't a good idea. Sometimes if one must descend rapidly just idling the throttle doesn't seem to be enough to stay below hazardous speeds, and few aircraft seem to have speed brakes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Natalie writes: Depends on the aircraft. Some planes they are purely mechanical from the flap handle in the cockpit. I'm surprised that a small handle in the cockpit would provide enough leverage to lower flaps. Who said the handle is small? Some of these "handles" are 2 - 3 feet long. Margy Isn't there are a lot of aerodynamic pressure to overcome against them (at least if they are lowered in flight)? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Every airplane with flaps has speed limits with flaps
extended. If there is a positive stop, they may have a series of allowable speeds. The same sort of limits apply to landing gear extension and operation with the gear extended. In some airplanes the gear is not to be extended at speeds above a certain speed because the motor and linkage is not strong enough, but once fully extended and lock down, the airplane can be flown at a higher speed. Some airplanes can have the gear extended at very high speed in an emergency, but then the gear doors may be damaged and require replacement or adjustment before the next flight. Real airplanes and the simulators that exactly duplicate a particular airplane are flown by the identical procedures. Table-top PC "simulators" are more properly known as training devices and they mimic some generic airplanes. A real simulator costs more than the airplane it is duplicating, a Beechjet or Boeing simulator can cost $8-10 million dollars or more. It is worthwhile because it doesn't burn several thousand pounds of fuel per hour, can be run nearly 24/7, rarely kills anyone and it is a safe place to do things that can't be done safely in a real airplane. Also, it allows the airplane to be out earning revenue. Even a PC based training device is very useful for learning and practicing procedures, but you get what you pay for. A King Air trainer with out full visual and motion still allows learning all the systems and practicing the various emergency and abnormal procedures. "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... | Ron Natalie writes: | | Depends on the aircraft. Some planes they are purely mechanical from | the flap handle in the cockpit. | | I'm surprised that a small handle in the cockpit would provide enough | leverage to lower flaps. Isn't there are a lot of aerodynamic | pressure to overcome against them (at least if they are lowered in | flight)? | | I'm always surprised by how much is still mechanically linked in | aircraft. I'm not necessarily saying that's bad--simple is reliable, | generally speaking--but somehow I don't picture control surfaces as | something that one could easily move without assistance. I suppose | small planes are lighter than they appear, and just because the wings | look relatively big doesn't mean that they are heavy or hard to move. | | My plane specs flaps up or 1/2 for takeoff (short field takeoff done | with 1/2). Landing can be done with any setting of flaps. | | I've always been landing with flaps down completely, and usually | taking off with some flaps, as I had read that this was necessary (and | I had seen accident reports about pilots who crashed because they took | off without first lowering flaps). But from what you and others here | say it sounds like I have considerably more discretion in whether or | not I lower flaps for both operations. | | Are there good reasons to lower flaps in flight, outside take-off and | landing? I've thought that they would be useful for increasing drag | and lowering airspeed, but since they apparently cannot be used at | high speeds I guess this isn't a good idea. Sometimes if one must | descend rapidly just idling the throttle doesn't seem to be enough to | stay below hazardous speeds, and few aircraft seem to have speed | brakes. | | -- | Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Mxsmanic" ... wrote in message ... I'm surprised that a small handle in the cockpit would provide enough leverage to lower flaps. Isn't there are a lot of aerodynamic pressure to overcome against them (at least if they are lowered in flight)? In a Beech Sundowner the handle is maybe 18" long and looks like a big version of a parking brake lever that you might see in a car. There's more resistance the higher your airspeed, but it pulls up easily enough below the max flaps speed. Also, it's good to have a bit of mechanical feedback like that in case you don't have your wits about you and try to pull flaps at too high an airspeed. Are there good reasons to lower flaps in flight, outside take-off and landing? I've thought that they would be useful for increasing drag and lowering airspeed, but since they apparently cannot be used at high speeds I guess this isn't a good idea. Sometimes if one must descend rapidly just idling the throttle doesn't seem to be enough to stay below hazardous speeds, and few aircraft seem to have speed brakes. Flaps have two main effects, they increase drag, like you said, and they also increase lift and reduce your stall speed. These two effects can be useful at different times. For example, if your wing is on fire and you want to descend quickly, you lower the flaps and descend at Vfe (max speed with flaps extended, top of the white arc). It's an interesting exercise the first time you practice it, with the ground filling up your windscreen like that and all. Another use is when you simply want to fly slower, such as when you're in the traffic pattern and want to avoid getting too close to someone in front of you. You can slow down without flaps, but using them keeps you farther from a stall, which is a good thing at pattern altitude. I'm sure more experienced pilots can give more interesting ways to use flaps in normal flight, but those are the ones that come to mind just now. Tom Young |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|