|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 7th 08, 01:43 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Conventional v tricycle gear
Other than the 'holier than thou' aspects of taildraggers and their
pilots, what are their real advantages? Has it to do with prop clearance on unimproved fields, or fatter mains being better in that same environment? Does anyone know if, with the same level of experience pilots, they have a better or worse accident record when compared to airplanes of the same general size that have the tailwheel under the engine? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tricycle gear Cub? | Ken Finney | Piloting | 8 | September 17th 07 11:43 PM |
| Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
| Tricycle Midget Thought | Dick | Home Built | 4 | March 26th 04 11:12 PM |
| WarPac War Plans-any conventional? | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 1 | December 8th 03 09:29 PM |
| tricycle undercarriage | G. Stewart | Military Aviation | 26 | December 3rd 03 02:10 AM |
Threaded Mode