|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
March 13th 06, 02:48 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
ASW20A and Cirrus
At 14:42 13 March 2006, Bert Willing wrote:
I rather look at measurements than at manufacturer claims... So do I, the purpose of the ~ [about] sign. However, I think that DG are usually pretty good bout that stuff, and 41.25 is too low for a 17m flapped glider JR 
|
|
#22
March 13th 06, 02:48 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
|
ASW20A and Cirrus
At 14:42 13 March 2006, Bert Willing wrote:
I rather look at measurements than at manufacturer claims... So do I, the purpose of the ~ [about] sign. However, I think that DG are usually pretty good bout that stuff, and 41.25 is too low for a 17m flapped glider JR
|
|
#23
March 13th 06, 03:17 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
|
ASW20A and Cirrus
I didn't meant 41.25. The ASW20 has 41.3 in 15m, and 43 in 16.6m. It took
the Ventus to go to 17.6m to get 46, so 45 is a big claim for a DG200/17. The ASW20 has an index of 110 with 15m, and so has the DG200 with 17m. "Jono Richards" wrote in message ... At 14:42 13 March 2006, Bert Willing wrote: I rather look at measurements than at manufacturer claims... So do I, the purpose of the ~ [about] sign. However, I think that DG are usually pretty good bout that stuff, and 41.25 is too low for a 17m flapped glider JR
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASW20A and Cirrus | Jeff Runciman | Soaring | 4 | March 12th 06 05:06 PM |
Linear Mode
