![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Millions already know that Britain is in the hands of terrorists who
respect no law. Britain invaded Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq. In the latter case, it did so in violation of a United Nations resolution, no less. The Secretary General of the UN declared the invasion "illegal". In the face of such massive crime - with MILLIONS of people killed or made homeless - the crimes committed by the British "Establishment" at home seem to pale into insignificance. However, charity begins at home. That the government of murderers is uncharitable to its own population is just a sign of how they behave in the world at large. THEY PRACTISE SAVAGERY UPON THEIR OWN PEOPLE. Maurice Kirk, the Flying Vet, is a case in point. He has been victimised by corrupt police and lawyers for decades. He was taken to court on trumped-up charges on ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY occasions, and won all his cases. He was kidnapped by the police early in 2009, and has been in prison since. He was unable to spend Christmas or New Year with his family. The "charge" is that a lump of metal - used on film as a prop, because it looks like a gun - is "capable of firing one or more projectiles upon a single pressure on the trigger", and therefore is an illegal weapon which he sold. The Flying Vet bought it with a plane. He wanted the plane, so he sold the prop. The prop DOES NOT HAVE A TRIGGER. The barrel IS BLOCKED. British law does not let truth stand in the way of a good accusation. It is obviously planned that the jury will be rigged. Such was the case with the trial of Ronald Castree in 2007. There are supposed to be TWELVE members of the jury. Instead, there were secretly FIFTEEN. At Bradford Crown Court, they were hidden behind a smoked-glass screen so that they could not be identified or counted. If three jurors object to the rigged verdict, there will still be twelve puppets to agree. So justice APPEARS to have been served. At the Kirk trial, Nadia Feldmeier took notes - just as the police did. It is not illegal to take notes. She then published the names of the jury. It is not illegal to publish the names of the jury. However, the British "Establishment" has a guilty conscience. Firstly, the "lawyers" have never been to law school. The "ethic" of the gang is that it is FORBIDDEN for them to know law. Thus, they are obliged to go to their lodges, and ask their masters for instructions. To be a "lawyer", a "doctor", a "politican" or any other leader of society, you must only be a member of the gang and blindly obedient to your master. Secondly, the "lawyers" INVENT any law that suits them. Sometimes, they fake up some reference in a law-book. If they do that, they blurt out the reference so quickly that nobody has time to write it down and check it out. So nobody gets to prove that the reference is bogus. But what's the point? TO WHOM would you prove that courts are rigged? TO THE CORRUPT "ESTABLISHMENT" ITSELF? So for the most part, having a monopoly of power, the "lawyers" simply accuse without any attempt at proving the validity of the accusation. Nadia Feldmeier was arrested under the pretext of "Contempt of Court". http://www.zimbio.com/Nadia/articles...y+Taking+Notes She had done nothing illegal. She had not been told in advance that anything she was doing was considered to be illegal. She simply published FACTS, and was arrested. She, like the Flying Vet, is in prison NOW. KIDNAPPED by the Gang. http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm Charles Douglas Wehner |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|