If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Newps wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: ATC provides separation when working IFR aircraft. The local controllers' duties are different. No they are not. There aren't any VFR towers these days? There aren't any aircraft not on VFR flight plans these days? They provide sequencing and safe use of runways and takiways. "Separation" in the context of IFR separation is not part of the local job when the Class D area is VFR. It most certainly is and the weather is irrelevant. Visual separation of IFR aircraft is no longer used? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Sam Spade wrote: Newps wrote: Sam Spade wrote: ATC provides separation when working IFR aircraft. The local controllers' duties are different. No they are not. There aren't any VFR towers these days? You said the local controllers duties are different, saying they do not provide separation. The local controller ensures initial IFR separation between IFR arrivals and departures. "Separation" in the context of IFR separation is not part of the local job when the Class D area is VFR. It most certainly is and the weather is irrelevant. Visual separation of IFR aircraft is no longer used? You said separation is not part of the local job. IFR separation is always part of the job. The weather is irrelevant. If visual separation is used you have to have approved separation both before and after the application of visual. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Newps wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: Newps wrote: Sam Spade wrote: ATC provides separation when working IFR aircraft. The local controllers' duties are different. No they are not. There aren't any VFR towers these days? You said the local controllers duties are different, saying they do not provide separation. The local controller ensures initial IFR separation between IFR arrivals and departures. "Separation" in the context of IFR separation is not part of the local job when the Class D area is VFR. It most certainly is and the weather is irrelevant. Visual separation of IFR aircraft is no longer used? You said separation is not part of the local job. IFR separation is always part of the job. The weather is irrelevant. If visual separation is used you have to have approved separation both before and after the application of visual. When I am cleared for a visual I am told to maintain my own separation. I guess you are referring to the tower applying visual separation without telling me? I still fail to understand where a VFR tower does other than release aircraft and accept them as the IFR controlling facility tells them. I understand that local controller at an IFR tower does some limited separation duties, again in accordance with the IFR controlling agency, whether it be a TRACON downstairs or a center. Those duties are quite limited compared to runway and ground movement activities. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Sam Spade wrote: When I am cleared for a visual I am told to maintain my own separation. If you see the airplane in front of you, yes, you are told to follow it. Or if the aircraft is landing on a different runway you would be told to maintain visual. I guess you are referring to the tower applying visual separation without telling me? They can, between you and a departure. I still fail to understand where a VFR tower does other than release aircraft and accept them as the IFR controlling facility tells them. They are responsible for the initial separation, either as specified by the radar facility or in a letter of agreement. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Newps wrote:
I still fail to understand where a VFR tower does other than release aircraft and accept them as the IFR controlling facility tells them. They are responsible for the initial separation, either as specified by the radar facility or in a letter of agreement. I don't want to whip this puppy to death, but if ACME TRACON tells PDQ VFR tower to "release N1234C at 24 minutes past the hour, void after 27 past the hour" what possible separation duties is the tower performing other than to comply with the release time, which assures the separation the TRACON is providing will, in fact, happen. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Sam Spade wrote: I don't want to whip this puppy to death, but if ACME TRACON tells PDQ VFR tower to "release N1234C at 24 minutes past the hour, void after 27 past the hour" They don't give a release like that to a tower. That's FSS stuff only. The tower will be given the release with any restrictions such as altitude and/or heading. what possible separation duties is the tower performing other than to comply with the release time, which assures the separation the TRACON is providing will, in fact, happen. The release will be given and the tower has to separate the departure(s) from any arrivals already talking to the tower. The tower has to ensure initial separation from successive departures, especially diverging runways where the departures then have to turn back toward each other to get to their radar assigned headings. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he cleared Comair 5191 for takeoff
Newps wrote in
: They don't give a release like that to a tower. That's FSS stuff only. FSS gives releases????? I was always told FSS passes on FSS clearances and you get a ATC clearance through FSS. Allen |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
A Lieberma wrote: Newps wrote in : They don't give a release like that to a tower. That's FSS stuff only. FSS gives releases????? It's the type of release given to a FSS. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he cleared Comair 5191 for takeoff
Sam Spade writes:
I don't want to whip this puppy to death ... All I see is dry puppy-shaped bones. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
The Lexington ATC was NOT doing traffic count after he clearedComair 5191 for takeoff
Newps wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: I don't want to whip this puppy to death, but if ACME TRACON tells PDQ VFR tower to "release N1234C at 24 minutes past the hour, void after 27 past the hour" They don't give a release like that to a tower. That's FSS stuff only. The tower will be given the release with any restrictions such as altitude and/or heading. what possible separation duties is the tower performing other than to comply with the release time, which assures the separation the TRACON is providing will, in fact, happen. The release will be given and the tower has to separate the departure(s) from any arrivals already talking to the tower. The tower has to ensure initial separation from successive departures, especially diverging runways where the departures then have to turn back toward each other to get to their radar assigned headings. That sounds like an IFR tower. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Piloting | 131 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |