If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
I have noticed over the years that this glider sells for what seems to
be a very low price given that it is a near 50:1 glider. But I notice lately that there are also some for sale on Wings & Wheels with relatively low total time: 320 hours $21k 260 hours $20k 200 hours $15k Other than the obvious issues of dealing with a more cumbersome glider to assemble, ground-handle, and store, is there some other inherent problem with these gliders? I would expect to see a lot more hours on gliders of this vintage, and a higher price for gliders of this performance. TIA -Doug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
I have a little time in a friend's Lak-12 flying XC out of Turf, AZ.
Nice glider, if a little crude compared to similar German offerings. But everything works. Cockpit is big and comfortable, except for a "roger hook" type thingy at the rear of the canopy that would probably have put a dent in my noggin on a hard landing - but then I sat way back with the backrest removed. No real comfort issues during several 3- 4 hour flights. Flies nice, but it is a 20 meter ship, so adverse yaw is an issue. Real good weak weather ship. Never got to fly it ballasted, but chasing my friends in their 15 meter/std ships, I would gain on climbs and lose on fast long glides in typical strong AZ conditions - exactly what you would expect for an unballasted 20 m ship. On weak days, it would easily outclimb smaller ships, and late afternoon/evening final glides were wonderful - felt like you could go forever!. Landing took some care due to adverse yaw and long wings. Also, wheel is too far aft (IMHO), so it is easy to put on nose using the effective wheel brake (very un-german in that respect!). Now the bad part. ONE PIECE WINGS. Real heavy to rig/derig, huge trailer. So solve the rigging issue (one man rig, lots of friends, hangar) and it's really got a lot of bank for the buck! I think it would be a great ship for the midwest (lots of runways/big fields to land in) but I worried about landing out in small narrow desert strips with it. If offered, I would fly one again in a heartbeat! Kirk LS6-b "66" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
I googled this topic and could not find previous threads
on RAS, but I suspect they exist. I would expect most experiences are similiar to mine...helped put the huge wings on, but no time flying the bird. It would be my experience that if one of these landed out in a field where self-riggers would not operate...it would be 3-4 strong friends to get it into a trailer. Assembly/disassem bly reminded me of a Grob 103, although on hardtop with self rigging gear and a good trailer I suspect things would be much easier. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
"Stewart Kissel" wrote in
message ... I googled this topic and could not find previous threads on RAS, but I suspect they exist. I would expect most experiences are similiar to mine...helped put the huge wings on, but no time flying the bird. It would be my experience that if one of these landed out in a field where self-riggers would not operate...it would be 3-4 strong friends to get it into a trailer. Assembly/disassem bly reminded me of a Grob 103, although on hardtop with self rigging gear and a good trailer I suspect things would be much easier. Frank Whiteley, who owns a LAK-12, and I have discussed this. If the one-man rigging system used "gate hinge" type root dolleys on the trailer, then the wings could be swung out ~45 degrees to the trailer/fuselage before the Udo-type wing dolly was attached to the wing CG. Then, the wheels of the wing dolly needn't roll more than 4-6 feet when rigging/derigging. One could pack a sheet of plywood to lay on soft ground for the wing dolly wheels to roll on. That way, even if you landed in a soft plowed field, rigging aids would still work. Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
Kirk is right on with his description. It appears very similar in
most respects to the Jantar-1 (19m), which I did own and fly. When I drove my trailer on to the field, all rigging volunteers instantly disappeared! When I got a hangar, it proved an enjoyable ship to own and fly. I suspect the same is true of the LAK-12. I wouldn't consider it if you're going to rig every day before flying. Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
Bill Daniels wrote:
If the one-man rigging system used "gate hinge" type root dolleys on the trailer, then the wings could be swung out ~45 degrees to the trailer/fuselage before the Udo-type wing dolly was attached to the wing CG. Then, the wheels of the wing dolly needn't roll more than 4-6 feet when rigging/derigging. One could pack a sheet of plywood to lay on soft ground for the wing dolly wheels to roll on. That way, even if you landed in a soft plowed field, rigging aids would still work. If it's a soft plowed field, would you be able to get a heavy 40 foot long trailer to the glider? And get it out when it's even heavier with the glider in it? It wouldn't work around here in eastern Washington state as the vehicles would get stuck, and many farmers would not like the car and trailer on their plowed field. I've never helped carry a Lak 12 out of a field, though it might be fun to be the guy taking the pictures of the retrieve! Maybe Doug should call all the people selling the Lak 12 and ask them why they are selling it. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message newsk6%h.426$dj2.277@trndny02... Bill Daniels wrote: If the one-man rigging system used "gate hinge" type root dolleys on the trailer, then the wings could be swung out ~45 degrees to the trailer/fuselage before the Udo-type wing dolly was attached to the wing CG. Then, the wheels of the wing dolly needn't roll more than 4-6 feet when rigging/derigging. One could pack a sheet of plywood to lay on soft ground for the wing dolly wheels to roll on. That way, even if you landed in a soft plowed field, rigging aids would still work. If it's a soft plowed field, would you be able to get a heavy 40 foot long trailer to the glider? And get it out when it's even heavier with the glider in it? It wouldn't work around here in eastern Washington state as the vehicles would get stuck, and many farmers would not like the car and trailer on their plowed field. Is there any real difference between a 30 foot trailer and a 40 foot in this situation? It's also worth pointing out that with the LAK's performance, it shouldn't arise often. Obviously, driving into a soft field is a bad idea that should be avoided if possible but it's been done successfully. The LAK is heavier than, say, a 3-piece wing BG-12 or a Skylark 4, but I've helped get those out of plowed fields. I recall some pilots carrying a 1000' spool of rope and a pulley block to gently pull gliders to a gate where they could be derigged without putting the trailer on the field. The LAK WILL be more of a problem in retrieves but if you think about it you can deal with it. The LAK is not as bad as my old Lark IS28b2 and I could rig it solo.. Bill Daniels |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
Thanks for all of the feedback, guys. The weak lift performance is
certainly a plus here in Michigan. The downside issues are food for thought. Paying for a hangar so it could be left rigged is out of the question for me. Although I currently use an Udo dolly on my 15-meter ship and that dolly is marvelous. It may make the LAK-12 assembly/ disassembly task acceptable. Regards, -Doug |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
Bill Daniels wrote:
If it's a soft plowed field, would you be able to get a heavy 40 foot long trailer to the glider? And get it out when it's even heavier with the glider in it? It wouldn't work around here in eastern Washington state as the vehicles would get stuck, and many farmers would not like the car and trailer on their plowed field. Is there any real difference between a 30 foot trailer and a 40 foot in this situation? I would expect a much larger and heavier trailer to be a much bigger problem. The tow car has got to pull a lot harder, with a greater risk digging into the soft dirt, You can't manhandle it as easily if it gets stuck. It's also worth pointing out that with the LAK's performance, it shouldn't arise often. That depends on the pilot ^ - nobody needs to land in a field if it's important not to, and at 20 meters, many airports and private strips are unusable. The fear of a difficult retrieve or damage when landing on a small airport makes the pilot fly more conservatively, which reduces his soaring pleasure, and I suspect that factor is about half of the reason these gliders are so cheap. The other half is the irritation of dealing with them on the ground, or paying for a hangar. The LAK WILL be more of a problem in retrieves but if you think about it you can deal with it. Agreed! A prospective owner should consider the hassles and if there are acceptable solutions to them, and not be let the "bang for the buck" figure crowd out consideration of these issues. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
LAK-12 Question
On May 5, 4:54 am, Doug Hoffman wrote:
I have noticed over the years that this glider sells for what seems to be a very low price given that it is a near 50:1 glider. But I notice lately that there are also some for sale on Wings & Wheels with relatively low total time: 320 hours $21k 260 hours $20k 200 hours $15k Other than the obvious issues of dealing with a more cumbersome glider to assemble, ground-handle, and store, is there some other inherent problem with these gliders? I would expect to see a lot more hours on gliders of this vintage, and a higher price for gliders of this performance. TIA -Doug Tried to reply twice earlier but neither have showed up yet. Seems to happen on the weekends. For those interested in buying, join the Yahoo group LAK12 and review some of the items there. The LAK-12 flies fine. I haven't flown mine with water yet, but a couple of owners report that ballast makes it a different, and even better, glider. There are a couple of size considerations if you have a long torso or big feet. Both can be accommodated to some extent. It is pretty heavy, flapped, and I suspect some low-time in glider owners haven't been comfortable in it and didn't get much practice. The rigging effort required due to the poor trailer setup probably limited the amount of hours they were able to get and resulted in some intimidation regarding XC flying for others. The LAK12 is a niche glider, comparable to the Nimbus 2, ASW-17, and Kestrel 19, so attractive only to a smaller part of the market. Rigging and the trailer are real issues, owing in part to the 230lb wing panels and the poor trailer setup. Anyone considering buying one should budget for some trailer modifications. Doing so will relieve much of the problem. Domestic trailer replacement would cost about $8000 plus rigging. I understand some of the trailers have structural problems, and from what I've heard I suspect from excessive snow loads. The rigging issues are largely part of the trailer design and the wing root dollies. I've modified my door and rails with scissors jacks and have replaced the aft trailer supports with longer sections to reduce the fore and aft slope of the trailer dramatically and to keep the fuselage dolly on the tracks to avoid the tail lift to get the wheel down. Apart from that, the trailer tows well behind my F150 and the surge brakes work fine. The suspension is trailing torsion arm with shock. The sprung section is steel, not rubber. It smooths out the bumps. I think one owner had a suspension member fail. I use an Udo dolly, which is not quite right for this glider. The next stage will involve modifying the axle and inner wheel wells then adding another stabilizing track and modified root dollies and a new wing dolly. After that, I expect the glider with become one person rig with no heavy lifting. I can rig now with one other person, mostly for stabilizing the wings while moving them in and out of the trailer. The scissors jacks help with the spigot and spar pin alignments which are critical for assembly and finally with raising and lower the gear. Taking a couple of extra minutes with alignment before pulling the wings together makes it pretty easy. The real hard part is lifting the wings in and out of the trailer saddles atop the wheel wells and at the tip. It's the trailer design that's kept people from flying them much XC or frequently enough to be really comfortable with it. I suspect several of the owners may have been low time glider drivers and possibly first time private owners. This is my seventh glider and I had rigged one a few times before and knew what the pitfalls were. I've already solved some of the rigging issues and hope to finish the rest before long. I've rigged and derigged a lot of glider types over the years. The handbook for the LAK-12 says it can be rigged by 3-4 in 10 minutes. True, if it's the same crew each time, but where will you find that these days? But that also means a lot of lifting. So far I haven't heard about too many where the owners have taken time to fix the short comings of the trailer and rigging issues. It's doable. Have a peek in the lak12 yahoo group. Plus side Good forward and all around visibility. Excellent performance. Thermals dry down around 41-42kts. Tall undercarriage. Same oleo strut as Blaniks. Positive lock in up and down position. Medium effort to raise and lower. Good wheel brake with stick handle. Two 12AH battery boxes for all those gadgets. Good access to all controls and fittings. Ballast system appears both well designed and functions fine from what I'm told. Ventilation. So-so side In board sections are flaps only. Out board sections are flaperons. Tail emits a tone when thermaling on several, like blowing over the top of a beer bottle. Canopy is not strut supported, but held in open position by over- center lock. Original canopies are screwed, not glued, to frame. Down side Trailer design Wing root dollies Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no | gasman | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 05 06:39 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |