A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential Helicopter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 16th 05, 01:00 PM
Helowriter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Presidential Helicopter

Despite all the politics and planted press coverage around the VXX
decision, has no one has noticed that the Navy chose a less-safe,
lower-performance helicopter for the Marines to carry the President of
the United States? Coalition payback aside (and oops, the Italians
just announced they're pulling out of Iraq), this is not a good thing.

Just by virtue of when the S-92 and EH101 were designed, the VH-92 was
a generation ahead of the US101 in safety and crashworthiness. A lot of
the flaw-tolerant design methods used in the VH-92 just didn't exist
when the EH101/US101 was designed. Now we're going to pay the Italians
to bring the EH101 structures up to modern standards for
crashworthiness, birdstrike protection, etc. And to get a wider cabin,
the President will spend the next 30 years riding above fuel tanks.

And oh yeah, Lockheed Martin also has to build a whole new secure
manufacturing and support setup to include foreign workers in factories
offshore.

Hopefully, if the US101 runs late and over budget, we all get another
chance at a new Marine One.

  #2  
Old March 16th 05, 07:27 PM
Starshiy Nemo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


NoPe
NH-90 is largely ahead of the two contenders!!!!
  #3  
Old March 16th 05, 07:40 PM
Helowriter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Says who? NH-90 doesn't have the cabin volume.

  #4  
Old March 16th 05, 08:17 PM
Starshiy Nemo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Is M. Bush so Fat?
  #5  
Old March 16th 05, 11:04 PM
Per Nordenberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Helowriter" skrev i meddelandet
oups.com...
Says who? NH-90 doesn't have the cabin volume.



If the problem is lack of height in the cabin the NH-90 can be ordered with an extra 30 cm height,
just like those on order for the Swedish armed forces.

http://www.hkpflj.mil.se/ronneby/pho...9713&nid=23433


Regards,

Per Nordenberg

  #6  
Old March 18th 05, 03:36 PM
Helowriter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If we're talking Presidential transport, it's headroom and length, and
(I'm not sure about width on the NH-90 cabin. Northrop Grumman is
pitching the NH-90 for the US Air Force Personnel Recovery Vehicle, and
that seems to need a cabin somewhere between the MH-60G and PRV.

As to Mr. Bush's dimensions, he was not the one feeding off the
oil-for-food program with Saddam Hussein. Apparently, that was Jacques
Chirac's feeding spot.

HW

  #7  
Old March 18th 05, 05:20 PM
Starshiy Nemo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


No need for Chirac...But Bush largely needed Ben Laden money to pay for
his bankrupted oil cy....
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Presidential Helicopter Helowriter Rotorcraft 34 April 9th 05 01:52 AM
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 February 8th 05 02:20 PM
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract [email protected] Rotorcraft 0 January 30th 05 03:48 AM
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Rotorcraft 0 February 25th 04 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.