Fair Tribunals at Guantanamo? (Was: YANK CHILD ABUSERS :: another reason to kill americans abroad ???)

Jim, you've made too little sense for far too long. While you show
glimmers of intelligence, you steadfastly refuse to use it.

Goodbye.

plonk

Jim Watt wrote:

:On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:44:42 -0700, "TinCanman"
wrote:
:
:
:"Jim Watt" wrote in message
. ..
: On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 05:35:55 -0700, "TinCanman"
: wrote:
:
:
: "Jim Watt" wrote in message
: .. .
: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:52:14 -0700, "TinCanman"
: wrote:
:
: Your observation there is no war IS irrelevant
:
: Its a legal point, and the reason for introducing the Japanese
: premptive strike was that after the war your country used that
: to prosecute the Japanese.
:
: The reasons why America refuses to accept an international
: criminal court to deal with these problems is clear. You are
: the criminals.
:
:
: --
: Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com
:
: Well, that does it for me. If there was ever the slightest doubt why the
: U.S. has not signed on to the Uropeen IKK, there exists none now. Not
:even a
: glimmer.
:
: International not Euopean.
: --
: Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com
:
:Not from my perspective. It's merely a continuation of the Uropeen Diplomacy
:model designed to hamstring the powerful and level the playing field for the
:has beens. That model is in failure mode and is no longer appropriate as is
:the U.N. The U.N. as an international forum for mediation has failed. It
:sucks up a tremendous amount of resources and provides a platform for the
:worlds despots with little to show for the effort; IOW, just more jawboning
:lawyers and politicians. I doubt the new world order will be as you have
:envisioned it.
:
:How easy it is to dismiss the UN when it does not rubber stamp
:everything that suits you. The UN and its agencies organise
:international telecommunications, air travel, safety of life at sea
:and do a lot of good in the world.
:
:Its a big world, and some parts of it are more civilised than
:the extended version of the Jerry Springer show that your
erspective is based on.
:
:Mind you he might make a better president than the one
:you have at present.
:
:http://www.runjerryrun.com/