If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
On Apr 10, 9:34 am, (Michel Talon) wrote:
Mike Schumann wrote: GA isn't growing either. The number of student pilot licenses issued has dropped over 20% in the last few years. One of the leading flight schools in the Twin Cities (Wings) has just closed as a result. Mike Schumann Of course. People practising such activities tend to be wealthier than the average, and so sincerely believe that cost is not a problem. They are completely overlooking the fact that they belong to an extremely small minority, and that for the vast majority of people, aviation activities are completely cost forbidden. There are lots of expensive horses in fields round where I live. Compared to gliding, riding can be pretty expensive for anyone with any ambition to compete. Not only are good horses expensive (in the UK), they eat, need shoing, and so on. There are also plenty of off- shore boats racing - another expensive hobby. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
Michel Talon wrote:
Mike Schumann wrote: GA isn't growing either. The number of student pilot licenses issued has dropped over 20% in the last few years. One of the leading flight schools in the Twin Cities (Wings) has just closed as a result. Mike Schumann Of course. People practising such activities tend to be wealthier than the average, and so sincerely believe that cost is not a problem. They are completely overlooking the fact that they belong to an extremely small minority, and that for the vast majority of people, aviation activities are completely cost forbidden. A large number of students/pilots (for the full range of ratings) have also come from foreign countries for training in the USA, historically. That was reduced greatly after 9/11. This has to have some effect on the referenced statistics. Some training establishments have gone out of business as a direct result of the loss of foreign students. "The vast majority of people" are not those with whom we are concerned, nor is it very expensive to get training in a glider up through the PP-G rating. Familiarity with the opportunity and the motivation to put aside the other temptations offered by our very comfortable society are the main factors, IMO. Those who are by no means "wealthier than average" are today often found to be enjoying flat screen TV's which cost as much as the training for a private pilot certificate in a glider. Get people into a glider and familiarize them with what they can do as a glider pilot, and you'll recruit them. Watch those commercial and club operations which continue to thrive and emulate them. This is not a systemic problem so much as a problem at the local club grassroots level. People who would otherwise be flying Cessnas, but think it's too expensive today, should be flying sailplanes. Show them the pure, eco-friendly freedom of sailplane flight and you'll hook them in great numbers. Our club needs a couple more modern two-seaters. I'd bet your does, too. And when you get these new people, keep them by emphasizing cross-country flying. Don't let them slip away out of boredom from being tethered to the windsock. Jack |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
2 seat gliders are definitely a key issue. Without attractive and available
2 seat gliders, you can't give rides to new blood. There's nothing more frustrating than inviting some friends to go flying with you on a weekend, and then having them stand around for 4-5 hours because there are way too many people trying to share a limited pool of dual gliders. Mike Schumann "Jack" wrote in message ... Michel Talon wrote: Mike Schumann wrote: GA isn't growing either. The number of student pilot licenses issued has dropped over 20% in the last few years. One of the leading flight schools in the Twin Cities (Wings) has just closed as a result. Mike Schumann Of course. People practising such activities tend to be wealthier than the average, and so sincerely believe that cost is not a problem. They are completely overlooking the fact that they belong to an extremely small minority, and that for the vast majority of people, aviation activities are completely cost forbidden. A large number of students/pilots (for the full range of ratings) have also come from foreign countries for training in the USA, historically. That was reduced greatly after 9/11. This has to have some effect on the referenced statistics. Some training establishments have gone out of business as a direct result of the loss of foreign students. "The vast majority of people" are not those with whom we are concerned, nor is it very expensive to get training in a glider up through the PP-G rating. Familiarity with the opportunity and the motivation to put aside the other temptations offered by our very comfortable society are the main factors, IMO. Those who are by no means "wealthier than average" are today often found to be enjoying flat screen TV's which cost as much as the training for a private pilot certificate in a glider. Get people into a glider and familiarize them with what they can do as a glider pilot, and you'll recruit them. Watch those commercial and club operations which continue to thrive and emulate them. This is not a systemic problem so much as a problem at the local club grassroots level. People who would otherwise be flying Cessnas, but think it's too expensive today, should be flying sailplanes. Show them the pure, eco-friendly freedom of sailplane flight and you'll hook them in great numbers. Our club needs a couple more modern two-seaters. I'd bet your does, too. And when you get these new people, keep them by emphasizing cross-country flying. Don't let them slip away out of boredom from being tethered to the windsock. Jack -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Growth in soaring
Using on-line Schedulemaster enables our club to maximize use of the
two-place ships. Thanks to this program, club members don't have to wait for hours to get a ship. Let people know how inexpensive soaring is. It's not a matter of how much one can spend on high-end sailplanes ; it's how inexpensive it is become a soaring pilot that matters. One doesn't have to earn a lot of money to make that dream come true. Join the Promote soaring Team and help get the word out. Go to the SSA Publicity Committee Home page for contact information. On Apr 10, 7:36 pm, "Mike Schumann" mike-nos...@traditions- nospam.com wrote: 2 seat gliders are definitely a key issue. Without attractive and available 2 seat gliders, you can't give rides to new blood. There's nothing more frustrating than inviting some friends to go flying with you on a weekend, and then having them stand around for 4-5 hours because there are way too many people trying to share a limited pool of dual gliders. Mike Schumann "Jack" wrote in message ... Michel Talon wrote: Mike Schumann wrote: GA isn't growing either. The number of student pilot licenses issued has dropped over 20% in the last few years. One of the leading flight schools in the Twin Cities (Wings) has just closed as a result. Mike Schumann Of course. People practising such activities tend to be wealthier than the average, and so sincerely believe that cost is not a problem. They are completely overlooking the fact that they belong to an extremely small minority, and that for the vast majority of people, aviation activities are completely cost forbidden. A large number of students/pilots (for the full range of ratings) have also come from foreign countries for training in the USA, historically. That was reduced greatly after 9/11. This has to have some effect on the referenced statistics. Some training establishments have gone out of business as a direct result of the loss of foreign students. "The vast majority of people" are not those with whom we are concerned, nor is it very expensive to get training in a glider up through the PP-G rating. Familiarity with the opportunity and the motivation to put aside the other temptations offered by our very comfortable society are the main factors, IMO. Those who are by no means "wealthier than average" are today often found to be enjoying flat screen TV's which cost as much as the training for a private pilot certificate in a glider. Get people into a glider and familiarize them with what they can do as a glider pilot, and you'll recruit them. Watch those commercial and club operations which continue to thrive and emulate them. This is not a systemic problem so much as a problem at the local club grassroots level. People who would otherwise be flying Cessnas, but think it's too expensive today, should be flying sailplanes. Show them the pure, eco-friendly freedom of sailplane flight and you'll hook them in great numbers. Our club needs a couple more modern two-seaters. I'd bet your does, too. And when you get these new people, keep them by emphasizing cross-country flying. Don't let them slip away out of boredom from being tethered to the windsock. Jack -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
Mogas and microbial growth | Economic Girly Man | Owning | 6 | November 13th 04 09:14 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Aircraft growth (question starting with Art Kramer) | Howard Berkowitz | Military Aviation | 9 | June 6th 04 03:26 PM |
Self launch effect on soaring growth | John Jones | Soaring | 12 | April 27th 04 03:53 AM |