Hypothesis on USAir birdstrike

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
wrote in news:ca87032c-7532-474f-9d2f-
f178f34ba2b7
@m16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:

On Jan 25, 9:59 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
(Steve Pope) wrote in news:glj9o8$5mp$3
@blue.rahul.net:

vaughn wrote:

The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not
in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the
other engine" likely. It is possible I suppose, but not likely.
Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly
wrong,
but it is dangerous to bet against it.

Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that
each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely
either.

Yea,h it is actualy.



I'm not sure if you expect bird remains in an engine that lay at
the bottom of the Hudson for a week, but there should be
blade damage consistent with sucking a bird if the double-bird
theory is correct.

not neccesarily.

Bertie

Its the 'magic bird' theory!

See, the bird first scared the aircrew, then was sucked through
Eng1,
expelled at .95 mach where it then was carried up and over the plane
to the other engine where it hit John Connolly in the wrist.

Nah, to simple.

I think I heard from a friend who saw it on the internet at his
cousin's house that Dick Cheney was wheeling through Central Park
with
a black box that had a big red button labelled "Set off airborne
thermite grenades on flight 1549".

JUST LIKE 9-11 !!!


Oh no! Don' tgive them ideas! Those fukkers give me a headache.

Bertie

Lay off the drug and alcohol.



Oh thanks for the good advice Maxie!



I'll take it under close advisement considerign the source.

Bertie

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote in
:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

(Steve Pope) wrote vaughn
wrote:

The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not
in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the
other engine" likely. It is possible I suppose, but not likely.
Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly
wrong,
but it is dangerous to bet against it.

Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that
each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely
either.

Yeah it is actualy.

Statistically it is simply the square of a single bird strike.
Probably
plus some other factors to make it more likely because birds often
fly
in flocks.

Graham

Now Bertei is removing groups ! sigh


Netkkkoping fjukktard.


Bertie



Wanna be retard.


Guide me oh master.

Bertie

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote in
:



vaughn wrote:

Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly wrong

You're confusing it with 'consensus' e.g. AGW.


Planespotting fjukkkkkkwit.



Bertie

Diaper spotting retard.


Yep, i look for ****..



ooow ooow! There;s one now!


Bertie

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote in
:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote in
Steve Pope wrote:

The reports are there was a birdstrike and explosion
and both engines went silent. What are the odds that,
instead of a double birstrike, there was a single
birdstrike taking out one engine, but due to some
design flaw or maintenance issue the other engine lost
power also?

NIL

nope, wrong again planespotter

Expecting you to give an example would be pretty futile I expect.

Why do engines have independent fuel systems for example ?

Blow me you nigel fjukkwit.


Bertie

Take some Viagra so he can at least find it, wanna be fat ass.


Oh good one maxie.

Ouch!


Bertie

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote in
:



harry k wrote:

I hope the final accident report is published here

Have you seen how large they typically are ? It'll be on the NTSB
site when it comes out.


Won't stiop you from givng your worthless opinion in th emeantime
theough eh planespotter?



Bertie

Says the poster child for worthless opinions.


Yeh, ouch!


Bwawhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwhahwh!




Bertie

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote in
:



"Gary L. Burnore" wrote:

"Gregory Hall" wrote:

Maybe the bird stuck its tongue into the engine?

Or, quite possibly, the pilot was laughing so hard at you for
losing
your DataBasix account for net abuse.......

My God ! Is it even possible to lose one of their accounts. I
thought
they were 'pro-abuse'.


Sez netkkkkoping nigel. Just because nobody ever pays any attention
to
your
netkopping attempts doesn;t mean that there aren't some actual legit
grounds for TOSsing someone, fjukkkwit


Bertie

No, I think you are a pretty good example that many ISPs could care
less
about the Usenet.



it's "couldn't" care less, fjukktard.

If they could care less than they must care at least a bit.

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote
harry k wrote:

I hope the final accident report is published here

Have you seen how large they typically are ? It'll be on the NTSB site
when it comes out.

Won't stiop you from givng your worthless opinion in th emeantime theough
eh planespotter?

I don't think the FACTS are in any doubt on this one.

Graham

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Actually, you're k00k fodder pooh pooh.

Did you know The Meow no longer has a Wikipedia entry ? Who was whose
fodder there, eh ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow

Meow, miaow, miau, mew and others, are different spellings for one of
the sounds made by cats. While cats occasionally vocalize to one another
with purrs, growls, and screams, they generally communicate with one
another through body language, and most communications we would
recognize as "meow" are specifically for human interaction[citation
needed].

Graham

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Just because nobody ever pays any attention to your
netkopping attempts

Awwwww baby !


doesn;t mean that there aren't some actual legit
grounds for TOSsing someone

Yes, I had someone TOSsed last week.

Graham

Eeyore wrote in
:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Eeyore wrote
harry k wrote:

I hope the final accident report is published here

Have you seen how large they typically are ? It'll be on the NTSB
site when it comes out.

Won't stiop you from givng your worthless opinion in th emeantime
theough eh planespotter?

I don't think the FACTS are in any doubt on this one.

You're not talking fact, fjukktard, you're spouting media conjecture, you
planespotting turd



Bertie