A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"PENTAGON WORKING TO GIVE F-35 JSF NUCLEAR-STRIKE CAPABILITY"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old May 1st 09, 07:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Ian B MacLure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default "PENTAGON WORKING TO GIVE F-35 JSF NUCLEAR-STRIKE CAPABILITY"

Ed Rasimus wrote in
:

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:26:10 +0200, "dott.Piergiorgio"
wrote:

Ian B MacLure ha scritto:
"dott.Piergiorgio"
wrote in :

Mike ha scritto:
Inside the Air Force - 4/24/2009

GENERAL: PENTAGON WORKING TO GIVE F-35 JSF NUCLEAR-STRIKE
CAPABILITY

The Defense Department and a handful of allies have launched an
effort to ensure the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program is capable
of conducting the most devastating mission in modern warfare --
delivering a nuclear bomb.
Ugh.....

let's cross well the fingers, there's already a mess, and a -D
version, available to select few, has all the potential to sink the
entire program......

Why another version? It would simply be a Block X update to
whatever was fielded. What after all is the difference
between nuclear and non-nuclear capable aircraft? Basically
some form of safety gear related to weapon fusing.


Indeed, but the "select few" in the end actually is a "select one"
(the other reliable US ally is well-known for their penchant for
indigenous solutions), and other partecipating countries have a public
opinion more or less against nuke weapons, and at least a pair of said
countries has serious issues with their Defence budget.... it's easy
to draw the (inauspicious) conclusions, IMVHO.

Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.


And, yet, in the past the list of NATO allies that sat alert with
tactical nuclear weapons on small jets was pretty long:

Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium, Turkey, Greece, Italy, W. Germany,
France, UK...


Kanuckistan. Their 104s had a nuclear strike role before
"Turdeau" took over.

IBM
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Pentagon Wants Kill Switch for Planes" Jim Logajan Piloting 24 June 16th 08 03:27 PM
Spinner strobing as a "Bird Strike Countermeasure" Jim Logajan Piloting 259 December 13th 07 05:43 AM
Spinner strobing as a "Bird Strike Countermeasure" Jim Logajan Home Built 212 December 13th 07 01:35 AM
"British trace missile in copter strike to Iran" Mike[_7_] Naval Aviation 8 March 10th 07 08:20 PM
"Pentagon Command Shuffle Rekindles Equity Debate" Mike Naval Aviation 1 January 26th 07 03:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.