If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Proxalert R5 proximity alerter
Hi,
Aviation Consumer finally evaluated the Proxalert R5 proximity alerter and what they say is crystal clear : "It has better performance and features" than other devices and "The R5 is the easy winner over Surecheck" trafficscope. Those interested could buy a copy of the article at www.aviation-consumer.com" Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
better yet see what *real* customers say
-- Pasadena, CA 03-Mar-04 Been flying with my Trafficscope for about 2 months, and it has saved my bacon at least 3 times. The accuracy is amazing. Thanks for producing such a great product. By the way, I had one of the Proxalerts... all I can say is don't bother. Very inaccurate. Not sure who did the ranking, but Trafficscope is much more accurate (and available). Thanks again. http://www.avshop.com/catalog/review...5514&#comment2 Apparently people think the proxalert comes up short. Probably the combination of being a French (not USA) made, and little experience in collision avoidance. (Andrew) wrote in message . com... Hi, Aviation Consumer finally evaluated the Proxalert R5 proximity alerter and what they say is crystal clear : "It has better performance and features" than other devices and "The R5 is the easy winner over Surecheck" trafficscope. Those interested could buy a copy of the article at www.aviation-consumer.com" Andrew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
BHelman,
Probably the combination of being a French (not USA) made Yeah, that must be it! ROFL! That sidebar you guys from Surecheck got in Aviation Consumer is priceless... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Apparently you have a short memory. I don't work for them.
One of the reasons I like the guys at surecheck, is because they don't rely on their friends in publications like ol Berto to sell their products through such obvious slanted editorials. They instead market their product by hard work and advertising. That is why you see their products everywhere, in every tradeshow, and all over the internet. In the end us as pilots and customers always see through the slanting and attack "sidebars". Thomas Borchert wrote in message ... BHelman, Probably the combination of being a French (not USA) made Yeah, that must be it! ROFL! That sidebar you guys from Surecheck got in Aviation Consumer is priceless... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BHelman,
because they don't rely on their friends in publications like ol Berto to sell their products through such obvious slanted editorials. There's a reality-distortion field at work here. Here's what happened: - AvCon did a report which did not give the Surecheck the top spot - Surecheck misquoted that report to say that the Surecheck did have the top spot - AvCon made that fact public and added their opinion about such behaviour What could you possibly slant about these events? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
We went through this before. AvCon clearly said in the last paragraph
that surecheck was the better choice. "the SureCheck TrafficScope is the better choice, in our view. We think SureCheck deserves kudos for dramatically improving its product over the previous iteration and we give the company high marks for much improved customer and technical support." What is there to misinterpret or misquote? If it is misquoted, they would take legal action, but obviously it is not misquoted. You are wanting to agree (to profit from the Monroy sales correct?) with berto who WRITES for AvCon, who will always favor Monroy, and who most likely wrote that "sidebar" / headline, not the editor who actually did the review and said the above quote. There are 2 different editors, with 2 different agendas I think after talking with the company. It seems that this series of "sidebars" is the only "positive" public ackowledgement or endorsement that the Monroy has going, and it is shaky and limited at best. Thomas Borchert wrote in message ... BHelman, because they don't rely on their friends in publications like ol Berto to sell their products through such obvious slanted editorials. There's a reality-distortion field at work here. Here's what happened: - AvCon did a report which did not give the Surecheck the top spot - Surecheck misquoted that report to say that the Surecheck did have the top spot - AvCon made that fact public and added their opinion about such behaviour What could you possibly slant about these events? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Sure Check TPAS traffic proximity alert | Brian | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 21st 04 07:37 PM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Proxalert R5 comments | Frode Berg | Piloting | 0 | May 21st 04 12:06 AM |
Proxalert R5 comments? | Frode Berg | Owning | 0 | May 21st 04 12:05 AM |
Airsport IFR/VFD Altitude Alerter FS | CriticalMass | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 27th 04 10:40 PM |