If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Terrain-Aware Handheld vs. IFR GPS?
OK, here's a new take on an old debate:
I fly a 172 with 2 good NAV/COMs, an M1 Loran and a flaky ADF in the Northeast US. Since everything up here is airways and most of the fields I go to have an ILS or LOC approach, this is enough to get away with on most of the flights I take. This is the plane I got my ticket in so I'm used to it. I've been thinking about trying to talk my partners into floating the 6k or so to install a basic IFR-certified GPS like a GX-50 or similar. No, we cannot afford a GNS-430/480 so that is not part of the decision matrix. Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. I know it's not certified, but the certified GPS will do nothing to warn me that I'm rapidly approaching cumulogranite for whatever reason. Let's say I cannot get both the handheld and the panel-mount: What would you choose? -cwk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I chose the Garmin 296. I found the terrain data very useful.
Jon "C Kingsbury" wrote in message link.net... OK, here's a new take on an old debate: I fly a 172 with 2 good NAV/COMs, an M1 Loran and a flaky ADF in the Northeast US. Since everything up here is airways and most of the fields I go to have an ILS or LOC approach, this is enough to get away with on most of the flights I take. This is the plane I got my ticket in so I'm used to it. I've been thinking about trying to talk my partners into floating the 6k or so to install a basic IFR-certified GPS like a GX-50 or similar. No, we cannot afford a GNS-430/480 so that is not part of the decision matrix. Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. I know it's not certified, but the certified GPS will do nothing to warn me that I'm rapidly approaching cumulogranite for whatever reason. Let's say I cannot get both the handheld and the panel-mount: What would you choose? -cwk. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the
newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. The 296 is small, light, has a big screen, is easy to use, is fast to update the screen, has 256 colors, has sectional shading, has terrain warnings, has a glass panel and has voice turn by turn directions for your car. (once you get to your destination, pull it off the yoke and put it on the dash and now you'll know where the hotel is and all the great restaurants) Also the 296 includes a "Nearest Weather Station" and "Nearest FSS" tab if you press the "Nearest" button. It's handy if you are landing at an ap with no weather reporting. Also it is good for enroute updates on the weather. Further, the 296 has a built in weight and balance calculator that can be customized for any plane. In a matter of three seconds you can have the weight and balance and never pick up a pencil. All the IFR approaches are in the database, but on the negative side they start at the FAF and not at an IAF. They don't give any altitude information and the missed approach proceedure is not on there. All-in-all, dollar-for-dollar that's a lot of bang for the buck and a whole lot of function for 1,695.00. Gene Wentzel, DC '71 177RG "C Kingsbury" wrote in message link.net... OK, here's a new take on an old debate: I fly a 172 with 2 good NAV/COMs, an M1 Loran and a flaky ADF in the Northeast US. Since everything up here is airways and most of the fields I go to have an ILS or LOC approach, this is enough to get away with on most of the flights I take. This is the plane I got my ticket in so I'm used to it. I've been thinking about trying to talk my partners into floating the 6k or so to install a basic IFR-certified GPS like a GX-50 or similar. No, we cannot afford a GNS-430/480 so that is not part of the decision matrix. Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. I know it's not certified, but the certified GPS will do nothing to warn me that I'm rapidly approaching cumulogranite for whatever reason. Let's say I cannot get both the handheld and the panel-mount: What would you choose? -cwk. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It depends, I think, entirely on whether you will be doing GPS approaches or
not. If yes, then IFR panel certified, otherwise the Garmin 296. I have the 296. It is great for situational awareness and has much improved battery life over the 295. That said, I still have an extra battery for the 296 and my Lowrance 100 if that fails. Tien "C Kingsbury" wrote in message link.net... OK, here's a new take on an old debate: I fly a 172 with 2 good NAV/COMs, an M1 Loran and a flaky ADF in the Northeast US. Since everything up here is airways and most of the fields I go to have an ILS or LOC approach, this is enough to get away with on most of the flights I take. This is the plane I got my ticket in so I'm used to it. I've been thinking about trying to talk my partners into floating the 6k or so to install a basic IFR-certified GPS like a GX-50 or similar. No, we cannot afford a GNS-430/480 so that is not part of the decision matrix. Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. I know it's not certified, but the certified GPS will do nothing to warn me that I'm rapidly approaching cumulogranite for whatever reason. Let's say I cannot get both the handheld and the panel-mount: What would you choose? -cwk. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tien Dao wrote: It depends, I think, entirely on whether you will be doing GPS approaches or not. Not only GPS approaches but any approach where knowing a distance helps. Such as a VOR approach that gives a distance to the missed, such as the VOR-A at KBIL. Now you don't have to time or worry about your groundspeed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"C Kingsbury" wrote
Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. I know it's not certified, but the certified GPS will do nothing to warn me that I'm rapidly approaching cumulogranite for whatever reason. Let's say I cannot get both the handheld and the panel-mount: What would you choose? Well, let's look at it another way. Since you don't really need to fly GPS approaches and direct routings are not generally possible in your neck of the woods, the only real benefit of IFR certified GPS is the supposed increased safety of an IFR-approved installation. Against that, you have the increased safety of terrain info. Hmm, let's see, terrain info or blessing by government bureaucrats... Doesn't sound like much of a a choice at all. Michael |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"C Kingsbury" wrote in
link.net: I've been thinking about trying to talk my partners into floating the 6k or so to install a basic IFR-certified GPS like a GX-50 or similar. No, we cannot afford a GNS-430/480 so that is not part of the decision matrix. I have GX-60 (GX-50 with the addition of built-in COMM transceiver). I'm pleased with it, WHEN IT WORKS. This is GX-60 no. 5 in the same airplane. We went through four of them during initial installation before finding one that worked properly (the first three had to be returned to the manufacturer by the installing shop, Montgomery Aviation, Montgomery AL, due to quality control problems). One had severe interference problems, one was DOA, and one had a flaky display. The fourth one worked well for years, until someone broke into the airplane and cleaned out all radios except the Bendix T-12D ADF. The insurance replacement worked for a few months, then the display went intermittent. Back to the factory (they sent a loaner) for repair, get it back, installed, and found that they had fixed the intermittent problem on the display. The display was now totally dead. Back to the factory again (keeping their loaner unit, which their accounting department started sending out bills for, since it had not been returned), and finally got them to admit that the problem really existed. They put in a re-furbed display subassembly. Back in the airplane again, and it has been working fine for about half a year. Warning against GX-50, GX-55, GX-60, GX-65 series: The tech at II Morrow/Apollo/UPSAT/GarminAT (what is their name this week?) told me that as of the end of last year (2003) these are no longer being manufactured due to problems in the supply chain with, guess what, the display subassembly. If I were doing it again today and wanted to keep the budget under control, I would probably go for a KN-89B or KN-90B. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but they're available very inexpensively on the re-furbed market, and repair parts can always be found for King stuff (I'm not a huge King fan, but it is a practical, low-cost solution to IFR approach GPS). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Panel mount stuff is usually better. Turns on with the radios, turns
off with radios, no batteries or cords. Don't need to "get it out". The buttons are built to work with it panel mounted. Probably some other reasons. I have a handheld, and use it some, but its mostly for backup if my panel GPS goes on the fritz. Once you use a good panel mount, you'll never want to go back. "C Kingsbury" wrote in message hlink.net... OK, here's a new take on an old debate: I fly a 172 with 2 good NAV/COMs, an M1 Loran and a flaky ADF in the Northeast US. Since everything up here is airways and most of the fields I go to have an ILS or LOC approach, this is enough to get away with on most of the flights I take. This is the plane I got my ticket in so I'm used to it. I've been thinking about trying to talk my partners into floating the 6k or so to install a basic IFR-certified GPS like a GX-50 or similar. No, we cannot afford a GNS-430/480 so that is not part of the decision matrix. Lately, I've been wondering whether the *real* value of something like the newer handheld GPSs with terrain alerting (i.e. Garmin 296) might actually be greater. I know it's not certified, but the certified GPS will do nothing to warn me that I'm rapidly approaching cumulogranite for whatever reason. Let's say I cannot get both the handheld and the panel-mount: What would you choose? -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:41 AM |
Handheld GPS Works Fine, Except in One Particular Aircraft | jls | Home Built | 3 | July 5th 04 02:35 AM |
STS AV7600 VOR Handheld aviation transceiver | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | May 29th 04 12:16 AM |
STS AV7600 VOR Handheld | John | Home Built | 0 | May 28th 04 05:42 PM |
Are handheld GPSes becoming a defacto primary nav source? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | September 13th 03 10:36 PM |