VFR position reporting

BT writes:

From what you tend to know or have about flight following or position
reporting, that same book will (should) have the format for position
reporting.

I've been looking for the format, but I haven't found it thus far.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Viperdoc wrote:
How did the sim group shut him out? Please share it with the rest of us so
we can do the same.

Actually I'm going to France next summer- perhaps I should look him up and
give him a stack of old charts and books. Besides, I've never seen a real
live troll before.


At least you'll know where to find him... he lives under the bridge.




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com

I've stopped posting answers for him, but do to help the
real student pilots out there.



"BT" wrote in message
...
|I agree Jim... but Mxs is a non pilot..
| it is a matter of semantics..
|
| BT
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| ...
| Not necessarily. Read the AIM.
|
|
|
| "BT" wrote in message
| ...
| | if you are making position reports
| | do you not then have flight following?
| | BT
| |
| | "Mxsmanic" wrote in message
| | ...
| | I'm still not clear on the exact procedure for
position
| reports if you
| | are flying VFR over long distances without flight
| following. To whom
| | do you report your position, and what information
should
| it include?
| | Which positions do you report and how often?
| |
| | --
| | Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
| |
| |
|
|
|
|

"Jim Macklin" wrote in
:

I've stopped posting answers for him, but do to help the
real student pilots out there.

Hopefully others will follow so the noise level will go down. I have been
suggesting this for the past month.

I sure am doing my best not to respond *smile*.

Ignore him and he should go away once everybody does not respond to his
nonsensible replies.

Peer pressure can do wonders in this case by virtual of silence or no
replies.

Allen

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:11:57 GMT, A Lieberma
wrote:

"Jim Macklin" wrote in
:

I've stopped posting answers for him, but do to help the
real student pilots out there.

Hopefully others will follow so the noise level will go down. I have been
suggesting this for the past month.

I sure am doing my best not to respond *smile*.

Ignore him and he should go away once everybody does not respond to his
nonsensible replies.

Peer pressure can do wonders in this case by virtual of silence or no
replies.

Allen


What's the big deal? I have learned a lot from the threads he started.





randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG
http://www.telemark.net/randallg
Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at:
http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm
Vancouver's famous Kat Kam: http://www.katkam.ca

AIM 5-1-4 g. With Examples

For you, that would be the Airman's Information Manual, Chapter 5 Air
Traffic Prcedures, Section 1 Flight Plans, Part 4 VFR Flight Plan - VFR
Flights, paragraph g. Position Reporting. Example 1 and Example 2

BT

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
BT writes:

From what you tend to know or have about flight following or position
reporting, that same book will (should) have the format for position
reporting.

I've been looking for the format, but I haven't found it thus far.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

randall g schrieb:


What's the big deal? I have learned a lot from the threads he started.


I´m also only a disgusting armchair 'pilot', and I wouldn´t dare to
post any question about real life flying in this highly sophisticated
group, but: Amen to the above statement!

Andreas

Bob,

Humonguous ball of flame extending hundreds of feet
into the air.


Oh, yeah. Sorry, I forgot.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Morgans,

if it would stop all of these stupid questions.


It wouldn't.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

On Nov 21, 4:04 am, Thomas Borchert
wrote:
Morgans,

if it would stop all of these stupid questions.It wouldn't.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

In the professional literature -- peer reviewed journals -- score is
kept by the number of times one's paper is cited. Using that criteria,
mxsmanic would be one of the most respected authors.

I would submit the notions that's
1: why he posts the questions he does,
2: the difference between peer reviewed (or at least moderated)
documents and newsgroups.

The signal to noise ration in general isn't too bad.

Speaking of superior flying, check out this sequence of photos of a
Superhornet blowing a tire on landing.

http://s102164210.onlinehome.us/foru...owtopic=103388

or paste this in your google search window.

Superhornet Mishap at Pensacola Today - ARC Air Discussion Forums