If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"B2431" wrote in message ... Subject: Ping Nesbitt From: Tom Mosher Bertie Temperature totalizer? Did he actually use that phrase? I've been working in one state and living in another so I don't get to peruse the newsgroups very often these days. Yes he did No I didn't. The only peson insisting that a thermocouple totalizer adds temperate was Rick. Besides that, Dan, your bong hit posts about averaging thermocouples had to be you lying. Noone could be that clueless and be allowed anywhere near instrumentation. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51... "B2431" wrote... The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation? Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor. Well... The other day he said something about CAS being "Computed Airspeed", while most of us who fly think of CAS as "Calibrated Airspeed"... Even though it is a lesser-used acronym, mainly limited to the Digital Air Data Computer crowd, "Computed Airspeed" IS a valid description of the acronym/abbreviation... Correct? Yes. Useful? Who knows... ARINC likes Computed Airspeed and I generally go along with them. That way I end up with certification paperwork the ACO understands. Not to say that if some military procurement required me to say, "calibrated airspeed" that I wouldn't. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Jan 2004 04:58:49 GMT, B2431 wrote:
The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation? The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot? -Jeff B. yeff at erols dot com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Yeff" wrote in message ... On 25 Jan 2004 04:58:49 GMT, B2431 wrote: The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation? The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot? That is because it is not me that is the idiot. The irony is rich. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "B2431" wrote in message ... My theory is he's just insecure. If he sent my employer anything I have said in this or other newsgroup they would laugh since I know my stuff. Dan, you just finnished demopnstrating you are incompetent in the thermocouple thread. You also bought into the Knoyle archive troll, which indicates you are incompetent over a wide area of aircraft and aircraft related systems. At no time would I want you anywhere near any airplane carrying any passenger. I appreciate your mentioning my name once in a while but you keep forgetting to mention the url. http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html Jimmy |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... That is because being afiliated with your archive troll is a demonstration of incompetence. Here are refutations of the first two sections of the Knoyle "be an idiot too" archive troll. "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . "Jim Knoyle" wrote: Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure' alone. Or did I misunderstand you? Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox. I know...ain't life a bitch John -- -Gord. Ralph Nesbitt wrote: Ok educate me. As previously stated my experience with "Pitot Tubes & Associated Systems" is due fires on Pitot Covers & associated Red "Remove Before Flight" streamers, plus IFE's due system problems associated with Pitot Tubes. We put those covers on pitot tubes to keep the mud bees out, dippy. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... That is because being afiliated with your archive troll is a demonstration of incompetence. Here are refutations of the first two sections of the Knoyle "be an idiot too" archive troll. "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . "Jim Knoyle" wrote: Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure' alone. Or did I misunderstand you? Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox. I know...ain't life a bitch John -- -Gord. Ralph Nesbitt wrote: Ok educate me. As previously stated my experience with "Pitot Tubes & Associated Systems" is due fires on Pitot Covers & associated Red "Remove Before Flight" streamers, plus IFE's due system problems associated with Pitot Tubes. We put those covers on pitot tubes to keep the mud bees out, dippy. So did I once during a labor dispute. Square that with your statement: ( direct quote ) "No pitot tube silly bunny. It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane flying as much as a 727." There you go again, bad-mouthing the Boeing engineers. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Tarver Engineering"
"John R Weiss" wrote in message news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51... "B2431" wrote... The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation? Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor. Tarver, I never said that. Making things up is not a good way to make yourself look good. Let's see if you can find where I said anything even remotely like that. Quote it for us in its entirety, not with the usual tarver editing. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PING...Wizard of Draws | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | September 11th 04 02:33 AM |
Ping Nesbitt | Tarver Engineering | Home Built | 5 | January 25th 04 01:32 PM |
Ping Daryl: About Buckley AFB | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 4 | August 19th 03 12:04 AM |
Ping Gordon: Jagdgruppe 50 question | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 2 | August 9th 03 09:10 PM |
PING: Gordon - Cracks on the Kaman Seasprite | Yeff | Military Aviation | 1 | July 20th 03 05:57 PM |