If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
On 24 Jan 2007 15:09:09 -0800, "Udo" wrote:
I am do not know about the tape, but a 6"-7" pee tube could generate about .2 lb of drag at 85 kt, hence a one day contest base on a 1000 points, all else being equal, could reduce the points count by 12-15 points. .... not to mention the significant loss of wing loading due to the weight that goes overboard through the pee tube... Bye Andreas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
But he's right - that's why I use pee bags, so I only have to deal with the
loss of wing load :-) "Andreas Maurer" wrote in message ... On 24 Jan 2007 15:09:09 -0800, "Udo" wrote: I am do not know about the tape, but a 6"-7" pee tube could generate about .2 lb of drag at 85 kt, hence a one day contest base on a 1000 points, all else being equal, could reduce the points count by 12-15 points. ... not to mention the significant loss of wing loading due to the weight that goes overboard through the pee tube... Bye Andreas |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
Yeh, I considered both of these effects (mass and drag) when I decided
to keep the yellow ballast on board and dump after landing. Andy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
On Jan 25, 5:14 am, Andreas Maurer wrote: On 24 Jan 2007 15:09:09 -0800, "Udo" wrote: I am do not know about the tape, but a 6"-7" pee tube could generate about .2 lb of drag at 85 kt, hence a one day contest base on a 1000 points, all else being equal, could reduce the points count by 12-15 points.... not to mention the significant loss of wing loading due to the weight that goes overboard through the pee tube... Bye Andreas To heck with the drag, convenience is king, but you can reduce that drag of the tube to 1.2 to 1.5 points a day if you fair it. In the past pilots did find that incorporating the tube on the inside of the gear door was not a good solution either. The drag caused by lowering the gear partly caused overall more drag over time. Naturally the older you get the more drag you generate, as you have too lower the gear more often, as well each session takes longer. Also you have to remember to lower the gear. Udo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
Technically, wouldn't ejecting a liquid under pressure to the rear
create a propulsion vector. Younger guys would have an advantage in both M and V ... older guys would would have more propulsion episodes. AndyI am do not know about the tape, but a 6"-7" pee tube could generate about .2 lb of drag at 85 kt, hence a one day contest base on a 1000 points, all else being equal, could reduce the points count by 12-15 points. Udo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
On Jan 25, 10:14 am, "Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote: Technically, wouldn't ejecting a liquid under pressure to the rear create a propulsion vector. Younger guys would have an advantage in both M and V ... older guys would would have more propulsion episodes. Exactly, Corky installed it on his 27, now mine, in that fashion, facing back. I will install an accumulator and will heat it with access heat from within the cockpit and expel it under higher pressure and make it a one episode thing on final glide. Udo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
Gosh, is it April already?
-- Hartley Falbaum wrote in message oups.com... Tape drag not a huge effect, but can add up to 10 or 15 points over the course of a contest. That's why many top Euopean contest pilots use a special putty compound to smooth over the tape edges. It's a bit tedious for a single day's flying, but if you're going to stay assembled for a week it's not so bad. On Jan 22, 3:13 pm, "ContestID67" wrote: No, this is not SPAM as the subject line might lead one to believe. ;-) I have seen lots of wing tape. Many of the advertisements are for very thin and flexible tape which conforms to the curves of the wing. However, the cost can be prohibitive, especially if you assemble often. A friend of mine (very high time & competitive pilot) uses 3M electrical tape. We got to talking about it and we agreed that this high quality tape is very flexible, has good temperature properties and not very expensive. Easy to find also. The only issue then was the thickness. Wouldn't the edge of the think tape affect performance? The friend pointed out (correctly) that the tape runs perpenticular to the span of the wing and thus the tape's edge is parallel to the air flow. Thus no performance issues. Any thoughts? What about with bug whippers? Enjoy, John PS There is one issue with 1/2" wide electrical tape - whether it is wide enough to bridge the gap. It all depends, I suppose, on the fit and finish of your glider. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
You can look forward to it, eventually. It helps if
the cockpit seat is reclined a good bit; lying down helps us spend 8 hours in bed without going. I'm down to about 4 hrs in the cockpit without relief and I have about 18 years on you. At 17:44 25 January 2007, Jcarlyle wrote: Perhaps I'm just lucky, but I've never felt any need for an in-flight relief system. Is this urge to go something most pilots are subject to, or just a sub-set? Or is it something I can look forward to? I'm not trying to start anything, I'd just like to know if there are others like me. For the record, I'm 58, I'll drink up to 48 ounces of water during flights, I've been airborne up to 6 hours, and I fly in eastern Pennsylvania. -John |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Wing Tape - Does Thickness Affect Performance?
You would not like the results of a ruptured bladder if you crash on
landing! It can be (and has been) fatal, as it is sometimes not detected till too late. -- Hartley Falbaum "Nyal Williams" wrote in message ... You can look forward to it, eventually. It helps if the cockpit seat is reclined a good bit; lying down helps us spend 8 hours in bed without going. I'm down to about 4 hrs in the cockpit without relief and I have about 18 years on you. At 17:44 25 January 2007, Jcarlyle wrote: Perhaps I'm just lucky, but I've never felt any need for an in-flight relief system. Is this urge to go something most pilots are subject to, or just a sub-set? Or is it something I can look forward to? I'm not trying to start anything, I'd just like to know if there are others like me. For the record, I'm 58, I'll drink up to 48 ounces of water during flights, I've been airborne up to 6 hours, and I fly in eastern Pennsylvania. -John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 161 | September 25th 03 07:35 AM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |