A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Safety Rules



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 18th 03, 06:13 PM
Pat Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Safety Rules



This post is about rules intended to enhance safety. It is not
about tasking or scoring or the philosophy of selecting a
winner.

"Safety rules" can be divided into two categories:

1. Rules that enhance the safety of everyone (e.g. the
left-hand circling rule)

2. Rules that are targeted (primarily) toward new competitors.

Experienced pilots tend to appreciate the first kind of rule,
but not the second. You don't get to be an experienced pilot by
disregarding safety issues.

When a new rule of the second type is proposed, the response is
predictable. New competitors support the rule because it
removes their temptation to take new risks. Experienced pilots
oppose the rule because it adds complication without any
benefit.

When a survey is taken, the opinion of the new competitors wins,
simply because they are in the majority.

There is a strong temptation to adopt rules of the second type,
not only because of majority opinion, but also because it is
difficult to argue against safety.

As these rules get adopted, the experienced pilots (the
contenders in any competition) become less and less happy.

When the contenders are unhappy and begin to drop out, the
entire sport suffers.

The Rules Committee should be very, very careful about adopting
safety rules of the second type. Even if the majority opinion
supports them.



  #2  
Old September 18th 03, 08:18 PM
Duane Eisenbeiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Pat Russell" wrote in message
...

................
When a new rule of the second type is proposed, the response is
predictable. New competitors support the rule because it
removes their temptation to take new risks. ...................


I would think that the "temptation to take risks" would be removed through
training and judgement not one individual's interpretation of some rule.

Duane


  #3  
Old September 18th 03, 11:30 PM
Pat Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Duane said:
I would think that the "temptation to take risks" would be removed through
training and judgement not one individual's interpretation of some rule.


I don't think it works this way. Training and judgement
determine how we behave in the face of temptation. The only way
to remove a temptation is to change a rule.

  #4  
Old September 20th 03, 02:58 PM
Chris OCallaghan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom and Mike,

Check out the MASA ops manual, available on our web site. http://www.m-asa.org

Cheers,

OC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. Larry Dighera Piloting 0 February 22nd 04 03:58 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) Mark Navarre Soaring 15 September 25th 03 01:13 PM
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? Jim Piloting 10 August 13th 03 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.