A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New winch height record



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old November 29th 07, 04:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 245
Default New winch height record & Retrieve winches

On Nov 29, 2:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
We actually tested the power required to retrieve Spectra and the starter
motor is way more powerful than needed. Not sure what your problem is at
Lasham.


Derek will answer for himself, but I expect they retrieve against the
pay-out brake on the winch, as per normal operation. If you don't, the
drum will keep turning under its own momentum when the retrieve stops
and you'll get cable everywhere. Not good.


The cost of Spectra is more like three times the cost of steel not 5 times -
I checked the prices this morning. It takes a LOT of power to pull steel
cable across an airfield - I can pull a mile of Spectra with one finger.

We need verifiable data from retrieve winches. Your tests at Lasham are not
verifiable since you did no controlled experiments.


Having been to Lasham myself and talked to people there (though not
yet witnessed the retrieve winch itself operating), I'm perfectly
satisfied that what Derek says about the performance of both UHMWPE
and retrieve winches is correct.


Dan
  #52  
Old November 29th 07, 05:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default New winch height record & Retrieve winches


"Dan G" wrote in message
...
On Nov 29, 2:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
We actually tested the power required to retrieve Spectra and the starter
motor is way more powerful than needed. Not sure what your problem is at
Lasham.


Derek will answer for himself, but I expect they retrieve against the
pay-out brake on the winch, as per normal operation. If you don't, the
drum will keep turning under its own momentum when the retrieve stops
and you'll get cable everywhere. Not good.


Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to,
they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to prevent
tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension.

Spectra/Dyneema doesn't ball up and tangle like steel so you use much
lighter braking force. In fact, with tension control used for braking, very
light reverse torque is more than enough to prevent problems so very, very
little force is needed to pull out a Spectra cable from a winch designed to
take advantage of Spectra/Dyneema.

To get all the benefits of Spectra/Dyneema, you have to not only modify the
winch, you have to change operational techniques. Just throwing it on an
old steel cable winch and using steel cable operating techniques is
guaranteed to fail - as it did at Lasham.


The cost of Spectra is more like three times the cost of steel not 5
times -
I checked the prices this morning. It takes a LOT of power to pull steel
cable across an airfield - I can pull a mile of Spectra with one finger.

We need verifiable data from retrieve winches. Your tests at Lasham are
not
verifiable since you did no controlled experiments.


Having been to Lasham myself and talked to people there (though not
yet witnessed the retrieve winch itself operating), I'm perfectly
satisfied that what Derek says about the performance of both UHMWPE
and retrieve winches is correct.


Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out faster
than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many
other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points. The
difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the
neccessary changes.

Bill Daniels




  #53  
Old November 29th 07, 08:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Sönke Gutzlaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default New winch height record


"Dan G" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
On Nov 28, 6:22 pm, "Sönke Gutzlaff" wrote:
950m steel cable + 350hp winch + 20km/h wind + ASK21 = 750m or 78%.
More high was possible, but airspace class C begins at 750m above our
airfield so I had to release the cable.

I think the ASK21 gets the best high on winchlaunch. Our DG1000 always
gets
25% less high.

Greetings,
Sönke


Sönke, what speed do you fly at on the winch, and how much back
pressure do you apply to the stick?


Around 100km/h and the stick full pulled back (I know that's not the optimal
position).
Another helpfull fact is, that the wind is getting stronger when you get
higher so the plane is flying like a kite.
But there are only 1 or 2 days during the year when we have such perfect
wind. Normaly we are reaching around 500m with the 21.

Sönke


  #54  
Old November 29th 07, 08:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 245
Default New winch height record & Retrieve winches

On Nov 29, 5:38 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to,
they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to prevent
tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension.


The pay-out brake is not to keep the line under tension, it's to stop
the drum when the retrieve stops, or the drum keeps turning and paying
out cable which forms great big loops hanging down from the drum. A
drum of UHMWPE will of course be much lighter than a steel one, but
the drum itself is heavy enough. If the brake is weak you have to tow
very slowly, which is frustrating.


Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out faster
than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many
other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points. The
difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the
neccessary changes.


Lasham isn't the only club that tried UHMWPE and abadonded it.
Pocklington tried it too - with a brand new Skylaunch winch - and also
abandoned it. Another club I know well is only using up their current
stock of it before reverting to steel. A number of sites had initially
very favourable results with UHMWPE but I've never seen any follow-up
results, which were promised by the BGA but have never materialised
(afaik).


Dan
  #55  
Old November 29th 07, 08:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 245
Default New winch height record

On Nov 29, 8:13 pm, "Sönke Gutzlaff" wrote:
Around 100km/h and the stick full pulled back (I know that's not the optimal
position)


Judging by your results that's optimal ;-). However at 54 knots and
full back stick you must have been fairly close to the stall. With the
K21's hook being pretty much on the CG point (unlike, say, a K13's
quite forwards hook) I'd worry about what happens on a cable break. If
you were really switched on I expect it would be fine but with a
moment's hesitation you could end up very nose-high without much
speed...


Dan
  #56  
Old November 29th 07, 10:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Sönke Gutzlaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default New winch height record


"Dan G" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
On Nov 29, 8:13 pm, "Sönke Gutzlaff" wrote:
Around 100km/h and the stick full pulled back (I know that's not the
optimal
position)


Judging by your results that's optimal ;-). However at 54 knots and
full back stick you must have been fairly close to the stall. With the
K21's hook being pretty much on the CG point (unlike, say, a K13's
quite forwards hook) I'd worry about what happens on a cable break. If
you were really switched on I expect it would be fine but with a
moment's hesitation you could end up very nose-high without much
speed...


I've learned that 100km/h is fast enough, our instructors even say 90km/h
ist the perfect speed for the 21 to gain maximun high.
I had lot of cable breaks this year and no problems with the speed. You've
only to react fast enough. And the 21 is a very friendly flying plane (with
our other planes, especially the ASW19 I prefer higher speeds on winch
launch) and you normaly are not pulling the stick full back before you reach
the safety high.


  #57  
Old November 29th 07, 11:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Del C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default New winch height record & Retrieve winches

Er, did you actually read what I wrote Bill? I said
that UHMWPE cable is good stuff, and becomes doubly
advantageous for retrieve winching, where you are pulling
two cables into the air, and for longer runs. It also
doesn't try to untwist when new, unlike stranded steel
cable, or kink like piano wire. As Dan G has pointed
out it is also safer to handle.

The main downside is cost, plus the fact that on short
runs cable weight is not much of an issue and you don't
get that much of a height advantage by using synthetic
cable. We had a period at Lasham when one of our winches
had synthetic cable on one drum and steel cable on
the other, so we were able to do direct comparisons
on alternate launches in the same conditions. As a
percentage of the cable run in still evening air, we
averaged about 38% for steel cable and 41% for synthetic.
For a 4000ft run this works out at 1520 ft for steel
and 1640ft for synthetic, so there was an advantage
of just over 100ft in using synthetic. Off course the
longer the run the greater the advantage would become,
but then how many clubs have a winch run of more than
5000 feet?

Lasham didn't just throw UHMWPE cable onto an existing
winch! We had a number of modifications done in preparation,
to prevent drum crushing and to smooth the rollers,
as recommended by Skylaunch. Our Retrieve winch came
fitted with some very light, orange coloured, synthetic
string, but as I have already said that lasted no time
at all. The one synthetic main cable we tried actually
lasted longer than a steel cable, giving 2500 launches
as compared with about 1900 launches, but this was
not enough to offset the extra cost. I should point
out that we normally launch across two 50 metre wide,
extremely abrasive and rough WW2 concrete runways,
so we suffer high cable wear rates at the best of times.
There is a plan to dig these runways up (when there
is a local building project going on and we can get
a good price for the hard core) and replace them with
smooth narrow tarmac strips for winter operations.
We may then reconsider synthetic winch cables.

The retrieve winch pulls the cable back at about 50mph.
If you don't provide some pay-out braking, not only
will the main winch drum probably over-run when you
stop pulling, but the cable has enough momentum that
it won't stop when you cut the throttle on the retrieve
winch and you pull the rings into the rollers. This
has happened to me on one occasion as a retrieve winch
driver when the main winch driver didn't apply enough
braking. The Skylaunch retrieve winch is powerful enough
to pull back any sort of cable over any reasonable
distance.

I have carried a number of comparison tests in the
last year which I have reported on the Yahoo Winch
Launching Group website. OK I couldn't measure as many
parameters as I would have liked, but they were generally
carried out on relatively still evenings (I instruct
on an evening group) with the same winch and winch
drivers and a small group of pilots, so they should
be fairly indicative. Sometimes I just asked other
pilots and instructors how high they getting under
various circumstances. When we were using the retrieve
winch (we still often vehicle retrieve in the evening)
the most interesting comparison was between the last
few launches and the very final one when we disconnect
the retrieve cable and launch normally, so the cable
can be drawn fully into the winch so we can put it
away. That is how I derived the approximate height
loss attributable to the retrieve winch. At least I'm
not just drawing computer generated curves on a graph,
derived from questionable mathematical models, unlike
certain contributors to the group who have little or
no practical experience of winch launching!

Del Copeland

At 17:42 29 November 2007, Bill Daniels wrote:

'Dan G' wrote in message

.com...
On Nov 29, 2:57 pm, 'Bill Daniels' wrote:
We actually tested the power required to retrieve
Spectra and the starter
motor is way more powerful than needed. Not sure
what your problem is at
Lasham.


Derek will answer for himself, but I expect they retrieve
against the
pay-out brake on the winch, as per normal operation.
If you don't, the
drum will keep turning under its own momentum when
the retrieve stops
and you'll get cable everywhere. Not good.


Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake
- they have to,
they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel
under tension to prevent
tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension.

Spectra/Dyneema doesn't ball up and tangle like steel
so you use much
lighter braking force. In fact, with tension control
used for braking, very
light reverse torque is more than enough to prevent
problems so very, very
little force is needed to pull out a Spectra cable
from a winch designed to
take advantage of Spectra/Dyneema.

To get all the benefits of Spectra/Dyneema, you have
to not only modify the
winch, you have to change operational techniques.
Just throwing it on an
old steel cable winch and using steel cable operating
techniques is
guaranteed to fail - as it did at Lasham.


The cost of Spectra is more like three times the cost
of steel not 5
times -
I checked the prices this morning. It takes a LOT
of power to pull steel
cable across an airfield - I can pull a mile of Spectra
with one finger.

We need verifiable data from retrieve winches. Your
tests at Lasham are
not
verifiable since you did no controlled experiments.


Having been to Lasham myself and talked to people
there (though not
yet witnessed the retrieve winch itself operating),
I'm perfectly
satisfied that what Derek says about the performance
of both UHMWPE
and retrieve winches is correct.


Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive,
wears out faster
than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height.
Evedence from many
other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary
on all points. The
difference is that successful sites did their homework
and made all the
neccessary changes.

Bill Daniels








  #58  
Old November 29th 07, 11:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default New winch height record & Retrieve winches


"Dan G" wrote in message
...
On Nov 29, 5:38 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to,
they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to
prevent
tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension.


The pay-out brake is not to keep the line under tension, it's to stop
the drum when the retrieve stops, or the drum keeps turning and paying
out cable which forms great big loops hanging down from the drum. A
drum of UHMWPE will of course be much lighter than a steel one, but
the drum itself is heavy enough. If the brake is weak you have to tow
very slowly, which is frustrating.


I bet it's frustrating. Why don't you re-engineer it so it works right.

You need to re-think tension. Steel needs to be kept under tension any time
you are moving it. If it is just laying in the grass, it's still under a
little tension due to friction with the grass.

If it takes 70hp to pull out the cable, you're using way too much brake.
Tension control winches use the hydraulic motor to provide light reverse
torque, not a brake. It takes very little reverse torque to prevent over
runs with UHMWPE.



Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out
faster
than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many
other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points.
The
difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the
neccessary changes.


Lasham isn't the only club that tried UHMWPE and abadonded it.
Pocklington tried it too - with a brand new Skylaunch winch - and also
abandoned it. Another club I know well is only using up their current
stock of it before reverting to steel. A number of sites had initially
very favourable results with UHMWPE but I've never seen any follow-up
results, which were promised by the BGA but have never materialised
(afaik).


The start of this thread was about some very talented folkes in Belgium who
set a release height record using UHMWPE on a winch designed for it. UHMWPE
is a spectacular success as a winch rope. It beats steel on all counts
including wear and life. In fact it lasts long enough to actually be
cheaper than steel on a per launch basis. BUT, you have to understand it
AND you winch has to be designed for it.

Skylaunch is a great steel cable winch. However, it would need a lot of
modifications to make it a successful UHMWPE winch. I sincerely hope they
do this since it would be easier than trying to convince the world that
UHMWPE doesn't work.

UHMWPE has never failed anyone but some people trying to use it have failed
to use it properly. If you want to know how to use it right, talk to the
people who succeeded not the ones who failed. Make a call to Belgium.

Bill Daniels


  #59  
Old November 29th 07, 11:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default New winch height record & Retrieve winches


"Del C" wrote in message
...
Er, did you actually read what I wrote Bill?


No. I usually don't since I've found it's mostly BS.


  #60  
Old November 29th 07, 11:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Del C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default New winch height record

The K21 seems to climb as well as anything on a winch
launch, despite being a bit big and heavy. Probably
only a K8 will beat it.

We have a couple of DG1000s and they don't climb quite
as well. If you pull the stick well back, a sort of
pitching motion seems to set in as though the elevator
is stalling.

Del Copeland

At 21:18 28 November 2007, Dan G wrote:
On Nov 28, 6:22 pm, 'S=F6nke Gutzlaff' wrote:
950m steel cable + 350hp winch + 20km/h wind + ASK21
=3D 750m or 78%.
More high was possible, but airspace class C begins
at 750m above our
airfield so I had to release the cable.

I think the ASK21 gets the best high on winchlaunch.
Our DG1000 always get=

s
25% less high.

Greetings,
S=F6nke


S=F6nke, what speed do you fly at on the winch, and
how much back
pressure do you apply to the stick?


Dan




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to get maximum height on a winch launch? Dan G Soaring 38 December 22nd 16 12:29 AM
Winch launch speed versus height gain Neil Soaring 20 November 9th 07 12:57 AM
Record Highs/Record Lows Jay Honeck Piloting 12 October 12th 06 01:27 AM
Perlan height record in Argentina Charles Yeates Soaring 3 September 1st 06 12:59 PM
LIppmann reports a 950 meter winch launch with their Dynatec winch line - anything higher? Bill Daniels Soaring 20 December 27th 04 12:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.