A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » General Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Concorde - join the campaign



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 5th 06, 12:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Concorde - join the campaign

On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:20:57 GMT, Bob Matthews wrote:

The next "concorde" will be a near orbit to destination craft.
I would not hold your breath waiting for it. You will see it
in a Bond movie long before you can ride one.


For a flight from New York to Singapore, with a peak speed of 7,000 mph,
what sort of G-forces would the passengers be subjected to? I realize
that this would vary with the profile, but it sounds like the beverage
cart would be a hand full.


Depends on how you get there. Back of the envelope, 1/2 G of thrust would get
the plane up to cruise speed in about 10 minutes. Cabin gravity would be at
about 1.12 Gs total. Mind you, it'd be a pretty steep "slope". :-)

If you need solid-fuel rockets to boost you to speed, of course, acceleration is
a lot harder.

Ron Wanttaja
  #2  
Old June 5th 06, 12:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Concorde - join the campaign

Ron Wanttaja wrote:
Depends on how you get there. Back of the envelope, 1/2 G of thrust would get
the plane up to cruise speed in about 10 minutes. Cabin gravity would be at
about 1.12 Gs total. Mind you, it'd be a pretty steep "slope". :-)


That would be no worse than a bit uncomfortable for most people. The more
interesting scenario is at the other end. Negative 0.5G horizontal would
probably require flipping the seats around so you face aft. The
alternative would be to truss up all the pax like chickens on a spit to
keep their limbs from flopping around.
  #3  
Old June 5th 06, 03:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Concorde - join the campaign

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:57:06 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:

Ron Wanttaja wrote:
Depends on how you get there. Back of the envelope, 1/2 G of thrust would get
the plane up to cruise speed in about 10 minutes. Cabin gravity would be at
about 1.12 Gs total. Mind you, it'd be a pretty steep "slope". :-)


That would be no worse than a bit uncomfortable for most people. The more
interesting scenario is at the other end. Negative 0.5G horizontal would
probably require flipping the seats around so you face aft. The
alternative would be to truss up all the pax like chickens on a spit to
keep their limbs from flopping around.


No, we presume the vehicle is basically re-entering at the other end. It can do
that over a longer period, with lower accelerations. Probably would want the
pax to be wearing shoulder harnesses, though.

Ron Wanttaja
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Concorde - join the campaign Ron Wanttaja General Aviation 0 June 4th 06 05:24 PM
Concorde - join the campaign John Dallman Naval Aviation 0 June 4th 06 02:42 PM
Concorde - join the campaign Mike Piloting 1 June 4th 06 03:02 AM
Concorde - join the campaign Jim Naval Aviation 2 June 3rd 06 10:27 PM
Concorde - join the campaign Z Goudie Soaring 0 June 3rd 06 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.