Question for the group in Hawker

Charles Lindbergh a écrit dans
:

Remember, the Lancaster had four Merlin engines and it was no beauty.
But definitely closer to beauty than uglyness !

--
D520
Delta Reflex : http://bdd.deltareflex.com
Light aviation : http://tagazous.free.fr
Roundels of the World :
http://cocardes.monde.online.fr/v2html/en/accueil.html

M;-5T':?6XGX_\@U-)^Q7XQEC&=5T+K@'[1/D?^0:?;_L4^,$D);5-".!A3Y\
MV?\`T34LW[&/C#S"1J6A`KQ_Q\3_P#D*J,G[(?C+)5+W0%(R.;J?!]_]34T
M/[(GBY%R;W0?,V[1_I,Q`_\`(-.M_P!D_P`;":3=J&@E0-J'[1-D?^0:NV/[
M(7B_'[S4-#W$X#+/-G'_`'ZJV/V4/%RS^1]OT0!1MW";G\/*J2']D'Q?+,Z
MKJ.A+GI^^F_^-5(W[('C%F7&J:'E?EVF;&/^_520_L=+FN=_\`:FBA6XXF
MFR/_`"%23_L=^+68XU/10K'`(GF!`_[]58C_`&0/%J1A?[5T8G&`3/-_\:J.
M+]CGQ=YI9]7T;+$#Y9IL8_[]4Z]_91\5:8Q]OT9MYY'GS`8_P"_53VW['_B
M:5@XU'1U#'A?/F./_(5))^R%XH%X&&HZ*2"3--D#V_=5N6G[)7B:.+C4='(
M;KF67/\`Z+IX_9(\3'(34](0,/\`GK+_`/&Z=%^R;XE:W*/J.D^8QZB:7&/^
M_=17'[(_B)(\1:AI`)W32XQ_W[KN_AA^S]XGT&[:*74=,:WD&2J22'!]LH
M*]//P5U4R+F^L]IXZO\`_$TX?!/4\D&^M".W+?X4R#X(ZNK`F_L@#Z%\_P#H
$,6I
7;'\JU+;X0ZC%=IB\M"`X(R6!Z_2O_]D=
`
end

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:06:02 +0100, D. St-Sanvain
wrote:

Charles Lindbergh a écrit dans
m :

Remember, the Lancaster had four Merlin engines and it was no beauty.
But definitely closer to beauty than uglyness !

I disagree, but the Lanc is certainly not as ugly as these 13 aircraft.

http://www.historynet.com/the-13-ugliest-airplanes.htm?

On 25/02/2014 13:14, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:06:02 +0100, D. St-Sanvain
wrote:

Charles Lindbergh a écrit dans
:

Remember, the Lancaster had four Merlin engines and it was no beauty.
But definitely closer to beauty than uglyness !

I disagree, but the Lanc is certainly not as ugly as these 13 aircraft.

http://www.historynet.com/the-13-ugliest-airplanes.htm?


As Andrew Chapiln nearly said, Degustibus non est disputandum; or even
chacun à son goût. It's all a question of taste.

By no means all of those 13 were designed with an ugly pencil. Some
definitely were, and others were just a bit on the utilitarian side.

--
Peter