If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... It seems that I did not think the implications all the way through before I pressed the "send" button. Running the C85 at 3200 RPM should result in around 125% power, so that a cruise setting of 85% power would be around 65% of the "available" power. Therefore, a clean little airplane like the Tailwind would actually have a greater (rather than less) surplus thrust for take off and initial climb. The note of caution would be that full throttle would be take off only, and not maximum continuous; so the pilot would have to understand the limitations and treat it like a high performance engine rather than like a trainer engine. Peter Most of the faster homebuilts with fixed pitch props don't generate maximum power at takeoff simply because the props have so much pitch the engine can't spin 'em to peak rpm. The EZ crowd discovered this years ago. If I wanted to spend a couple of hours reading old issues of "Canard Pusher" or whatever the appropriate newsletter was, I could find a cite by the Rutan Aircraft Factory where they recommend a slightly underpitched prop which would allow more than the *certified* max RPM. This was primarily done to allow the engine to generate more RPM and power at takeoff. In my 0-320 RV-6, the engine only turns 2100 rpm on takeoff. As the airplane accelerates, the rpm's increase as does my climb rate. The airplane climbs better at 125 knots than 100, simply because the engine is generating quite a few more horsepower. KB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|