A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

302 wind calculation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 30th 10, 11:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
T8
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 302 wind calculation

On Mar 29, 9:45*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Mar 29, 9:31*am, T8 wrote:



On Mar 29, 11:29 am, Darryl Ramm *wrote:


For the 180 degree wrong problem, any system that uses track and TAS/
GS difference calculations risks being 180 degrees wrong it it just
has that difference on two reciprocal tracks. If you run straight down
a ridge and do a rapid turn back the other way and fly the same track
back the other way there are two perfectly equivalent trigonometric
solutions which will give the wind from either direction. The flight
computer has absolutely no idea what direction you are crabbing the
glider into the wind.


I understand the problem of very limited information. *This is a
different problem :-).


In this case picture wind from 360, trip out on ridge with track 270,
303 shows wind from 360 @ 12, relative wind 90 degrees, arrow points
left (i.e. "wind blowing on glider" from right). *On the reverse trip,
having failed to get a wind update, the
computer now shows track 90, wind from 360 @ 12, relative wind 90
degrees, arrow points left. *See the issue? *Even in the absence of
updated wind, the relative wind should be showing 270 based on old
wind, new track. *I verified this behavior again yesterday, turning
through 45 degrees (slowly), watching track change, seeing relative
wind stay constant despite changing track until the device updated the
wind. [edit: I managed to mung the tracks up the first time].


I have never noticed behavior like that. I'll look for that next time
I play around. Seems like a simple firmware bug that maybe might be
reproducible. Did Dave Ellis have any comments on this behavior?

Darryl


I described the behavior much as I have here. Dave was puzzled, but
concluded that my 302 was not broken.

I am able to reproduce this bug at will.

*All* of the issues I see with the 302 have the look and feel of
software problems.

-T8
  #22  
Old April 3rd 10, 01:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
T8
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 302 wind calculation

On Mar 30, 6:56*am, T8 wrote:

I am able to reproduce this bug at will.


And here it is http://tinyurl.com/ygtwbvf

Ridge on the left, correct wind showing in XCSoar in PDA (12 knots
from 090 relative), 303 showing 4 kts from 333 relative.

The wind calculation performance of XCSoar, using data from the 302,
is absolutely outstanding. It's fast, it's accurate, it doesn't cough
up garbage. The 302/303 is *buggy*.

What's missing in all these schemes is a display of the age of the
vector wind calculation on the main screen.

-Evan Ludeman / T8

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
302 wind calculation AK Soaring 0 March 26th 10 02:47 AM
XCSoar wind calculation Martin Gregorie[_5_] Soaring 11 October 8th 09 05:26 AM
SeeYou Wind Calculation Ken Kochanski (KK) Soaring 3 June 3rd 09 06:47 AM
Vector Wind, Relative Wind calculation C 302/303 [email protected] Soaring 2 December 9th 08 07:23 PM
LX4000 wind calculation AttentionLEcureuil Soaring 2 June 23rd 04 04:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.