If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... I don't think so. From the AIM 3-2-4, 3. Arrival or Through Flight Entry Requirements. ... NOTE- 1. If the controller responds to a radio call with, "(aircraft callsign) standby," radio communications have been established and the pilot can enter the Class C airspace. 2. If workload or traffic conditions prevent immediate provision of Class C services, the controller will inform the pilot to remain outside the Class C airspace until conditions permit the services to be provided. 3. It is important to understand that if the controller responds to the initial radio call without using the aircraft identification, radio communications have not been established and the pilot may not enter the Class C airspace. EXAMPLE- 1. [Aircraft callsign] "remain outside the Class Charlie airspace and standby." 2. "Aircraft calling Dulles approach control, standby." The material you quoted does not support your position. I think that this makes it pretty clear that any acknowledgement of a specific aircraft without a specific caution to remain clear is sufficient radio contact to allow clearance into a Class C. Yes, but that's not the case here. In this case there was acknowledgement of a specific aircraft with a specific instruction to remain clear of the Class C airspace. Using your example of a subsequent instruction implicitly canceling a previous instruction applies here as well. It doesn't apply in this case because the instruction to remain clear of the Class C airspace was the only instruction issued. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
remain clear instructions end.. when you receive a "cleared through or
cleared to enter" instruction... just asking questions to figure out where you are going.. does not indicate permission to enter "did not assign any vectors".. fist clue "did not repeat the remain clear".. why repeat a clearance you are already complying with.. that's radio congestion presumed "understanding" is like assuming.. not good BT "Arden Prinz" wrote in message om... Recently I was departing a small airport (with no control tower) which was underneath the class C shelf area of a somewhat larger airport (which is an air force base). Immediately before departing, I called the approach controller for the class C airspace and told him that I was departing and would like flight following. I was actually hoping to fly straight over the larger airport (they weren't busy due to the time). The approach controller assigned me a transponder code and told me "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace". So after I took of, I started flying a route taking me around the class C area that extended to the surface. Well, the controller then called me by my tail number and asked some questions (I don't remember exactly what -- it might have been my expected cruising altitude and aircraft type, I think he may have also said radar contact, although I can't remember the specifics right now). As soon as this happened, I turned and headed directly toward my destination, taking me across the class C to the surface airspace. A fellow pilot was with me, and he later mentioned that thought I might have violated the controller's instructions. Hmmmm... That brings up a question --- when does the "remain clear of class C airspace" instruction end? I figured that since he called my by tail number and was clearly communicating with me and didn't assign any vectors or repeat his direction to remain clear, that it was now understood that I could enter. The controller didn't give any indication that I had done anything wrong, but I want to be sure that I understand this for the future. So ... if I'm told to remain clear in the future, WHEN does that end? Thank-you. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net... "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:uGLXb.186249$U%5.916363@attbi_s03... Who said the pilot didn't respond? I did. ATC: "Cessna 12345, remain clear of Class C". N12345: "Roger". N12345 flies around the Class C to some destination, So the pilot changed his mind about entering the Class C airspace? The pilot was told not to enter the Class C, so he went around it, with no further relevant communication with ATC. Then he came back the next day and again established two-way communication. Did the remain-clear instruction expire in the meantime? If so, when? --Gary |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Maule Driver" wrote in message om...
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message om... I've had this happen to me a few times. After a "remain clear" instruction, the controller would say something like "cancel previous restriction, proceed on course". The "remain clear" instruction does not expire until the controller explicitly cancels it. Except in this case, the "remain clear" was issued before a VFR departure and is meaningless. Conversely, if the ATC and the pilot established radio contact with tail number ID included *just before departure*, it does not mean that the pilot is cleared to depart and enter the Class C. That radio contact and it's implied clearance is equally meaningless. The communications aren't meaningful until the pilot is in flight. . I don't think so. When tower clears an aircraft for takeoff (at the primary class C airport or from a satellite airport), the aircraft is cleared for entering the Class C airspace. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
In article IkSXb.18910$IF1.1264@fed1read01, BTIZ
wrote: remain clear instructions end.. when you receive a "cleared through or cleared to enter" instruction... just asking questions to figure out where you are going.. does not indicate permission to enter You should never hear a controller utter the words "Cleared to enter (or cleared through)the Class C airspace". You do not need a clearance to enter Class C, only establishment of two-way radio communications and a Mode C transponder. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:IkSXb.18910$IF1.1264@fed1read01... remain clear instructions end.. when you receive a "cleared through or cleared to enter" instruction... just asking questions to figure out where you are going.. does not indicate permission to enter "did not assign any vectors".. fist clue "did not repeat the remain clear".. why repeat a clearance you are already complying with.. that's radio congestion presumed "understanding" is like assuming.. not good BT This is not true. An explicit clearance to enter a class C is not necessary - only radio contact. If, after having said "remain clear" the controller comes back with "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that is an implicit clearance to enter the class C. All that is required is radio contact. Controller's know the rules. If they don't want you in their airspace, they will ignore you or repeat the "remain clear" instruction. ------------------------------- Travis "Arden Prinz" wrote in message om... Recently I was departing a small airport (with no control tower) which was underneath the class C shelf area of a somewhat larger airport (which is an air force base). Immediately before departing, I called the approach controller for the class C airspace and told him that I was departing and would like flight following. I was actually hoping to fly straight over the larger airport (they weren't busy due to the time). The approach controller assigned me a transponder code and told me "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace". So after I took of, I started flying a route taking me around the class C area that extended to the surface. Well, the controller then called me by my tail number and asked some questions (I don't remember exactly what -- it might have been my expected cruising altitude and aircraft type, I think he may have also said radar contact, although I can't remember the specifics right now). As soon as this happened, I turned and headed directly toward my destination, taking me across the class C to the surface airspace. A fellow pilot was with me, and he later mentioned that thought I might have violated the controller's instructions. Hmmmm... That brings up a question --- when does the "remain clear of class C airspace" instruction end? I figured that since he called my by tail number and was clearly communicating with me and didn't assign any vectors or repeat his direction to remain clear, that it was now understood that I could enter. The controller didn't give any indication that I had done anything wrong, but I want to be sure that I understand this for the future. So ... if I'm told to remain clear in the future, WHEN does that end? Thank-you. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Fleischman" wrote in message rthlink.net... You should never hear a controller utter the words "Cleared to enter (or cleared through)the Class C airspace". You do not need a clearance to enter Class C, only establishment of two-way radio communications and a Mode C transponder. But pilots request clearance through Class C (and Class D) airspace anyway. What would you have the controller do, tell the pilot "unable clearance through Class C airspace"? It's simpler just to "clear" the guy. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Not true. A "remain clear" prior to departure is no different than one in
the air. After departure, if the controller of the class C airspace makes radio contact, that is clearance to enter. -- ------------------------------- Travis "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... These are both right. Using the tail number is enough to establish radio contact and grants permission to enter the Class C. That is exactly why the extra "remain clear of the Class C" was included in the departure clearance. If the tail number were not enough, then that would not be necessary. After departure, the tail number and a radar contact are enough radio contact to enter the class C. If the controller needed something different, it would be added as a "Cessna 1234, radar contact, remain clear of the class C." The "remain clear of the Class C" applies only after departure and remains in effect until overridden by an instruction that permits or requires entry. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:g2TXb.40634$yE5.152096@attbi_s54... The pilot was told not to enter the Class C, so he went around it, with no further relevant communication with ATC. Right. The pilot left the frequency so did not hear several calls from the controller. The controller saw the target proceeding around the Class C airspace, concluded the pilot no longer wished to transit Class C airspace, so he discarded the strip. Then he came back the next day and again established two-way communication. Did the remain-clear instruction expire in the meantime? If so, when? The pilot changed his mind about Class C services. The controller discarded the strip. Nothing was carried forward to the next day. The next day's request had nothing to do with the previous day's. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... If, after having said "remain clear" the controller comes back with "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that is an implicit clearance to enter the class C. No, it is not. I don't know where you got that idea but it is simply not correct. There is nothing in "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that implies authorization to enter Class C airspace when previously told to remain clear. Controller's know the rules. If they don't want you in their airspace, they will ignore you or repeat the "remain clear" instruction. If the pilot acknowledged the first instruction to remain clear there's no need to repeat it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |