![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 5:31:04 PM UTC-5,
Unfortunately the laws of physics says this is highly inefficient. The efficiency is of minor importance when doing things like charge a cell phone with takes milliwatts, but becomes totally impractical at the megawatt level it would take to power even a small vehicle. -- Jim Pennino A circuit model is presented along with a derivation of key system concepts, such as frequency splitting, the maximum operating distance (critical coupling), and the behavior of the system as it becomes undercoupled. This theoretical model is validated against measured data and shows an excellent average coefficient of determination of 0.9875. An adaptive frequency tuning technique is demonstrated, which compensates for efficiency variations encountered when the transmitter-to-receiver distance and/or orientation are varied. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login...er% 3D5437250 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 5:31:04 PM UTC-5, wrote:
wrote: The concept wherein an "antennae" actually receives the directed energy while in flight, and recharges your battery bank. "It remains to be seen exactly what the specifications and consumer reception for Ossia and uBeam's technology will be. Nonetheless, the need for wireless power is real across a variety of applications. From simple consumer cell phones to electric vehicles, wireless power would fill a real need. If power could be transmitted long distances wirelessly, it would completely change "range anxiety" which has held back the EV market." http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-Ge...ss-Energy.html --- Unfortunately the laws of physics says this is highly inefficient. The efficiency is of minor importance when doing things like charge a cell phone with takes milliwatts, but becomes totally impractical at the megawatt level it would take to power even a small vehicle. -- Jim Pennino Yes, this technology is still in the research stage, and is not part of the actual blueprints which I hold of an atomic, cryogenic (artery system) electric, stealth plane. --- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 5:31:04 PM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: The concept wherein an "antennae" actually receives the directed energy while in flight, and recharges your battery bank. "It remains to be seen exactly what the specifications and consumer reception for Ossia and uBeam's technology will be. Nonetheless, the need for wireless power is real across a variety of applications. From simple consumer cell phones to electric vehicles, wireless power would fill a real need. If power could be transmitted long distances wirelessly, it would completely change "range anxiety" which has held back the EV market." http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-Ge...ss-Energy.html --- Unfortunately the laws of physics says this is highly inefficient. The efficiency is of minor importance when doing things like charge a cell phone with takes milliwatts, but becomes totally impractical at the megawatt level it would take to power even a small vehicle. In a weak coupling at resonance, magnetic resonance couplings can transfer energy with high efficiency. The specification results at high power are proposed. In this paper, the feasibility of wireless power transfer with large air gaps and high efficiency by small sized antennas that can be equipped on the bottom of EVs is proposed. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login...er% 3D5289747 Non sequitur. FYI there was a pilot project to test magnetic resonance couplings for vehicle power on roadways; too expensive to be practical. -- Jim Pennino |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 5:31:04 PM UTC-5, Unfortunately the laws of physics says this is highly inefficient. The efficiency is of minor importance when doing things like charge a cell phone with takes milliwatts, but becomes totally impractical at the megawatt level it would take to power even a small vehicle. -- Jim Pennino A circuit model is presented along with a derivation of key system concepts, such as frequency splitting, the maximum operating distance (critical coupling), and the behavior of the system as it becomes undercoupled. This theoretical model is validated against measured data and shows an excellent average coefficient of determination of 0.9875. An adaptive frequency tuning technique is demonstrated, which compensates for efficiency variations encountered when the transmitter-to-receiver distance and/or orientation are varied. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login...er% 3D5437250 Ignores the reality of flight. -- Jim Pennino |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 5:31:04 PM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: The concept wherein an "antennae" actually receives the directed energy while in flight, and recharges your battery bank. "It remains to be seen exactly what the specifications and consumer reception for Ossia and uBeam's technology will be. Nonetheless, the need for wireless power is real across a variety of applications. From simple consumer cell phones to electric vehicles, wireless power would fill a real need. If power could be transmitted long distances wirelessly, it would completely change "range anxiety" which has held back the EV market." http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-Ge...ss-Energy.html --- Unfortunately the laws of physics says this is highly inefficient. The efficiency is of minor importance when doing things like charge a cell phone with takes milliwatts, but becomes totally impractical at the megawatt level it would take to power even a small vehicle. -- Jim Pennino Yes, this technology is still in the research stage, and is not part of the actual blueprints which I hold of an atomic, cryogenic (artery system) electric, stealth plane. --- Which part of the laws of physics says this is highly inefficient did you not understand? -- Jim Pennino |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 7:54:52 AM UTC-5, Vaughn Simon wrote:
On 11/19/2015 7:24 PM, wrote: Ignores the reality of flight. ...and of physics I figured that out after posting once to this thread. Ha! Is that why you didn't reply once it was pointed out that you had mistakenly assumed that my system directly connected the principal drive to be powered by the auxiliary power unit? Or the mathematical calculations of amp/hour depletion rates vs. recharge rates to predict flight extension with quick-charge carbon batteries that can charge a car in 12 minutes, which you'd never heard of? And I'm sure you already knew all about a liquid nitrogen artery design that facilitates a cryogenic, zero resistance, super conductive design for aviation, but you chose not to comment about any of this because... I'm a "troll"? Good God. --- You are wasting time and keystrokes Jim. I decided to apply the old saying, "Don't feed the trolls." |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 9:46:04 PM UTC-5,
snip I hear you saying that you are skeptical of this technology, and it is noted. I don't have an opinion on it. It does seem however that directed energy over long distances may present a problem to unintended receivers. --- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for info on world record jet aircraft | Ted Parvo | Home Built | 25 | July 17th 12 01:23 PM |
Electric motor for hang glider | Legend Length | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 09 02:14 AM |
electric motor? | solarsell | Home Built | 13 | January 12th 07 01:03 AM |
Boeing's Electric Taxi Motor | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 43 | December 7th 05 06:41 AM |
Electric motor assisted super- or turbocharger? | Max Kallio | Rotorcraft | 13 | May 9th 05 09:09 PM |