If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 19:55:25 -0500, "James R. Freeman" wrote: 480 Lbs. is the design empty weight for the KR-2 but most come in about 540. Go to http://www.fly-kr.com the official web site of R&R or http://www.krnet.org the builders group. typical problems we are aware of in australia they come out over empty weight and quite often have an aft cg problem. the fuselage around the cockpit is structurally sound though. alan decked his at 80knots after the canopy opened in flight (side hinged) the aircraft was totalled but nothing penetrated the cockpit. he got out shaken but unhurt and has almost completed the rebuild. one other problem is the long AN3 bolts attaching the alloy casting gear legs to the torsion beam. these are not strong enough. with engineering assistance the local guy has used high strength NAS bolts of about AN4 diameter. in failure the nuts on the AN3's just pull straight off the bolts taking the threads with them. Forrest pay attention to empty weight. it is important. what you find in overweight aircraft is that the airspeed of lowest drag increases over what it could be. this means that on approach to landing you have to keep the speed up or the induced drag rises quickly and as it does the sink rate increases. a heavily loaded Wittman Tailwind for example will approach at 70 knots quite happily but will develop quite alarming sink rates below 60 knots unless you have power on. it stalls at 47 knots in landing configuration. in a gusting 20 knot crosswind it becomes a really attention grabbing exercise to approach at 70 knots round out and wash off the excess airspeed down to landing speed, while juggling the drift, without whanging it on so hard that you bend something ...or end up in yet another go around. overweight takes all the fun out of flying I can tell you. you can only correct the problem by not building it in. Stealth Pilot Australia Hello Stealth Pilot, I think it's pretty cool to be hearing from Australia. I was in port at Gerldton (sp.?) W. Australia for a week when I was in the Navy. Some nice folks took me in for a couple of days and we took in some local sights (~200k radius) cruising about in their ute. One day I hope to visit there again. I was told that my KR-2 has had the wings and tail extended. However, I have not confirmed that yet. The logs are a lot sketchy and much of the paperwork seems to be missing. The previous owner is reportedly dead. Reportedly death not attributable to flight related incident. Your post attached here is very informative. Big John warned I might be in a little deep with this machine as a low time pilot. Maybe being a low time -student- pilot will help matters a bit? :-0 The complications are no big bother to me though. I like to have creative endeavors to occupy my mind with. And my flight instructor was good enough to have mixed my breakfast up a bit a couple of times to fasten the concept that getting airborne was not to be taken lightly. Anyway, I'll post some dimensions sometime in the next couple of days and keep plugging away at this project. I'm currently in what I like to think of as the cost of my education. It has become apparent to me that a new project will be in order once this one is finished. I'm getting the idea that some of the bells and whistles might have to wait until then. Maybe. By the way, I'm not terribly happy with the way the landing gear was bolted, though it must have been safe enough to put a bunch of hours on the plane. And the canopy attachment (forward hinged) was becoming frayed. I'm trying to figure out how to get it to slide forward instead. But ... well, we'll see. Thanks, Forrest |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|