If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
USA and FAI rules
On Jan 15, 8:45*pm, rlovinggood wrote:
Mr. Ray Galloway (P1) asked for me to post the following note: There has been much discussion over the differences between the FAI rules and the US rules. This is partly due to the fact that the US is the only country that does not follow FAI rules. This is simply not true. The vast majority of countries, in fact, use their own rules. Look em' up; it's not hard, just look up the national soaring association (equivalent of ssa.org) and then find their contest rules. Canada, UK, Australia are all in English so you can see them. You will find nice long rules just like ours. You will not find "for competition rules see IGC annex A" period, full stop. It is true that many countries bend their rules towards the IGC standard, for example in scoring formulas, turnpoint definitions, start and finish definitions, etc. It is also true that almost all countries modify these and other rules and procedures, as well as filling in the vast blank space in FAI rules covered under "local procedures." Contrariwise, it is also true that many features of US rules are similar to FAI rules. We do, after all, fly assigned and area tasks, defined in pretty much the same way. But it is simply not true that they 'follow FAI rules" and we do not. At the 1985 WGC the US team was among the top contenders. In 2010 WGC, the last year that figures are available, we were 23 out of 24. In 25 years we have gone from near the top to next to last. There is one indisputable fact---they are wining and we are losing. Maybe we should consider joining the rest of the world. The Rules Committee faces a really tough problem. Shall we design contests whose number one goal is to train pilots to do well at world gliding championships -- even if that means that we see fewer pilots participating, fewer contests being run, smaller turnouts at the contests we do run, organizers losing money? Or should we design contests whose number one goals are safety, fun, and widespread participation; getting people involved in contest soaring? Put aside the question of which set of rules will attract more people -- the camp that says "use FAI rules and more will come" has an argument, but needs to prove its case by running regionals under FAI rules and seeing if US pilots do indeed prefer that format. And we can end up either way on that question. But answer for us Ray and Ray's deeper question: which should be the GOAL: producing a better world team, or participation: Should we turn all our contests into "team training camps" to prepare people for the.hard decisions they will face in contests like Argentina? To wit, -gaggle and start tactics, -team/pair flying, -extensive ground support, -deep knowledge of world rules quirks, like when you should intentionally land out 100 meter short of the finish line or when you should abandon the chance of getting home and just go for distance in the cylinders, -day after day of landing out on long assigned tasks, meaning full time crew is mandatory, -or (as in Uvlade) dealing with tasks that force you to fly into thunderstorms, -eventually (as in europe) buying and learning the art of motor management -tactics for unlimited altitude starts (thermal wave at Uvalde, gaggling in clouds elsewhere); tactics for limited altitude no time limit starts (VNE dives) -final glides to a line 3 km short of the airport; landing in fields 0-3 km of the airport etc. etc. This is not a rant. These are just some of the features of contests run under FAI rules that require long study and practice to master. And US pilots are not that great at many of these aspects, and moving all our contests to mirror WGC conditions would undoubtedly produce a small number of pilots who were much better at flying in WGC contests. So far, the RC has felt that running contests these ways would attract fewer people, be less fun, moderately less safe, and much less well attended. Again, we can and will have that argument later. For now, which should be our number one goal? A great team, even if that means smaller and more expensive contests? Or participation, fun, and development, even if that means a somewhat less successful world team? This is not an easy question I hope we can split the difference a bit with more team training camps (open to all pilots) run under FAI rules, and I would love for one of the FAI rules fanatics to put in the effort to run a continental championship under FAI rules. I would love for one of them to run regionals under FAI rules to put the "build it and they will come" theory to the test. John Cochrane Thanks for any help. You're welcome! Now, help us with this tough issue. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 06 01:36 AM |
SSA Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 2 | October 6th 06 03:27 PM |
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | September 27th 05 10:52 PM |
FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 1 | February 3rd 04 02:36 AM |
New SRA Site - New 2003 Rules Minutes and 2004 Rules Summary | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 03:38 AM |