The Aviator

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:13:10 -0800, Mutts wrote in
::

$$$ of course. Happy hero pilot sells better then the truth.

You must have missed this:

"No.. its not BuZZard.. its a bot. It cracks me up seeing people
actually reply to the bot.. ROFLMAO!" -- BuZZard




Dang.
Do/will bots respond to bots too? Maybe we are all wasting our time here, er,
wasting MORE time here. Let the bots talk to each other.

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:1vECd.22965$wu4.16407@attbi_s52...
If death resulting from the risks of a lifestyle is defined as self-inflicted,
then anyone who dies in a plane crash committed suicide.

I have relatives who wouldn't argue against that.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"



Or even in a car crash then...


;-)



--
Dan D.
http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html


..

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:33:18 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:

Someday you should learn to speak English. It's a really neat language.

I'd forgotten that I had you in a kill file. I created a new iteration
of Agent, and my kill files fell out.

Plonk!

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 03:28:25 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:

Dying from the effects of a disease is hardly self-inflicted.

AIDS is often a lifestyle disease, like lung cancer or cihorris of the
liver, hence self-inflicted.

But when you dismissed the possibility that his death was "self-inflicted",
as you put it (and you subsequently affirmed that you were referring there
to AIDS), you then proposed *instead* of "self-infliction" that "his diet...
and his drug habit" are among the more plausible explanations (as indeed
they are). By what conceivable rationale would an AIDS death be more
"self-inflicted" than a diet- or drug-induced death (*especially* at a time
when the danger of AIDS was *not even known*)?

When pressed, you retreated to a standard of "self-infliction" by which the
vast majority of Americans' deaths would qualify. Clearly, though, you
ordinarily use the term far more selectively, as your original statement
demonstrates.

--Gary

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:34:31 -0500, "Gary Drescher"
wrote:

When pressed, you retreated to a standard of "self-infliction" by which the
vast majority of Americans' deaths would qualify. Clearly, though, you
ordinarily use the term far more selectively, as your original statement
demonstrates.

I don't know what the f*** you're talking about, and I am losing
interest in the discussion.

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:07:53 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote in
::

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:34:31 -0500, "Gary Drescher"
wrote:

When pressed, you retreated to a standard of "self-infliction" by which the
vast majority of Americans' deaths would qualify. Clearly, though, you
ordinarily use the term far more selectively, as your original statement
demonstrates.

I don't know what the f*** you're talking about, and I am losing
interest in the discussion.

Jose,

Would this qualify as an example of Larry's Corollary?