A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Does FLARM meet TABS requirement?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 9th 15, 08:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default Does FLARM meet TABS requirement?

On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 11:44:09 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Darryl, I don't know how you can manage to keep on top of all this ADS-B stuff without your head exploding but thank you for doing so! Whenever I try to make sense of it all it makes me want to give up flying and take up Tiddlywinks or something.

Out of curiosity, what performance parameters in the PowerFLARM system make it a "degraded" GPS source unsuitable for ADS-B out? I assume the system must be accurate enough for airborne traffic awareness and collision warnings as it has proven satisfactory in FLARM to FLARM situations.


Everybody keeps thinking first about GPS accuracy, accuracy is just a small part of what makes a high-end aviation GPS like a TSO-C145c device. It's reliability, failure detection and predictability of that reliability that separate these from consumer devices.

A TSO'ed/IFR GPS source used to meet the FAA 2020 Mandate such as TSO-C145c has to support RAIM for reliability purposes. PowerFLARM's consumer chipset based GPS source cannot do that.... and RAIM and other goodies are not transmitted over NMEA. TABS/TSO-C199 Class B GPS sources do away with the RAIM requirement (it's actually one of the big good things in that TSO).


TABS/TSO-C199 Class A (the transponder/1090ES Out part) use HFOM (Horizontal Figure of Merit) and VFOM (Vertical Figure of Merit) for "GPS health", but NMEA does not send HFOM or VFOM data. That is why the TSO allows the Class A TABS device to calculate HFOM and VFOM from HDOP and VDOP which NMEA does provide (in $GPGSA). Or course a TSO-C199 Class B device might use NMEA, Aviation serial, NexNav serial binary, etc.

It's worth noting that the first GPS product announced that is targeted at TABS Class B GPS source use is the NexNav Micro-i, and few details are available so far, but I expect it will transmit GPS data on both NexNav serial binary and NMEA serial links as their similar products do, and it does include RAIM support (which would require use of the NexNav binary serial link.... which the Trig TT-21/22 already support) even though that is not required for TABS... NexNav have likely largely just repackaged another of their products at reduced price.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flarm IGC files on non-IGC certified Flarm? Movses Soaring 21 March 16th 15 09:59 PM
Guitar Chords/Tabs for "Ridge Runner" [email protected] Soaring 3 November 20th 08 05:00 AM
IFR Alternate Requirement gwengler Instrument Flight Rules 18 May 18th 05 02:26 PM
Mode S to become requirement? Bob Chilcoat Owning 6 July 14th 04 11:25 PM
New Castle ELT Requirement Ed Byars Soaring 16 June 19th 04 06:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.