A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Woodstock Glider



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old April 8th 08, 02:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Woodstock Glider

On Apr 7, 8:51 pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Apr 7, 4:44 pm, wrote:

Sorry, I just clued in on the aerodynamic twist.
The tip foil should stall later, right.
I got confused with the %18 vs %13, which is just the thickness and
I wouldn't have thought the difference would have been significant,
but if what Mr. Sinclair is saying, they are actually different foils then
there would be some form of washout. Thanks guys.


Yup, that's the way I understand it - there's no angular difference
between the chord lines of the root and tip sections, but the profile
differences between the root and tip airfoils make the wing act as if
there are.

Here's a couple of pictures from the Les Sparks site that shows the
Woodstock wing profiles:

http://members.aol.com/lessparks/clint20.jpg

http://members.aol.com/woodglider/clint25t.jpg

It's kind of hard to see in the photos, but if you look closely you
can see that the profile goes from sort of flat-bottomed at the tip to
a deeper-bellied (for lack of a better term) section at the root.

Here's the home page for the site those photos are from:

http://members.aol.com/woodglider/index.htm

I haven't heard from Les for a while, I wonder what's up with his
project.

I scanned sheet one of the 13M drawings and have the foils



That sounds like a good plan, that ought to work great. The main
gotcha, and you've probably already thought of this, is that old
blueprints tend to shrink and warp a bit as they age. Also, sometimes
scanners add their own scaling errors. So its possible to accumulate a
bunch of little errors that add up to something substantial. The plans
probably have some key dimensions that you can use to correct the
scaling of your DWGs; if you keep an eye on them you'll be fine.


Yes, Hence me looking for data points. The chord at root and tip are
known and have hard dimensions for.
I can check that with % chord at root and tip for scaling in that
direction, print off and check over the actual prints I have.
I can also CNC Route some "test ribs" using my CNC router.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Woodstock project FOR SALE MartyH Soaring 0 August 15th 07 08:30 PM
Woodstock spars MartyH Soaring 11 June 22nd 07 03:13 AM
Woodstock Plans [email protected] Soaring 4 August 10th 06 11:11 PM
Query on the Woodstock Stealth Pilot Soaring 3 July 25th 06 08:02 PM
Woodstock Plans F/S [email protected] Soaring 0 May 16th 05 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.