If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Jay Honeck writes:
Our guest found an instructor and aircraft at a smaller, nearby airport, so the story doesn't end entirely sadly. But it's just SO frustrating to see the skies over Iowa City slowly becoming empty thanks to people in the industry who simply don't understand that without an active, proactive interest in flight training EVERYTHING stops in about ten years. For GA pilots flying for pleasure, maybe. But a lot of people care only about aviation as transportation, and that will still be alive and well in ten years, I suspect. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Jay Honeck writes: Our guest found an instructor and aircraft at a smaller, nearby airport, so the story doesn't end entirely sadly. But it's just SO frustrating to see the skies over Iowa City slowly becoming empty thanks to people in the industry who simply don't understand that without an active, proactive interest in flight training EVERYTHING stops in about ten years. For GA pilots flying for pleasure, maybe. But a lot of people care only about aviation as transportation, and that will still be alive and well in ten years, I suspect. Who cares what you think? You don't fly Bertie |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Jay Honeck writes: He went on to state that Piper would no longer be able to provide parts support for "ancient" aircraft, and tossed out a "maximum" age of 25 years. Of course, the room was packed with people flying planes that were, on average, 30 years old -- so the room became silent at this quasi-announcement. (No one is quite sure if he was really "announcing" this change, or if he was just floating the idea...) Quite surprising, given that the average age of small GA aircraft is above 30 these days (around 35, I think). Soi what? You don't fly anyway |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Neil Gould writes:
I hope the infusion of cash from Honda to build the PiperJet isn't being called "profit". That would spell the end of the company in a very short time. In today's world of anonymous and institutional shareholders, a very short time is the only kind of time--nobody plans for the long term. The objective is to make maximum profits in minimum time. If a company ceases to do that, it is carved into pieces and sold. Nobody cares about what the company produces or how long it lives; it's just an interchangeable profit machine that is dismantled and discarded once it ceases to produce profits quickly enough. That's the way all large public corporations are being managed these days, and the results for society are always the same. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
EridanMan writes:
But in the end all I can say is screw it. Screw my generation, screw the affluence-chasing new CEO piper... In the end all that matters is that I can go watch the sun set from 2000 feet over the Pacific Ocean on a whim... In part, you illustrate the problem: Aviation is attainable for you because you are so passionate about it that you are willing to sacrifice many other things to have it. But most people aren't that way, and aviation is so cripplingly expensive that anyone who doesn't have a very single-minded interest in it--or a fat bank account--cannot see it as a practical option. That's the real problem for GA, not any fear of flying. However, I do agree that the fearfulness of society as a whole today is remarkable and worrisome, the result of decades of high-tech media propaganda cashing in on paranoia and FUD. Unfortunately, fearful people are very easily manipulated and controlled, and tend to make only irrational decisions when allowed to act on their own. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Neil Gould writes: I hope the infusion of cash from Honda to build the PiperJet isn't being called "profit". That would spell the end of the company in a very short time. In today's world of anonymous and institutional shareholders, a very short time is the only kind of time--nobody plans for the long term. The objective is to make maximum profits in minimum time. Never a prob for you, eh bankrupt boi? Bertie |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Mxsmanic wrote in
: EridanMan writes: But in the end all I can say is screw it. Screw my generation, screw the affluence-chasing new CEO piper... In the end all that matters is that I can go watch the sun set from 2000 feet over the Pacific Ocean on a whim... In part, you illustrate the problem: Aviation is attainable for you because you are so passionate about it that you are willing to sacrifice many other things to have it. Also helps if you're not bankrupt#### Bertie |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
On 2007-06-18, Jay Honeck wrote:
I agree, although the cost of LSAs is certainly no bargan. You can buy a VERY nice Cherokee 140 for half of what the cheapest LSA is going for nowadays. Looking at the LSA earlier in the thread - if I had the choice of going in and buying one of those with three other people, versus outright owning a Cherokee 140, I'd buy the LSA in a heartbeat. The LSA mentioned earlier in the thread looks so damned sexy, and burns about 1/3rd of the fuel of a Cherokee 140 and probably goes as fast. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
On 2007-06-18, Mike Adams wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote: Then things went downhill. Not to start a Cessna vs. Piper debate(!) I've always heard this about Piper - giving pilots interested in the company the cold shoulder, but if you go to the Cessna factory they'll give you a tour. Indeed, we did just that - we happened to be passing the area in a pair of (ancient) Cessnas (a 1951 C170, and a 1946 C140), and we turned up un-announced - they were very pleased to see us at the factory and gave us a tour. After all, we could one day be future customers. So out of Piper and Cessna, who's selling all the light GA stuff? Not hard to guess. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Gloom
Jay Honeck wrote:
Our guest found an instructor and aircraft at a smaller, nearby airport, so the story doesn't end entirely sadly. But it's just SO frustrating to see the skies over Iowa City slowly becoming empty thanks to people in the industry who simply don't understand that without an active, proactive interest in flight training EVERYTHING stops in about ten years. Becoming empty? I thought all this GA activity was causing ATC to work overtime... and flight delays of commercial jets??? Oh my ... could the FAA be full of sh!# like other government agencies? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|