If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
Bret Ludwig wrote:
Introduction - Powerplant Choices RV aircraft are designed to use Lycoming aircraft engines. Did you have a point here? Matt |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
"Kingfish" wrote in message ups.com... Casey Wilson wrote: Any chance there's a point to this drivel? I found myself thinking the same thing Herr Ludwig didn't make it clear that he is ranting AGAINST the choice of the Lycoming for all RVs. How hard would it be to mount a Continental to an RV? I'm no A&P but how different could the mounts be for two engines of similar architecture? Do Cont. engines use four-point mounts like Lycs? Very different mounts. In addition, the 0-300 Continental is typically a 145 hp engine. Sure, it'll fly any of the 2 seat RV's, but *nobody* wants less power than the other guy, who is probably flying behind a 160 or 180 hp engine. In talking with Van's, they really thought they would have quite a few customers for the RV-9 who would use the 0-235 or 0-290. Sure, there are a few, but there are far more guys bolting on the 0-360 @ 180 hp, which is 20 hp more than what Van had in mind when he designed the airplane. KB |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
Casey Wilson wrote: "Newps" wrote in message . .. Any chance there's a point to this drivel? Herr Ludwig didn't make it clear that he is ranting AGAINST the choice of the Lycoming for all RVs. Akshully, Herr Ludwig makes no cogent remarks as he stepped on his..., well let it go at that. So you could have answered my question with one word then. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
Kyle Boatright wrote: In talking with Van's, they really thought they would have quite a few customers for the RV-9 who would use the 0-235 or 0-290. Sure, there are a few, but there are far more guys bolting on the 0-360 @ 180 hp, which is 20 hp more than what Van had in mind when he designed the airplane. And now there's an O-340 out there that puts out 190 hp. Oh the choices. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
Kyle Boatright wrote:
In talking with Van's, they really thought they would have quite a few customers for the RV-9 who would use the 0-235 or 0-290. Sure, there are a few, but there are far more guys bolting on the 0-360 @ 180 hp, which is 20 hp more than what Van had in mind when he designed the airplane. That sounds a bit like the story of the RV-6. I thought it was originally intended for the O-320, and as more and more builders were apparently successful with O-360 installations, Van designed the RV-7 with that (among other changes) in mind. There is an old Tony Bingelis article about the pros and cons (mostly cons... weight, fuel flow) of bigger engines. Apparently a lot of RV builders missed that memo... Or you could say it is a credit on the basic design that it accepts increased power so well. I think RVs are great airplanes although I don't want one for my own. Apples and oranges thing I guess. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
"Kyle Boatright" wrote In talking with Van's, they really thought they would have quite a few customers for the RV-9 who would use the 0-235 or 0-290. Sure, there are a few, but there are far more guys bolting on the 0-360 @ 180 hp, which is 20 hp more than what Van had in mind when he designed the airplane. I have a friend who was one of the few that chose the lower HP, then. He built a fire breathing, race 4.3 liter Chevy RV-7, then got it done and started almost immediately on a RV-9, which he put a 235 in. He claims that he can go blasting around in the 235 HP Chevy when he wants to go fast, and poke along in the O-235ci for trips, for next to nothing in gas costs. The best of both worlds! -- Jim in NC |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
"Newps" wrote in message . .. Kyle Boatright wrote: In talking with Van's, they really thought they would have quite a few customers for the RV-9 who would use the 0-235 or 0-290. Sure, there are a few, but there are far more guys bolting on the 0-360 @ 180 hp, which is 20 hp more than what Van had in mind when he designed the airplane. And now there's an O-340 out there that puts out 190 hp. Oh the choices. You're right, there are lots of choices. The O-340 as you mentioned, but also the O-390 and O-400, which are enlarged O-360's. Presumably all three of these engines will be relatively low volume. I'd be scared to death to buy one because if the Lyclone manufacturer who produces the oddball engine goes out of business, I don't think there will enough units in the field to drive anyone to support the engines. People with GO-300's, GO-470's, C-85's, O-290's and several other legacy powerplants are having problems getting parts for their engines. Those engines had much longer production runs than today's oddball lyclones are likely to see. KB |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Ludwig's Blather here.
"Steve Foley" wrote in message news:F4KEg.3078$df.1829@trndny06... Are the comments in parentheses yours? It's kind of hard to tell who wrote what. In any case, I know of at one Lycoming engine designed for a boat. I think it was used in the 1930s. Lycomings are used in airboats all the time in Florida. And Van's aircraft built one of their RV-10s with a Continental. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
Jim Carriere wrote:
That sounds a bit like the story of the RV-6. I thought it was originally intended for the O-320, and as more and more builders were apparently successful with O-360 installations, Van designed the RV-7 with that (among other changes) in mind. I built, own and still fly after 18 years the second customer built RV-6 and it has always been designed for an O-320 Or a O-360. Jerry |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Look at Van's Blather here.
Jerry Springer wrote:
Jim Carriere wrote: That sounds a bit like the story of the RV-6. I thought it was originally intended for the O-320, and as more and more builders were apparently successful with O-360 installations, Van designed the RV-7 with that (among other changes) in mind. I built, own and still fly after 18 years the second customer built RV-6 and it has always been designed for an O-320 Or a O-360. Hmmm, OK, was the -6 designed for the O-360 (to improve on the -4)? Or am I misinformed? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zodiac XL vs Rans S-19 vs Van's RV-12 | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 12 | July 2nd 06 10:31 PM |
Very Nice Van's RV-6A For Sale | Don | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | January 14th 06 12:13 AM |
Very Nice Van's RV-6A For Sale | Don | General Aviation | 1 | December 21st 05 01:52 AM |
Vans RV-11 | Scott Correa | Soaring | 27 | January 5th 04 07:56 AM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |