A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lockheed's JSF Costs to Rise $45 Billion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 6th 04, 02:53 AM
Henry J Cobb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lockheed's JSF Costs to Rise $45 Billion

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=4756042
In a report to Congress, the Pentagon said JSF costs were rising due
to increasing contractor labor and overhead costs and a delay in the
start of procurement from 2006 to 2007, as well as the addition of a
new optical tracking system.


This isn't the first time Lockmart has had runaway costs.

http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2790447
So Pedeleose took his concerns to the Defense Criminal Investigative
Service, which concluded, in a November 2001 report, that Lockheed’s
prices were “based on cost and pricing data that was known to be false
and purposely overstated.”


-HJC
How do you get runaway labor costs when unemployment is so high?

  #2  
Old April 6th 04, 11:34 AM
John Cook
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:53:23 -0700, Henry J Cobb wrote:

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=4756042
In a report to Congress, the Pentagon said JSF costs were rising due
to increasing contractor labor and overhead costs and a delay in the
start of procurement from 2006 to 2007, as well as the addition of a
new optical tracking system.


This isn't the first time Lockmart has had runaway costs.

http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2790447
So Pedeleose took his concerns to the Defense Criminal Investigative
Service, which concluded, in a November 2001 report, that Lockheed’s
prices were “based on cost and pricing data that was known to be false
and purposely overstated.”


-HJC
How do you get runaway labor costs when unemployment is so high?



Interesting the Dollar is weaker against other currencies, so the non
US suppliers are being priced out of the contracts, this may have
something to do with it, no cheap labour.

But if too much non US content is lost will those non US companies
jump ship.

It will need a fantastic balancing act to get this right..

Cheers
John Cook

Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All
opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them.

Email Address :-
Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me
Eurofighter Website :-
http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk
  #3  
Old April 6th 04, 02:03 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Cook" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:53:23 -0700, Henry J Cobb wrote:

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=4756042
In a report to Congress, the Pentagon said JSF costs were rising due
to increasing contractor labor and overhead costs and a delay in the
start of procurement from 2006 to 2007, as well as the addition of a
new optical tracking system.


This isn't the first time Lockmart has had runaway costs.

http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2790447
So Pedeleose took his concerns to the Defense Criminal Investigative
Service, which concluded, in a November 2001 report, that Lockheed's
prices were "based on cost and pricing data that was known to be false
and purposely overstated."


-HJC
How do you get runaway labor costs when unemployment is so high?



Interesting the Dollar is weaker against other currencies, so the non
US suppliers are being priced out of the contracts, this may have
something to do with it, no cheap labour.


Odd, since as of last November nine contracts, with seven different firms,
had already been signed with Australian companies *alone* in regards to JSF
work. Estimate of the return to Australia over the projected life of the
program (NOT including the value of those nine contracts, or follow-ons, or
subsequent additional contracts) if the RAAF selects the F-35 is estimated
to be some $600 million (Australian) (in terms of royalties, waived export
fees, etc.) ( www.defence.gov.au/jsf/capability.asp ), for an investment of
some $200 million (Aus) over a ten year period as a Level 3 SDD partner.
LMCO has even gone so far as to promise to let "no bid" contracts to firms
from participating JSF nations in order to ensure an equitable distribution
of work-share across the consortium (www.ainonline.com/Publications/
asian/asian_04/d1_jsfp22.html ).

Brooks


But if too much non US content is lost will those non US companies
jump ship.

It will need a fantastic balancing act to get this right..

Cheers
John Cook

Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All
opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them.

Email Address :-
Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me
Eurofighter Website :-
http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk



  #4  
Old April 6th 04, 09:33 PM
Harry Andreas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Henry J Cobb wrote:

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=4756042
In a report to Congress, the Pentagon said JSF costs were rising due
to increasing contractor labor and overhead costs and a delay in the
start of procurement from 2006 to 2007, as well as the addition of a
new optical tracking system.


This isn't the first time Lockmart has had runaway costs.

http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2790447
So Pedeleose took his concerns to the Defense Criminal Investigative
Service, which concluded, in a November 2001 report, that Lockheed’s
prices were “based on cost and pricing data that was known to be false
and purposely overstated.”


-HJC
How do you get runaway labor costs when unemployment is so high?


Unemployment is not high in the aerospace engineering business.
We've hired hundreds of new engineers in the last 2 years.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Eurofighter Costs John Cook Military Aviation 0 July 9th 03 11:58 AM
Marines fight for $48 billion high-tech air fleet Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 7th 03 11:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.