Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion

"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:n4Gqk.33792
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

In real life it's more like someone being called a bigmouth asshole, him
getting ****ed off and throwing his toys out of sandbax and running away
like a little girl.



Bertie

Ya, like you would have a clue about real life.


Like you would have a clue about any life.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:n4Gqk.33792
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

In real life it's more like someone being called a bigmouth asshole, him
getting ****ed off and throwing his toys out of sandbax and running away
like a little girl.



Bertie

Ya, like you would have a clue about real life.


Like you would have a clue about any life.


Bertie

Your actions here speak volumes.

"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
"The Bunyip Slayer" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:n4Gqk.33792
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

In real life it's more like someone being called a bigmouth
asshole, him getting ****ed off and throwing his toys out of
sandbax and running away like a little girl.



Bertie

Ya, like you would have a clue about real life.


Like you would have a clue about any life.


Bertie

Your actions here speak volumes.


Yes, I know.



Bertie

"KKK wannabe" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
"KKK wannabe" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
"tater" wrote in message
m...

"buttman" wrote in message
...
snip
The sites he posted are moderated and the slime balls that post the
crap
here would be booted out of those sites.

Perhaps, but so would slime balls that advertised other forums on those
"sites" ad nauseum.


Moderated??

Or thought control from Marxist anti-liberty slime balls?

FREEDOM
LIBERTY
The TRUTH will NEVER be stopped
NEVER

Ah, come now, Grand Wizard. None of the BS you spew has anything to do
with any of the above.

Grand Wizard??
OK

Poooof!!!
You are a "San Francisco Rump Ranger"

Weeeeeeeeeeeeee I'M voting for Obama girlfriend

You should let everyone know when you're trying to be funny, GW. Those not
as quick as I am might mistake your ramblings as drug induced (and they
might be right). Then again you're not talking to yourself in the 3rd
person today, so perhaps you're on legitimate meds, no? But I suppose one
can't expect much from a 3rd class moron who thinks exercising
"freedom-of-speech" means he should spam newsgroups with his mouthbreathing
idiocies.

Jim Logajan writes:

The right to "freedom of speech" does not apply to the use of the resources
of private entities that belong to others.

I didn't say anything about rights.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Jim Logajan writes:

The right to "freedom of speech" does not apply to the use of the
resources of private entities that belong to others.

I didn't say anything about rights.


What would rights matter to you?

You don't do anything.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .

sigh Another one for the kill file.

Won't do you much goood. He's nym shifting for three reasons. Primarily,
in
an attempt to avoid being sanctioned by his server for spewing like he did
before. Secondly to avoid being hammered by the AUK guys and garnering
another prestiguous AUK award, and last, but not least, to avoid
killfiles.


Bertie

Classic example of a clueless know-it-all. You really are gone on the kook
**** aren't you. What a lamer.

Nope, just did it because you keep forging my name. Better luck next time.

Dudley Henriques writes:

The web based forums I frequent are moderated ONLY for abusive and/or
off topic posting. As long as your post is non-abusive and on topic, you
are in effect unmoderated.

I've worked as a moderator in the past. It is virtually impossible to
objectively determine whether or not a post is abusive, off-topic, etc., and
inevitably prejudices work their way into the decisions. Most moderators lack
the experience or will to do things right and are dramatically subjective in
their decisions.

One can always spout off the mantra about free speech.

The founders of the United States spouted off about it all the time.

If the freedom to be subjected to abusive posting and off topic posting
is your thing, then by all means, there's Usenet.

It doesn't bother me, and it's a tiny price to pay for an important liberty.

To these people I say this; even in a country that guarantees free
speech, you can not cry "FIRE" in a crowded theater.

Actually you can. There is no prior restraint, and there is no censorship.

John Godwin writes:

You are a perfect example of a failed educational system. Freedom of
speech (as in the Constitution) applies only to what the government
can't do.

Freedom of speech is a general principle that has no specific connection to
government.

writes:

Then you should learn what it really means.

Freedom of speech means the government can't silence you. It does not
mean everyone has to listen to you.

Freedom of speech means that you can say what you want, without prior
restraint or censorship.