A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C-130 on Navy Carrier



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 05, 04:16 PM
Gord Beaman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rob van Riel wrote:

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:38:38 +0000, Peter Twydell wrote:

In message , Rob van Riel
writes
smaal problem. I've gotten it into my head to build scale models of every
type of post WWII plane that flew of the decks of US carriers, and now it


Everything? Including FAA, Aéronavale, Koninklijke Marine, RAN, etc.?
Sounds like quite a list if that's the case!


Basically, just US Navy/Marines, but if there was an interesting enough
guest appearance on one of the US carriers, I'll consider it qualified.
And yes, you're right, even that is quite a list, but it's still a lot
less than it would be if I declared a modelling free for all. Many
modellers have hundreds, if not thousands of unbuilt kits in the attic, so
limited myself to this and a few other subjects. It may not sound like
such a great limitation, but it sure beats "anything that ever flew or is
otherwise interesting".

Rob


Don't forget the B-25 Mitchell of course...
--

-Gord.
(use gordon in email)
  #2  
Old February 16th 05, 10:26 PM
Rob van Riel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:16:11 +0000, Gord Beaman wrote:
Don't forget the B-25 Mitchell of course...


Sorry, got to draw the line somewhere. Unless Mitchells flew of one of the
carriers after WWII as well...

Rob

  #4  
Old February 19th 05, 10:38 PM
John Randolph
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sadly, Cdr. Walter "Smokey" Stovall, Jim Flatley's co-pilot, passed away
from leukemia in Bethesda Naval Hospital in 1972.

An even stranger event was the landing aboard and immediate deck launch from
USS Ranger of a U-2 in the mid 1960's. Anyone have the details on that? It
was a secret operation and the majority of the crew were not allowed above
flight deck level during the op.

"W. D. Allen Sr." wrote in message
...
Does anyone know anything about the C-130 that made arrested landings and
launches from a Navy aircraft carrier back in the 1960s?

WDA

end





  #5  
Old February 20th 05, 04:42 AM
wws
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Randolph wrote:

Sadly, Cdr. Walter "Smokey" Stovall, Jim Flatley's co-pilot, passed away
from leukemia in Bethesda Naval Hospital in 1972.

An even stranger event was the landing aboard and immediate deck launch from
USS Ranger of a U-2 in the mid 1960's. Anyone have the details on that? It
was a secret operation and the majority of the crew were not allowed above
flight deck level during the op.

"W. D. Allen Sr." wrote in message
...

Does anyone know anything about the C-130 that made arrested landings and
launches from a Navy aircraft carrier back in the 1960s?

WDA

end





Japan to Join U.S. Policy on Taiwan

Growth of China Seen Behind Shift

By Anthony Faiola
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, February 18, 2005; Page A01
The Chinese seem to feel they are in control in the North Korea nuclear
situation. The following is from the 'other' Washington paper, the one
without ties to South Korea.


TOKYO, Feb. 17 -- The United States and Japan will declare Saturday for
the first time in a joint agreement that Taiwan is a mutual security
concern, according to a draft of the document. Analysts called the move
a demonstration of Japan's willingness to confront the rapidly growing
might of China.

The United States has long focused attention on the Chinese
government's threat to use military force against Taiwan if the island,
which China views as a renegade province, moves toward independence.
Until now, Japan has been content to let the United States bear the
brunt of Beijing's displeasure.

But in the most significant alteration since 1996 to the U.S.-Japan
Security Alliance, which remains the cornerstone of U.S. interests in
East Asia, Japan will join the Bush administration in identifying
security in the Taiwan Strait as a "common strategic objective." Set
for release after a meeting of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and their Japanese counterparts in
Washington on Saturday, the revisions will also call for Japan to take
a greater role in conjunction with U.S. forces both in Asia and beyond,
according to a draft copy obtained by The Washington Post.

Although it is likely to anger China, the move is being welcomed by
Taiwan, which, despite having been occupied by Japan from 1895 to 1945,
maintains an empathy for the Japanese that is rare in Asia. Elderly
Taiwanese, for instance, still show delight in Japanese language and
culture. Last month, Taiwan inaugurated its $3 billion, Japanese-built
bullet train, which can reach speeds of almost 200 miles per hour. And
in December, Japan angered China by granting a tourist visa to former
Taiwanese president Lee Teng-hui, who was educated in Japan and had an
emotional reunion here with a former professor.

"This is the first time that Japan has made its stance clear; in the
past, Japan has been very indirect on the Taiwan issue," said Koh
Se-kai, Taiwan's special representative to Japan, which since 1972 has
had formal relations with China but not with Taiwan. "We're relieved
that Japan has become more assertive."

Japan's constitution, drafted by the United States at the end of World
War II, prohibits the country from going to war. But there is strong
pressure to revise the constitution so that Japan's Self-Defense Forces
can act as a real military.

Along with the threat of North Korea, which declared itself a
nuclear-armed nation last week, the rise of China has become the
primary concern fueling Japan's shift away from nearly six decades of
pacifism.

Japan has generally been inclined to sidestep conflict with China. But
in recent years, China has dramatically modernized its military while
expanding its sphere of influence in Asia on the strength of its
booming economy. The effort to extend its reach has included exploring
for natural gas near Japanese-claimed waters only 110 miles north of
Taiwan and countering Japan's claims to exclusive economic zones in the
Pacific.

In response, Japan has also shifted course in the past year, moving to
defend its territorial claims in the East China Sea. Last November,
Japan dispatched aircraft on a two-day hunt for a Han-class Chinese
submarine that briefly intruded into Japan's far southern waters in
what many here saw as a test of Japanese resolve in the event of
Chinese aggression against Taiwan.

"It would be wrong for us to send a signal to China that the United
States and Japan will watch and tolerate China's military invasion of
Taiwan," said Shinzo Abe, the acting secretary general of Japan's
ruling Liberal Democratic Party who is widely considered a likely
successor to Junichiro Koizumi as prime minister. "If the situation
surrounding Japan threatens our security, Japan can provide U.S. forces
with support."

Such talk reflects what diplomats and scholars call the defining drama
of East Asia for the 21st century -- the competition for economic and
political dominance in the region between Japan, the world's
second-largest economy, and China, the world's most populous nation and
a fast-developing economic and military power.

"I think the biggest challenge to Japan is going to be how it arranges
its relationship with China," the U.S. ambassador to Japan, Howard H.
Baker Jr., said on Wednesday. "But how they do that is going to say a
lot about stability in this region for years to come. . . . Japan is a
superpower; China is on its way to being a superpower. They are both
rich, they both have a history and tradition in this region, and they
don't much like each other, I think."

Analysts note that both China and Japan have substantial reasons for
restraint. Last year, China surpassed the United States as Japan's
number one trading partner, while massive investments by Japanese
companies in search of cheaper labor and larger markets have become a
driving factor behind China's blistering 9.5-percent annual growth
rate.

But if their economic relations are hot, politically the two nations
are cool. The Chinese complain about Koizumi's visits to Tokyo's
Yasukuni Shrine commemorating fallen warriors -- including World War II
war criminals. The two governments have also battled over the route of
a trans-Siberian pipeline for Russian oil and territorial rights in an
East China Sea island chain known as the Senkaku in Japanese and the
Diaoyu in Chinese.

The Chinese government granted rights two years ago for domestic and
foreign oil companies to explore and drill an area only three miles
from Japanese-claimed territory -- a region rich in natural gas and
oil. This month, Japan pushed back, boosting its claims to the area by
officially taking over ownership of a 15-foot lighthouse built on the
island chain by Japanese nationalist activists in 1978.

"It is time Japan began protecting what is ours," said Makoto Yamazaki,
director of the Japan Youth Association, which built the lighthouse and
freely handed it over to the government this month. "If our sovereignty
is being threatened, we have a right to defend ourselves."

But the idea of Japanese military cooperation with the United States in
the sea lanes north of Taiwan has particularly rankled Chinese
diplomatic and military planners because it goes to the heart of their
Taiwan strategy.

On the one hand, diplomats and other specialists say, the Chinese
military has embarked on a buildup of short-range missiles, naval
vessels and electronics-aided aircraft to enable it to threaten the
island militarily if President Chen Shui-bian should take what China
considers an unacceptably decisive step toward independence. On the
other hand, they added, China has set out to improve and extend its
maritime and airborne might in the sea lanes north of Taiwan, with the
goal of forcing the United States to think twice about military
intervention. Within the next five years, according to U.S. estimates,
the Chinese navy is expected to have more than 20 modern attack
submarines, including half a dozen nuclear-powered vessels.

Japanese officials said that the official position advocating a
peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue has not changed. They said the
constitution limits the level of assistance that Japan could offer in
the event of a U.S. confrontation with China over Taiwan. But the joint
statement on Saturday could help lay the groundwork for the Japanese to
extend as much cooperation as they legally can, including logistical
support such as transportation and medical rescue operations behind the
lines of combat, officials said.

"We consider China a friendly country, but it is also unpredictable," a
senior Japanese government official said. "If it takes aggressive
action, Japan cannot just stand by and watch."

Correspondent Edward Cody in Beijing and special correspondents Sachiko
Sakamaki and Akiko Yamamoto contributed to this report.




http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer


  #6  
Old February 20th 05, 05:50 AM
Red Rider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Randolph" wrote in message
news:BdPRd.84036$bu.35718@fed1read06...
Sadly, Cdr. Walter "Smokey" Stovall, Jim Flatley's co-pilot, passed away
from leukemia in Bethesda Naval Hospital in 1972.

An even stranger event was the landing aboard and immediate deck launch

from
USS Ranger of a U-2 in the mid 1960's. Anyone have the details on that?

It
was a secret operation and the majority of the crew were not allowed above
flight deck level during the op.

"W. D. Allen Sr." wrote in message
...
Does anyone know anything about the C-130 that made arrested landings

and
launches from a Navy aircraft carrier back in the 1960s?

WDA


The first test of a U-2 on a carrier were conducted in Aug (maybe it was
Oct) of 1963 on the Kitty Hawk off SoCal. The Ranger participated in test
for a couple of months in early '64 and the first operational mission of a
U-2 was flown from the Ranger in May '64 to look at the French Nuke test in
the pacific. In '69 a U-2R which had a greater range and payload underwent
sea trials on the America off the Va. Capes. This (these) U-2's had special
modified folding wings for carrier use. ( I know that there were five pilots
involved in these test but I don't know how many aircraft were used. I
believed there were 4, U-2R's modified for folding wings).

As far as keeping the crew below deck for these test, that just wasn't so.
You can't hide sh*t on a carrier. As usual during flight ops, all
non-essential personnel and lolly-gaggers were encouraged to stay below out
of the way. The crews on the Kitty Hawk and the Ranger knew what was going
on, and I'll be the crew of the America did too.

Red Rider


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Navy reassigns squadron leader aboard carrier Otis Willie Naval Aviation 6 November 2nd 04 04:03 AM
Four Navy avaitors on San Diego-based carrier listed as missing Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 August 11th 04 05:03 AM
Navy commander pilot passes 1,000th ‘trap’ aircraft carrier Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 July 16th 04 12:25 AM
Next Generation Aircraft Carrier Contract Awarded Otis Willie Naval Aviation 6 May 23rd 04 02:53 PM
If there is a drive for a "Euro navy," will Germany build a carrier? David E. Powell Naval Aviation 2 March 6th 04 05:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.