If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 12:40:53 +0000 (UTC), "John Mason"
wrote: "John Galloway" wrote in message ... ? add Discus 2CT (18m turbo) to your list. Of course it hasn't flown yet but will do fairly soon and deliveries start next year. The D2CT basically seems to be a single seat Duo in that it shares very similar wing design in wing section, swept plan form, and polydihedral and there seems to be every reason for it to share the Duo's exceptionally sensitive and benign handling characteristics. It also seems to have the new Maughmer winglets that seem pretty successful on the Ventus 2CX. These are my own thoughts and not based on any comments from the factory. Thanks for this information. The question does follow though: What improvement the Discus 18m can give on the flapped Ventus and why if it is a better aircraft than the Ventus that the factory consider it worth developing a new model rather than improve the Ventus? I suspect it is the case that the new Discus is really made to be a 15m club class option and they thought they could just stick on some wing extensions for those people who don't like flaps or for those 15m pilots to have the option of 18m as a low cost extra. If this is the case it doesn't sound like a solution designed for the job I need, which is a no compromise top performing ship. IMHO the benefits of a self launcher over a turbo are far outweighed by the extra cost, weight and maintenance demands of the SLMG. In the UK just take a winch launch and pop the engine out if you need more height instead of wasting money on an aerotow. For me weight is the only issue. I can afford the extra costs and can pay the extra for maintenance, I am not too bothered by the resale issue. I have a current PPL and so the SLMG PPL is no big deal. I do like the idea of being independent and not needing a club launch with its inevitable waiting around. For me this is the main trade off. Does the weight disadvantage of a self launcher compared to a turbo offset the advantages of time saving, independence and climb rate that you have with the self launcher? So really I have a two part question. 1. Turbo vs Self Launcher? 2. Which ship? Cheers, John John, Get a self launcher. You'll love it. Mike Borgelt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ventus C vs B | tango4 | Soaring | 6 | September 10th 03 03:29 AM |