A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 24th 04, 02:23 AM
Rats
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War?

US F86 sabres shot down a lot of Mig 15s in the Korean War. The ratio was
around 8 - 1. I recently watched a documentary about the confrontation
between these two planes. Apparently they were quite evenly matched with the
F86 having a slight overall advantage. In the end the high ratio was
attributed to the superiour skills and experience of the US pilots. Many of
them were WWII veterans while the North Korean and Chinese pilots had bugger
all experience. However what was interesting was that some Russian pilots
also flew against the US. Does anyone have any accurate records on what the
kill:loss ratio against Russian pilots in the Korean War were?


  #2  
Old January 24th 04, 06:04 AM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Rats" wrote:

US F86 sabres shot down a lot of Mig 15s in the Korean War. The ratio was
around 8 - 1. I recently watched a documentary about the confrontation
between these two planes. Apparently they were quite evenly matched with the
F86 having a slight overall advantage. In the end the high ratio was
attributed to the superiour skills and experience of the US pilots. Many of
them were WWII veterans while the North Korean and Chinese pilots had bugger
all experience. However what was interesting was that some Russian pilots
also flew against the US. Does anyone have any accurate records on what the
kill:loss ratio against Russian pilots in the Korean War were?



Michael Petukhov will probably tell us that NO Russian pilots were shot
down in the Korean War -- especially by Americans! He will probably tell
us that ALL the kills on Americans were by Russians.
  #3  
Old January 24th 04, 07:55 AM
Rats
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Petukhov will probably tell us that NO Russian pilots were shot
down in the Korean War -- especially by Americans! He will probably tell
us that ALL the kills on Americans were by Russians.


He's probably right!


  #4  
Old January 24th 04, 09:29 AM
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rats wrote:

US F86 sabres shot down a lot of Mig 15s in the Korean War. The ratio was
around 8 - 1. I recently watched a documentary about the confrontation
between these two planes. Apparently they were quite evenly matched with the
F86 having a slight overall advantage. In the end the high ratio was
attributed to the superiour skills and experience of the US pilots. Many of
them were WWII veterans while the North Korean and Chinese pilots had bugger
all experience. However what was interesting was that some Russian pilots
also flew against the US. Does anyone have any accurate records on what the
kill:loss ratio against Russian pilots in the Korean War were?


One of the former senior commanders (can't remember if he commanded the 64th IAK
or an IAD) stated that they'd lost about 335 MiG-15s, 300 in combat and the
others operational. That doesn't include Chinese or North Korean losses, and
the U.S. claims really increased after the Soviets went home. The book on
actual versus claimed kills still remains to be written, but here's a good URL
which has some more or less unbiased research from Soviet sources, comparing
them to US reports:

http://www.korean-war.com/ussraircombat.html

Here's an American-compiled chronology:

http://www.korean-war.com/AirChronology.html

and here's an excellent official source on U.S. Korean War losses:

http://www.dtic.mil/dpmo/pmkor/korwald.htm

Gu

  #5  
Old January 24th 04, 10:00 AM
Michael Petukhov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Rats" wrote in message ...
US F86 sabres shot down a lot of Mig 15s in the Korean War. The ratio was
around 8 - 1. I recently watched a documentary about the confrontation
between these two planes. Apparently they were quite evenly matched with the
F86 having a slight overall advantage. In the end the high ratio was
attributed to the superiour skills and experience of the US pilots. Many of
them were WWII veterans while the North Korean and Chinese pilots had bugger
all experience. However what was interesting was that some Russian pilots
also flew against the US. Does anyone have any accurate records on what the
kill:loss ratio against Russian pilots in the Korean War were?


Russia data shows a bit diffrent picture. According to recently
published official data "Russia and USSR in wars of XX century.
the statistical survey", ed. G.F. Krivisheev, Olma-press, 2001, Moscow.
p. 524. It says:

"... Totaly soviet pilots made 63000 sorties, participated in 1790
air battles, where they shot down 1309 enemy planes. ... Totaly
soviet Air forces lost 335 planes and 120 pilots in the war. Total
losses of soviet military personel in Korean war was 315 men including
168 officers and 147 sergants and soldiers."

Thus it is 1309/335 = 4:1 in our advantage.

Michael
  #6  
Old January 24th 04, 07:41 PM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Thus it is 1309/335 = 4:1 in our advantage.


As long as the reader accepts that the Soviet Union never told a lie (cof, cof,
cof). As for the claims:losses total, nothing in what you posted breaks out US
from Allied losses, so this doesn't answer the question of how many _US_ losses
were caused by Soviets. Seems downright strange that in 3 out of 4 cases that
a Soviet pilot engaged an enemy, he shot it down - thats a level of military
effectiveness that requires the reader to believe that Soviet pilots swept the
skies of Sabres. That didn't happen.

Authors of books depend on accuracy by both the pilots and the report-writers
that came before them, and since every AF in history overclaimed, there is no
reason to believe the Soviet AF didn't - since they wouldn't cross the Yalu out
of fear that their participation would be discovered, its far-fetched to
believe that they could have been in a position to verify every one of the
claims. So its "Claims vs Losses", not "Shot down US aircraft vs Soviet
Losses". If your statistic is supposes to represent the former category, then
yeah, that's probably accurate - 4:1 in "claims" is probably right.






  #7  
Old January 24th 04, 07:51 PM
Matt Wiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rats" wrote:
Michael Petukhov will probably tell us that

NO Russian pilots were shot
down in the Korean War -- especially by Americans!

He will probably tell
us that ALL the kills on Americans were by

Russians.

He's probably right!


Not necessarily. Check the ACIG.org lists of Korean War kills. There are
some by PRC pilots, and the NKAF. (not many though) But you're right about
poor Mikey likely saying that no Russians were shot down by Americans: that'd
be news to the F9F pilots from VF-781 on USS Oriskany (CVA-34) on 18 Nov
52: they were jumped by MiG-15s from Vladivostok. Two of the bad guys were
sent down into the Sea of Japan, the third was shot up and went RTB. And
this is just one example, there are plenty of kills listed on the site where
the victim was Soviet, and some of the pilots are named.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!
  #8  
Old January 24th 04, 08:42 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thus it is 1309/335 = 4:1 in our advantage.

ROFLMAO...you boob, even if the number 1309 is accurate, surely these include
B-29s, B-26s, F-51s, and other such prop driven aircraft. The question was
Soviet piloted MiG-15 versus the F-86. I realize English isn't you first
language, but your reading compression skills are awful.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #9  
Old January 25th 04, 12:28 AM
Ken Duffey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BUFDRVR wrote:

Thus it is 1309/335 = 4:1 in our advantage.


ROFLMAO...you boob, even if the number 1309 is accurate, surely these include
B-29s, B-26s, F-51s, and other such prop driven aircraft. The question was
Soviet piloted MiG-15 versus the F-86. I realize English isn't you first
language, but your reading compression skills are awful.

BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"


By 'compression', I take it you mean 'comprehension' ??

Pot ?? Kettle ??

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++
Ken Duffey - Flanker Freak & Russian Aviation Enthusiast
Flankers Website - http://www.flankers.co.uk/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++


  #10  
Old January 25th 04, 03:48 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
nt (Krztalizer) writes:


Thus it is 1309/335 = 4:1 in our advantage.


As long as the reader accepts that the Soviet Union never told a lie (cof, cof,
cof). As for the claims:losses total, nothing in what you posted breaks out US
from Allied losses, so this doesn't answer the question of how many _US_ losses
were caused by Soviets. Seems downright strange that in 3 out of 4 cases that
a Soviet pilot engaged an enemy, he shot it down - thats a level of military
effectiveness that requires the reader to believe that Soviet pilots swept the
skies of Sabres. That didn't happen.


Total U.S. losses, to _all_ causes, were abut 1300. Most of those
losses were to Flak, and operational losses.
There never were that many Sabres available. The initial 4th Fighter
Interceptor Wing deployment was 2 squadrons on the line, with one back
in Japan working up and standing Air Defence alert. Eventaully, they
were able to get logistics support and ramp space to get all 3
squadrons to Korea. That's 50-75 airplanes. When the 51st FIW
switched over to Sabres, they only had 2 squadrons - that makes 'bout
125 total. That stayed steady until the 8th and 18th Fighter Bomber
Wings, and 2 Sqn, SAAF, which was attached to them, converted in early
'53. So there never were all that many Sabres around to shoot at.

The Soviet Pilots, and their immediate commanders in Korea seem, in
those interviews that aren't being paid for in Vodka, to be giving
numbers that are pretty much in line with U.S. clains & losses, modulo
a bit of overclaiming on both sides.
Although what was being reported to the Staff back home may very well
be another matter - One of the processes allowed in confirming kills
on the Soviet side was "Battle Calculus" - basically the idea that if
you hosed off a full load of ammo at somebody, you _must_ have gotten
enough hits to knock him down. An official excuse for wishful
thinking. (Sort of like the old duck-hunting joke - two hunters in a
blind in a cold, clammy marsh. Suddenly a pair of ducks fly over.
The first hunter bangs off a pair of shots, and his bird falls. The
second fires off his, to no visible effect. Second hunter turns to
the first, asn says, "You;ve just witnessed a miracle - that's a dead
duck you see flying away".


Authors of books depend on accuracy by both the pilots and the report-writers
that came before them, and since every AF in history overclaimed, there is no
reason to believe the Soviet AF didn't - since they wouldn't cross the Yalu out
of fear that their participation would be discovered, its far-fetched to
believe that they could have been in a position to verify every one of the
claims. So its "Claims vs Losses", not "Shot down US aircraft vs Soviet
Losses". If your statistic is supposes to represent the former category, then
yeah, that's probably accurate - 4:1 in "claims" is probably right.




--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 11:19 AM
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA James Military Aviation 2 October 1st 03 11:25 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.