A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Monster



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 22nd 09, 02:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
S6
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Monster

Hi
I have been a DG, LS owner for 20 years. Mr Weber created this monster
13 years ago by encouraging us to use is facility. I have never
needed DG services to keep my aircraft airworthy. Last month I needed
information on L'Hotellier connection for my LS 6. I sent a email to
DG and voilà, 24 hours later I had all I needed without effort. I
have done this many time and DG personnel always encourage me to do so
by saying "you are very welcome". Now Mr Weber is creating another
monster with is taxes. I am not a business person but creating an
artificial need to extract money from potential customer is not a
smart move. I will have another sailplne, 18 meter. It will not be a
DG product!
Regards.
S6
  #2  
Old December 22nd 09, 11:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default Monster

http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/betreuung-e.html

The way I read the article.. pay the fee and get support.
Don't pay... no support. Need a part.. pay the fee, plus parts cost.. get
the part.. Pay the fee, get the life extension inspection details for 1/2
cost.

It will be interesting to see how the FAA views this, the Euro "feds"
require current manuals.. and updates.
granted our manuals must be current too, all ADs are downloadable from the
FAA web sites.

But to pay a fee to the builder company just for the privilege to fly
another year... ??
There are a lot of Schweizers out there for us recreational flyers..

BT

"S6" wrote in message
...
Hi
I have been a DG, LS owner for 20 years. Mr Weber created this monster
13 years ago by encouraging us to use is facility. I have never
needed DG services to keep my aircraft airworthy. Last month I needed
information on L'Hotellier connection for my LS 6. I sent a email to
DG and voilà, 24 hours later I had all I needed without effort. I
have done this many time and DG personnel always encourage me to do so
by saying "you are very welcome". Now Mr Weber is creating another
monster with is taxes. I am not a business person but creating an
artificial need to extract money from potential customer is not a
smart move. I will have another sailplne, 18 meter. It will not be a
DG product!
Regards.
S6


  #3  
Old December 23rd 09, 02:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Monster

BT wrote:
http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/betreuung-e.html

The way I read the article.. pay the fee and get support.
Don't pay... no support. Need a part.. pay the fee, plus parts cost.. get
the part.. Pay the fee, get the life extension inspection details for 1/2
cost.

It will be interesting to see how the FAA views this, the Euro "feds"
require current manuals.. and updates.
granted our manuals must be current too, all ADs are downloadable from the
FAA web sites.

But to pay a fee to the builder company just for the privilege to fly
another year... ??

While I'm not a fan of this method of recouping their expenses, I think
it's fair to say DG Flugzeugbau did not build the gliders that will be
charged the yearly fee. Those were built by the company that went
bankrupt. DG Flugzeugbau IS saying they will continue to support the
gliders THEY built without charge.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly
  #4  
Old December 23rd 09, 03:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
rlovinggood
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 268
Default Monster

How are "orphaned" Libelle's kept going?

Herr Hansjorg Striefeneder's company sees to it, I guess.

Who takes care of the Centrair's?

Hmmmm.

Will we LS drivers end up on the same forgotten island as the Centrair
drivers, or will a Streifeneder come along?



Ray Lovinggood
Carrboro, North Carolina, USA
LS1-d
(Who had no plans nor money available to move into anything else.)
  #5  
Old December 23rd 09, 04:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default Monster

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:09:26 -0800, rlovinggood wrote:

How are "orphaned" Libelles kept going?

See my previous post, but in summary, Glasfazer says that:

- all currently issued TNs and ADs are free and will remain so

- parts needed to carry them out will be available as normal.

I've looked into this because in the UK 201-13 (which was issued as
optional) will probably need to be completed before next season since
the front tailplane fastener failed on a British H.201B last year.
201-13 is outstanding on mine. If I'm required to implement it I'll
simply order the parts from Glasfazer and fit them during my next
annual in Feb.

- the last free TN is 201-37 and its equivalent for all other Glasflügel
gliders. This TN describes transponder installation.

- any future TNs will be charged for to cover the costs of designing
and writing up the procedure together with the EASA fee for issuing
it[1]. These costs will be added to the cost of replacement parts, etc.

[1] Paying a contribution toward Glasfazer's costs seems fair enough.
201-37 was issued when transponders became mandatory in Germany and
writing it required a fair amount of design effort by Glasfazer. Its
reasonable that an owner should share the design and documentation costs
but I find it obnoxious that the European Aviation *Safety* Agency should
charge a fee to people who document a *safety* issue when its handed to
them on a plate ready for distribution.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
There is a monster eating the moon! Blueskies Piloting 7 February 21st 08 03:57 AM
F-14 vs. Monster [email protected] Naval Aviation 3 September 24th 07 06:28 PM
Follow up to monster thread below re IAS and TAS and power required... xerj Piloting 11 February 5th 07 10:45 PM
Monster garage car/plane build Corky Scott Home Built 23 June 10th 05 02:29 PM
Monster birds attack planes ! Tom-Alex Soorhull Instrument Flight Rules 0 May 15th 04 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.