|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#29
September 19th 06, 01:26 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Cessna Cardinal 177 RG II v. Piper Arrow III (70s) v. Piper Arrow III (brand new)
In article
, john smith wrote: In article , "Dan Luke" wrote: "john smith" wrote: There is one downside of this treatment: the fluid will weep out of seams in the airplane for several months and attract dirt, requiring additional washing. Not to mention the increasing weight and change of W/B each application. How much? What is the weight/volume of the contents you apply? How many volumes have been applied over the years? 7.1 lbs/gal according to the CorrosionX website. It also says 0.5 gal for a C172 application. Round to 3.5 lbs/application. For every two applications, you lose one gallon of fuel weight. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anti collision light mod for Piper Arrow 1968 model? | Frode Berg | Owning | 4 | May 20th 04 05:16 AM |
| $15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Aviation Marketplace | 17 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
| $15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Owning | 18 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
| $15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Piloting | 17 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
| Piper Archer III or Cessna 172SP | Dale Harwell | Owning | 10 | July 15th 03 04:01 AM |
Threaded Mode