If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches
"Scott Moore" wrote in message ... Speaking only for myself, its pretty damm confusing exactly what would be done with WAAS even if implemented. Garmins' other units that accept WAAS is now implemented and IFR approved as of the past week. If a receiver were approved for WAAS approaches, then TODAY you could use VNAV/LNAV miniums on GPS RNAV approaches instead of LNAV minimums. Presumably (though I am not certain) a VNAV/LNAV GPS RNAV approach would be considered a precision approach. UPSAT's CNX80 web page touts the airports you have access to today with WAAS; yet the version of the POH supplement posted on their site says in the legal fineprint that precision approaches are NOT permitted. So I am not certain if you can or cannot fly VNAV/LNAV GPS approach mininums TODAY on a CNX-80. What I would like to see from Garmin is a controlled descent option on non-precision GPS approaches, which would be perfectly legal to implement right now (because it is inside the "dive and drive" If you want to do this as a backup to other navigation, you can do this now with the VNAV function on the Garmin 430/530, albeit not yet with WAAS. Nonetheless, there is a big question whether this will make sense for an approach not explicitly designed as a precision approach. Many non-precision approaches have a missed approach point from which a suitable straight-in landing cannot be made; so you could well have a controlled descent to the middle of the field an then in turn have to circle. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|