BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA

"Blueskies" wrote in message
. ..

" jls" wrote in message
.. .

snip
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?



Supreme Court of da US



Wouldn't that be SCODUS?

Oops, yep, you is right. And ain't you full o' wit this mornin'?



The 'da' is silent when written. G

Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

odigy.com...

I'd vote for apathy.


Nobody cares about apathy.

Q: What's the difference between ignorance and apathy?


Ignorance is when you don't know any better.

Apathy is when you may or may not know better but you don't give a damn.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

"RobertR237" wrote in message
...
odigy.com...

I'd vote for apathy.


Nobody cares about apathy.

Q: What's the difference between ignorance and apathy?


Ignorance is when you don't know any better.

Apathy is when you may or may not know better but you don't give a damn.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

Scroll down on my original post.

Tim Ward

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
om...

I'd say we're about at the complacent stage.....

I'd vote for apathy.

Who cares?

In article , John Harlow says...
No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else choose
to marry.

Then I suppose it's OK for someone to choose to marry young boys as NAMBLA
supports, or young girls ,or 2 women or 10 women or your favorite sheep
BAAAbara or a goat or your Sister etc. I wonder just who's business it is to
prevent those marriages or are all those marriages OK in your eyes ? Do you have
any boundaries? and if so why is it any of your damn business?

Chuck S

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:11:22 -0700, "C J Campbell"
wrote:


"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
. com...

I'd say we're about at the complacent stage.....

I'd vote for apathy.

Who cares?


Holy Cow, how many responses to the original thread were there before
this turned into another ****ing match for the ideological high
ground, two, three? I trust you ardent patriots contacted your
congressman and suggested he try to get the SPCA to come put this
Weiner nut down before he hurts someone.

Ed Sullivan

On 11 Sep 2004 21:30:51 GMT, (G EddieA95) wrote:

If you think that a "resistance" movement carrying pistols and hunting rifles
could stop a dictatorship having the most powerful armed force on the planet,
you are deluding yourself.

A good man with a typical scoped, bolt action hunting rifle can have
any other weapon that he wants. Look at the trouble a few thousand
****heads armed with smallarms, RPGs, and improvised explosive devices
are causing for our troops over in Iraq. Even if only a small
percentage of US gunowners were to take arms against their government,
that is still hundreds of thousands or perhaps even millions.

If tyranny comes to the US, most people will put up with it, at least for a
generation or 3.

Our government seems to agree with you, and you may be right.


================================================== ==
Del Rawlins--
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply

jls wrote:

He's talking about the 2nd Amendment. The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute. The right has been tied to the state militias as not an
individual right.

As far as I know, this is not correct. The only statement of SCOTUS on this matter
with which I am familiar is a statement to the effect that "the right of the people"
definitely is an individual right. This is based on the fact that the only two other
places in the Bill of Rights in which this phrase occurs cannot by any stretch of the
imagination be interpreted otherwise. To what case are you referring?

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

"RobertR237" wrote in message ...


"Blueskies" wrote in message
...

" jls" wrote in message
. ..

snip
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?



Supreme Court of da US



Wouldn't that be SCODUS?

Oops, yep, you is right. And ain't you full o' wit this mornin'?



The 'da' is silent when written. G

Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)



Ok, it's "Supreme Court ofda US"...

....SCOUS

From: "Blueskies"
Date: 9/12/2004 6:54 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id: m


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
. com...
"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
.com...

I'd vote for apathy.


Nobody cares about apathy.


So what!

Here's a couple of quarters. Call someone who cares.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired