If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
You'll probably get interestingly different sets of answers, with some
overlap, from various angles, such as pilots; generals/admirals/military historians; social historians; businessmen; technology historians; and members of the public (with many people integrating one or more of these perspectives, of course). Here are a few thoughts of mine, with apologies for a US-centric perspective and with no claim on being all-inclusive or even necessarily right. Herewith some breakthrough technologies, some pinnacles of known art, and some that were just perfect for their time... as well as a few notable individual aircraft. Here I omit subsystems, weapons, unmanned platforms (despite a great temptation to take a guess at something from the UCAV arena) and anything of primarily an orbital nature. * WRIGHT FLYER, hopefully to be remembered as an *engineering* achievement by a couple of people who genuinely knew what they were doing, the popular image involving bicycle mechanics notwithstanding. * FOKKER TRIPLANE. "Drat you, Red Baron." I'd bet that this is *the* visual image of a WWI fighter that pops into most people's minds, even if the words they think of are "Spad" or "Sopwith Camel." * CURTISS "JENNY". Of no importance in the war, but of great importance in the peace, at least in the US -- important in establishing the nascent notion of airmail as a realistic proposition (with concomitant strides in air navigation), and important as the first glimpse of a plane, and maybe the first hop, for who knows how many people, sometimes creating a dream that never died. * SPIRIT OF ST. LOUIS. The Atlantic had been crossed before, but single-engine and solo really captured the popular imagination remarkably. * FORD TRIMOTOR. The idea of 12 passengers and a stewardess who also has to be qualified as a nurse may not be awfully reassuring to the white-knuckled flyer accustomed to jets, but the "Tin Goose" is widely credited with making air travel a commercial proposition. * HINDENBURG. Not the first aviation tragedy, of course, but the first big one and the first witnessed by the media. The "O the humanity" radio announcement and the picture of it half-burned in midair are doubtless recognized by many people who know little if anything else about the long-ago heyday of the zeppelin. * DC-3. Hit a real sweet spot in size, performance, and operating cost for the airlines of the day, then served memorably in the war... and kept going. * P-51. The arguments about which was the best fighter of the war and/or the propeller era will never end, but there's no doubt that it was an excellent one -- and that it could take its bit of the war all the way and back again with a fight in between. * F-86. In an era when technology was evolving so fast that a few years made a huge difference, this was the right fighter at the right time. * B-52. For better or worse, the symbol as well as a pre-eminent tool of US will to win the Cold War and to project power worldwide. * C-130. Won't win any beauty contests, but seems likely to remain in service and probably in production until termites evolve to consume aluminum. * SR-71. Looked like a study-hall fantasy that actually got built, with performance to match. Not exactly the most versatile jet in the inventory, but did its one thing pretty much unimpeachably for a long time. * LEAR JET. Not the first, biggest, etc. bizjet, but visually iconic and with enough range to get from Carly Simon to Sheryl Crow nonstop. * 707. The first practical passenger jet, with a similarly revolutionary military cousin... * F-111. Alas, its place in history is mostly that of a negative example in specifying requirements and managing projects, overshadowing how it evolved into a useful and long-serving aircraft. * Huey. Not just important, but to a couple of generations, the very image of what a helo *sounds* like. * DC-9. Short-haul jet travel for the masses, and (in a much evolved form) still in production. * 747. An audacious business move as well as a technological achievement. * Concorde. It may have been the answer to a question no market was asking, but what a glorious answer! The notion of England and various European countries collaborating on an aerospace project has also of course been revisited a number of times to great profit. * Harrier. Long after the arguments about its combat utility and survivability have ended, the "jump jet" image will linger. * F-15. Nothing exceeds like excess. Thankfully untested in the big war against first-rank opponents it was designed for. * F-117A. A cloud no bigger than a man's hand on the horizon (and not on the radar scope at all) for the titanium corner-reflector era of combat aircraft. Future bets (with the caveat that there will be so few types they'll all be memorable): A380 win or lose; JSF; 7E7. Thoughts? --Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |