A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 30th 04, 12:37 AM
Greasy Rider @ Invalid.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:19:05 GMT, "Jarg"
proclaimed:

But an great tactic to avoid having your nose rubbed in a losing an
argument! And did you notice that the "personal insults" didn't
actually occur? I'm afraid the poor guy is deteriorating quickly.


I don't follow the adventures of Mr. Kramer but occasionally discover
him embroiled in some misadventure. I think his ego is his greatest
problem along with some sensitivity to probing. I have a great deal of
respect for accomplished aviators but some may need to stick to their
laurels. It's easier to admire the silent type than one who opens his
mouth and promptly sticks his foot in it.
  #12  
Old June 30th 04, 04:13 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

You obviously don't know what caselaw is. Caselaw is the ultimate

credibility
in a supreme court decision. And since you have descended to personal
insults...PLONK !


What personal insult?


  #13  
Old June 30th 04, 12:38 PM
tscottme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

You obviously don't know what caselaw is. Caselaw is the ultimate

credibility
in a supreme court decision. And since you have descended to personal
insults...PLONK !



That's the weakest surrender in an argument I've ever seen in a news group.
What exactly was the personal insult? When you wrongly throw around an
epithet and then can't support your claim, what do you want? Essentially
hiding from him only places neon lights around what should be your
embarrasment.

Neocons are former liberals, usually Jewish, that found that the Democrats
had turned to chic radicalism simply for the sake of trying to impress their
cohorts rather than actually supporting ghastly ideas like tolerance,
respect for the individual, end to predjudice, and rational defense of
freedom. Neo, in that they are newly-minted conservatives in comparison to
us that have always been conservative, sometime called paleocon. The
Neocons are the last ones in the RNC to buy the religious arguments some
would prefer. They are among the most secular in the party. But don't let
any facts get between your high blood pressure and your keyboard.


--
Scott

"I don't need to know very much about you or your ideas to know that if you
think Michael Moore is just great, a truth-teller and a much-needed tonic
for everything that is wrong in American life, you are not someone to take
seriously about anything of political consequence, or you are French. But I
repeat myself." - Jonah Goldberg


  #14  
Old June 30th 04, 12:51 PM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Neocons are former liberals, usually Jewish, that found that the Democrats
had turned to chic radicalism simply for the sake of trying to impress their
cohorts rather than actually supporting ghastly ideas like tolerance,
respect for the individual, end to predjudice, and rational defense of
freedom. Neo, in that they are newly-minted conservatives in comparison to
us that have always been conservative, sometime called paleocon. The
Neocons are the last ones in the RNC to buy the religious arguments some
would prefer. They are among the most secular in the party. But don't let
any facts get between your high blood pressure and your keyboard.



I found the comment about William F Buckley and National Review being so bad
and "Neocon" amusing. WFB has been a conservative all his life, has had
National Review for 50 years, and is for drug legalization. The magazine is a
journal of intelligent conservative/libertarian political discourse.

If one wants emotional sloganeering and someone who plays fast and loose with
the facts, just go to the movie theatre


Ron
PA-31T Cheyenne II
Maharashtra Weather Modification Program
Pune, India

  #16  
Old June 30th 04, 02:20 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ArtKramr wrote:

And there is draft talk.


From Democrats in Congress and a few Republicans, the administration has said
repeatedly stated there is no need for a draft and they will not ask for one.
According to a political analyst in Newsweek magazine (or was it Time?), this
whole "draft scare" is the democrats trying to scare the younger males into
voting for Kerry. But you know what Art, don't let facts get in the way of your
"thinking".


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #20  
Old June 30th 04, 10:38 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: (Regnirps)
Date: 6/30/2004 2:12 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

(ArtKramr) wrote:

That is what they were, not what they are now. You are living in the past as
are most neocons and helping the present administration to wreck our
country,.Rumsfeld is a disaster going to a phony war without enough troops
and now they are recalling troops that have already served more than they
should. And there is draft talk. Is there no end as to how destructive the
neocons can be?. Well, it will all come to an end in November. Cry the

beloved
coubtry.


It is tough to do it right when you get hit and then find that Clinton cut:

709,000 REGULAR (ACTIVE DUTY) PERSONNEL.

293,000 RESERVE TROOPS.

EIGHT STANDING ARMY DIVISIONS.

20 AIR FORCE AND NAVY AIR WINGS WITH 2,000 COMBAT AIRCRAFT.

232 STRATEGIC BOMBERS.

19 STRATEGIC BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES WITH 3,114 NUCLEAR WARHEADS ON*232
MISSILES.
500 ICBMs WITH 1,950 WARHEADS.

FOUR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS AND 121 SURFACE COMBAT SHIPS AND SUBMARINES PLUS*ALL
THE
SUPPORT BASES, SHIPYARDS, AND LOGISTICAL ASSETS NEEDED TO SUSTAIN*SUCH A
NAVAL
FORCE.

Remember when he "cut the size of government"?

-- Charlie Springer



I guess Clinton never planned on attacking a nation that never threatened the
U.S. based on WMD that they never had.

Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
best president ever Be Kind Military Aviation 6 February 16th 04 06:59 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Families of soldiers condemn Bush's war Mark Test Military Aviation 40 November 16th 03 08:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.