If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
If you refer to
http://www.fai.org/gliding/bureau2006_2 minutes of the FAI Gliding Commission Bureau meeting, you will find: 'A2.8 Discussion on Class structure in the “light-end” RS explained the problem we have at the light end, where a fairly limited number of aircraft are divided into 3 categories. It was decided to work towards a solution where the existing World Class was extended to include the other gliders after 2009. This could e.g. be with a max take off weight of 300 kg, including motor gliders, and possibly with max. 13 meter wingspan. The PW-5 should be allowed under grandfather rules. Action: RS and AR to develop year-2 proposal for extension of the World Class after 2009. Action: BH to check the FAI rules about changing a class definition. It was not considered worth creating a competition class for the “less than 80 kg” class.' This seems to indicate that from 2009 aircraft other than PW-5s will be eligible to compete in a new World Class. Heads up for Sparrowhawks and Russias, among others. Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
On Sep 29, 3:22 pm, Ian Cant
wrote: If you refer to http://www.fai.org/gliding/bureau2006_2 minutes of the FAI Gliding Commission Bureau meeting, you will find: 'A2.8 Discussion on Class structure in the "light-end" RS explained the problem we have at the light end, where a fairly limited number of aircraft are divided into 3 categories. It was decided to work towards a solution where the existing World Class was extended to include the other gliders after 2009. This could e.g. be with a max take off weight of 300 kg, including motor gliders, and possibly with max. 13 meter wingspan. The PW-5 should be allowed under grandfather rules. Action: RS and AR to develop year-2 proposal for extension of the World Class after 2009. Action: BH to check the FAI rules about changing a class definition. It was not considered worth creating a competition class for the "less than 80 kg" class.' This seems to indicate that from 2009 aircraft other than PW-5s will be eligible to compete in a new World Class. Heads up for Sparrowhawks and Russias, among others. Ian Soon we will see a very good 13m glider ....for $120,000.-only. And the happy owner will be a World Class Champion. Was that an original idea behind the World Class? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
On Oct 3, 3:52 pm, wrote:
Soon we will see a very good 13m glider ....for $120,000.-only. And the happy owner will be a World Class Champion. Was that an original idea behind the World Class? Richard, The original idea behind the World Class has been a failure. That much is obvious (to me) and should be acknowledged. We need to try a new and different idea. I can see opening the PW5 only contests to similar designs to increase the number of gliders. More gliders would mean a better competition. I personally would propose the following criteria: a) Fairly strict 1 design. b) Decent performance for the cheapest cost. For decent performance I think 35/1 would be good enough. Lower performance is just frustrating when trying XC. I would not "dumb down" the design to accommodate early solo pilots, but aim for entry level comp pilots. Todd Smith Grob 102 "3S" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
On Oct 3, 5:10 pm, toad wrote:
On Oct 3, 3:52 pm, wrote: Soon we will see a very good 13m glider ....for $120,000.-only. And the happy owner will be a World Class Champion. Was that an original idea behind the World Class? Richard, The original idea behind the World Class has been a failure. That much is obvious (to me) and should be acknowledged. We need to try a new and different idea. I can see opening the PW5 only contests to similar designs to increase the number of gliders. More gliders would mean a better competition. I personally would propose the following criteria: a) Fairly strict 1 design. b) Decent performance for the cheapest cost. For decent performance I think 35/1 would be good enough. Lower performance is just frustrating when trying XC. I would not "dumb down" the design to accommodate early solo pilots, but aim for entry level comp pilots. Todd Smith Grob 102 "3S" Todd, OK, some of the aspects of original idea had to be a failure and the whole undertaking simply didn't work. But, can you tell which specs were wrong? * substantially lower costs than then-current new gliders * easy & safe handling in the air and on the ground * a single design, stabilized for a period of years * performance sufficient for badges & challenging competition * simple construction * suitable for clubs, private owners & early solo pilots. What would be your new World Class glider ? Try to stay below $ 60,000.-please. Richard/ PW-5/N153PW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
On Oct 3, 7:12 pm, wrote:
On Oct 3, 5:10 pm, toad wrote: On Oct 3, 3:52 pm, wrote: Soon we will see a very good 13m glider ....for $120,000.-only. And the happy owner will be a World Class Champion. Was that an original idea behind the World Class? Richard, The original idea behind the World Class has been a failure. That much is obvious (to me) and should be acknowledged. We need to try a new and different idea. I can see opening the PW5 only contests to similar designs to increase the number of gliders. More gliders would mean a better competition. I personally would propose the following criteria: a) Fairly strict 1 design. b) Decent performance for the cheapest cost. For decent performance I think 35/1 would be good enough. Lower performance is just frustrating when trying XC. I would not "dumb down" the design to accommodate early solo pilots, but aim for entry level comp pilots. Todd Smith Grob 102 "3S" Todd, OK, some of the aspects of original idea had to be a failure and the whole undertaking simply didn't work. But, can you tell which specs were wrong? * substantially lower costs than then-current new gliders Great. * easy & safe handling in the air and on the ground Great * a single design, stabilized for a period of years Great * performance sufficient for badges & challenging competition Great idea, but the PW5 performance is not enough. * simple construction Great * suitable for clubs, private owners & early solo pilots. Bad idea to require suitability for early solo pilot. This led to unneeded "dumbing down" of the design. Specific features such as the nose wheel and non-retractable landing gear. It also leads to sacrificing performance for easier handling. I think that the design point to aim for is a glider that a newly licensed pilot, who has done some XC in a club glider and wants a glider to fly, would find roughly comparable to a Grob 102, Std Cirrus, LS4. The possiblilty of one design competition would be a good additional incentive to buy the "2nd generation" world class glider. But the glider would have to be similar in performance to other gliders that the new XC pilot might also want. What would be your new World Class glider ? Try to stay below $ 60,000.-please. Richard/ PW-5/N153PW Maybe the new Sparrowhawk or Silent has enough performance for cheap enough ? Maybe build Std Cirrus's or LS4's. Simplify the construction if needed. But if a design can not be found that has sufficiently good performance for a low enough price, then the world class idea will never work. It doesn't have to be 50/1, but it does have to be good enough that weak days are not so painful. Todd 3S |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
Soon we will see a very good 13m glider ....for
$120,000.-only. And the happy owner will be a World Class Champion. Was that an original idea behind the World Class? If I recall correctly, the major aim of the World Class concept was to make competition soaring more accessible by keeping the cost down. The lower performance level and the single-design concepts arose from this aim [one design to allow mass production and the savings therefrom]. Unfortunately the masses did not buy the PW-5. Perhaps a reasonable class could be built from all the 13m and below sailplanes that are now around, typically with 30 or 35:1 L/Ds and easier retrieve characteristics than bigger ships. A set of rules can be built around the existing designs without denying entry to newer and better designs. Contrary to advertised beliefs, 30:1 is plenty for X-C [20:1 is plenty for the 1-26 guys]. But how do we keep the cost under control ? Well, my only semi-facetious suggestion would be to have a rule that the top three in any National-level contest have to offer their ships, fully equipped as flown, for sale at a fixed price immediately afterwards. Take $40,000 as a random number. Will anyone really want to buy a championship with a $60,000 ship if he has to sell it for $40,000 afterwards ? It would be snapped up. But the $20,000 ship that wins would probably not be sellable at $40,000 and the owner could keep it to fly another day. As a reference point, the Sparrowhawk is perhaps the highest performance 13m ship around, and I believe it still sells for below $40,000. And my aging Russia would be competitive; it cost me $19,000 new a few years ago; even with a trailer and flight recorder and oxygen etc and CA sales tax, it still came in at well below $25,000. It could be done. With 60 or so Russias, maybe 50 PW-5s, a growing number of Sparrowhawks and a sprinkling of Apis and Silents we should have a viable nucleus of a fleet. And if it works, more people may be enticed to join in affordable competive soaring. Ian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
Perhaps a reasonable class could be built from all
the 13m and below sailplanes that are now around, typically with 30 or 35:1 L/Ds and easier retrieve characteristics than bigger ships. It could be done. With 60 or so Russias, maybe 50 PW-5s, a growing number of Sparrowhawks and a sprinkling of Apis and Silents we should have a viable nucleus of a fleet. And if it works, more people may be enticed to join in affordable competive soaring. It's nice to hear there is now consideration to expand the world class beyond the PW5. I've enjoyed the last two Region 9 competitions flying my L33. The Solo was designed as a candidate for the world class one design and, as of this year, has the identical hadicap as the PW5 for SSA Sports class and OLC. Hopefully it will also be considered as eligible for the expanded world class. Horst L33 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
On Oct 3, 10:25 pm, wrote:
Perhaps a reasonable class could be built from all the 13m and below sailplanes that are now around, typically with 30 or 35:1 L/Ds and easier retrieve characteristics than bigger ships. It could be done. With 60 or so Russias, maybe 50 PW-5s, a growing number of Sparrowhawks and a sprinkling of Apis and Silents we should have a viable nucleus of a fleet. And if it works, more people may be enticed to join in affordable competive soaring. It's nice to hear there is now consideration to expand the world class beyond the PW5. I've enjoyed the last two Region 9 competitions flying my L33. The Solo was designed as a candidate for the world class one design and, as of this year, has the identical hadicap as the PW5 for SSA Sports class and OLC. Hopefully it will also be considered as eligible for the expanded world class. Horst L33 Russia, Sparrowhawk, Apis, Silent, L33, PW-5....... you all are very welcome in Club B . Why you need to include them into World Class ?.Why pretend that this odd bunch of gliders makes a One Design Class ? They are a very different gliders. They do not have much in common. O, maybe except for fact that nobody can make any profit on their production. Leave the PW-5 alone. If it as a World Class die...it will die, let it be. Possibly with a Club B we don't need a World Class at all. Richard/ PW-5 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
Cheap with performance...then lets pitch the one design(which
is really who can trick out their ship the most and gain L/d, thus defeating the concept) Run any ship within certain handicaps...a range that go from Russias and PW5 up to LS4? Keep the handicap. One can try to get the cheapest glider with the best handicap, or something a little more expensive that takes a bigger hit. Not including LS4's in this group would be a big mistake IMVHO, they are good performers and relatively cheap used...is that not the objective? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Expanded World Class
Stewart Kissel wrote:
Cheap with performance...then lets pitch the one design(which is really who can trick out their ship the most and gain L/d, thus defeating the concept) I don't think so, as the usual "tricks" won't add more than a few percentage points, and are available to all of the competitors anyway. In any case, the cost of these "tricks" is a lot less than the "tricks" the manufacturers can add to their new gliders, and then the competitors do the usual tricks in addition. New glider + usual tricks is a significant gain in performance and cost. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: PW-5 World Class Sailplane | Mike I Green[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | May 11th 07 05:30 AM |
FS: PW-5 World Class Sailplane | Mike I Green[_2_] | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | May 1st 07 04:50 PM |
Is everybody afraid of World Class? | Jacek Kobiesa | Soaring | 79 | August 27th 04 10:47 PM |
Is everybody afraid of World Class ... | Dead Cat | Soaring | 1 | August 23rd 04 11:21 AM |
US Standard Class and World Class Nationals at Hobbs | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 7 | July 16th 04 04:03 AM |