If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote in message ... Most of it comes from taxes on airline tickets. And airlines generate most of the costs. The average G/A guy who flys a Cessna 182 100 hours a year doesn't begin to pay for the system. The average G/A who flies a Cessna 182 100 hours a year doesn't begin to burden the system. Not since the advent of GPS approaches. Thousands have been issued for small airports, and those cost just as much as a GPS approach for Green Bay Interuniversal Skyport. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
"SNIP"
I am not only pro choice, I am pro-abortion, I believe there should be a licensing procedure to ensure prospective parents are up to the task, physically, emotionally and financially. Until they can prove that, they should be chemically sterilized. Should we also perform a mecry killing on all of our seniors when they get to the point the can no longer take care of themselves. Maybe we should also put down newborns with any physical, mental or genetic abnormalidies. Surely they would be more inconvenient at having an healthly, but unwanted baby. We kill millions of the latter in this country each year...so given your logic, why don't we just expand the practice a bit. Then we can ultimately expand the practice a bit more to encompase stupidity...and your ticket will be up. It is all called murder you moron. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Judah wrote:
How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? By making the entire pie larger. Matt |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Stadt wrote:
"Judah" wrote in message ... "Dave Stadt" wrote in m: "Judah" wrote in message ... How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? By applying themselves and earning what they accumulate. If you are smart and work hard you win. If you are dumb and sit at home waiting for the welfare check you lose. Ahhh... So that's why my brilliant seventh grade science teacher is so wealthy, and Mike Tyson, who can barely speak english, is so broke! In fact Mike Tyson is broke. His current net worth is a couple of thousand dollars. Tyson didn't sit home waiting for a government check although he might well end up in that situation. If in fact the science teacher is brilliant the opportunity to increase earnings is readily available. And not everyone is driven by wealth creation. A lot of teachers, scientists, etc., really are driven by other motiviations. I know that is hard for many to believe, but it is true. Matt |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
S Green wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... darwin smith wrote: Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Anti-abortion IS pro-life. Even when there is no exception to save the life of the mother? Many conservatives have agreed to this exception. However, it isn't all that clear as very few cases are such that the mother's life is guaranteed to be at risk. The baby's life IS guaranteed to be at risk in an abortion. So even with this exception, you are still guaranteeing a death to save the possibility of a death. I'm still not sure that is a good moral position to aspire to, but at least it is better than most abortions which are simply murder for the sake of convenience. That isn't morally acceptable. Execution in the name of revenge is not morally acceptable either. I agree, which is why only the government should have such authority, not the individuals who were wronged. That latter would be revenge, the former is not. Deliberately killing a person is murder and is a moral crime. Sorry, but killing and murder aren't the same. Killing in defense of one's own life is not murder and is moral. Matt |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
How much damage do you think a car is going to do to a highway that was
built to support trucks? Actually for ALL practical purposes....heavy trucks DO ALL the damage to a properly engineered roadway.... The same is true for heavy aircraft vs little light ones on runways...I know because I worked in a runway/pavement engineering group for a few years.... Another interesting tidbid is the damage done is VERY non-linear..... A road/runway can take millions and millions of load cycles at say 90 percent of its design load, virtually an infinite number at say 50 percent or less, and somelike only a few hundred at 100 percent...and only a few at 105 percent.... So, truckers can bitch all they want about paying all those "taxes" but I guarantee you they do ALL the damage as well...(same goes for heavy airplanes)... And this brings up a few more points....if cheap/stupid politicians would just make the damn roads a smidgen thicker (and costing a smidgen more) the roads would last so long the'd generally need no repairs until it was time to tear them up because they had become outdated and need to be redesigned... And legal Folks need to be REALLY tough (as in cut your balls off and take the truck away) for overloaded trucks...because it only takes a few or even one to exceed the load limit of a road and once that road is "broken", further road cycles at MUCH less than the design limit will rapidly and continously cause further degradation... take care Blll |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Judah wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in link.net: How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? By creating wealth. Ex Nihilo? Perhaps you mean 'Creatio Ex Nihilo', create something out of nothing. If so, you claim that the value of labor = zero. Marx would not approve. |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
I would hardly call Libertarians very conservative. While the free market
position could lead one to think that ... the general approach of us being able to do our own thing as long as we don't interfere with others exercising that same freedom is a long way away from the ultra conservative approach. They want to control our every action and make our moral judgements for us. The Libertarians I know .. like me .. believe in maximum liberty and minimum government to the extent that it's practical. The problem with the Republicrats is one wants to control our bank account and one wants to control our bedroom. With Libertarians .. at this point .. having little practical political power we're forced to choose between the extreme right or the extreme left. http://www.libertarian.org/policy.html "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Otis Winslow" wrote in message .. . Go he http://www.libertarian.org/index2.html The Hoover Institute is the leading libertarian think tank in America and it is very conservative. In fact, outside the Hoover Institute libertarians have had little power in the US since FDR's Presidency began. Libertarians inside the Republican Party were responsible for the "balanced budget" we had a few years ago. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... So now you have 'conservatives' running around talking about property rights and states' rights Republicans have always supported States' rights, as that is the basis of a republic. (originally created to protect slavery) Democrats wanted the 3/5 law and Republicans were not willing to go to war over it and as long as libertarins could control the purse everyone was willing to leave things be for a while. and protecting large corporations while espousing populist principles. The libertarian wing (once Federalists) of the Republican Party insistthey address the issues of fiscal responsibility and a small central government, but libertarians are out of favor now due to their isolationist tendancies. And you have the 'liberals' running around trying to limit free speech and press, disarming the public, and supporting the worst thugs and despots imaginable in other countries in the name of 'diversity' and 'tolerance.' Racism has always been the Democrats' product. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Owning | 314 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |