A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why was the SB2C refered to as the "Beast" when the TBF was bigger?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 4th 05, 06:06 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why was the SB2C refered to as the "Beast" when the TBF was bigger?


The Grumman TBF/TBM seems to be a pretty big plane at 54 feet wingspan
and 40 foot length.
The SB2C is only 50 feet by 37. I haven't looked at all World War 2
carrier planes,
but the TBF is bigger than the F6F (and thus F4F by default) Heck,
even the F4U is
only 41 x 33.5 feet.

Was the name "Beast" in reference to horsepower or flying
characteristics?

That, brings up another question: what was the largest planes used on
WW2 carriers?
(Not counting B-25 for Mitchels Raid)

  #3  
Old October 4th 05, 01:44 PM
Edwin Gless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AF

wrote in message
ups.com...

The Grumman TBF/TBM seems to be a pretty big plane at 54 feet wingspan
and 40 foot length.
The SB2C is only 50 feet by 37. I haven't looked at all World War 2
carrier planes,
but the TBF is bigger than the F6F (and thus F4F by default) Heck,
even the F4U is
only 41 x 33.5 feet.

Was the name "Beast" in reference to horsepower or flying
characteristics?

That, brings up another question: what was the largest planes used on
WW2 carriers?
(Not counting B-25 for Mitchels Raid)



  #4  
Old October 4th 05, 01:51 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Edwin Gless" wrote in message
news:WOu0f.8$C51.6@trnddc07...

AF


First flight of the Grumman Guardian was on December 19th, 1945.


  #5  
Old October 4th 05, 01:53 PM
Andrew Robert Breen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article WOu0f.8$C51.6@trnddc07, Edwin Gless wrote:

That, brings up another question: what was the largest planes used on
WW2 carriers?
(Not counting B-25 for Mitchels Raid)


De Havilland Sea Mosquito? IIRC they became operational from 'carriers
shortly before VJ day. Must have been quite a prospect for deck
handling.

--
Andy Breen ~ Speaking for myself, not the University of Wales
"your suggestion rates at four monkeys for six weeks"
(Peter D. Rieden)

  #6  
Old October 4th 05, 01:59 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
ups.com...

That, brings up another question: what was the largest planes used on
WW2 carriers?
(Not counting B-25 for Mitchels Raid)


It was the Doolittle Raid, the B-25 was named Mitchell.

Are you looking for the largest airplane flown from a carrier during WWII,
or the largest airplane operated from a carrier built during WWII?


  #8  
Old October 4th 05, 02:48 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew Robert Breen" wrote in message
...

De Havilland Sea Mosquito? IIRC they became operational from 'carriers
shortly before VJ day. Must have been quite a prospect for deck
handling.


I don't think an operational Sea Mosquito was ever operated on a carrier.
De Havilland modified a Mosquito FB.VI with an arresting hook, the necessary
fuselage and landing gear beefup for carrier trials which were conducted in
March 1944. The trials were satisfactory and another FB.VI was modified
with folding wings. These two aircraft served as prototypes of the Sea
Mosquito, but the first Sea Mosquito wouldn't fly until some three months
after the war ended. Only fifty Sea Mosquitoes were built, they were in
operational service less than a year and operated from land bases.


  #9  
Old October 4th 05, 03:08 PM
Andrew Robert Breen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Andrew Robert Breen" wrote in message
...

De Havilland Sea Mosquito? IIRC they became operational from 'carriers
shortly before VJ day. Must have been quite a prospect for deck
handling.


I don't think an operational Sea Mosquito was ever operated on a carrier.
De Havilland modified a Mosquito FB.VI with an arresting hook, the necessary
fuselage and landing gear beefup for carrier trials which were conducted in
March 1944. The trials were satisfactory and another FB.VI was modified
with folding wings. These two aircraft served as prototypes of the Sea
Mosquito, but the first Sea Mosquito wouldn't fly until some three months
after the war ended. Only fifty Sea Mosquitoes were built, they were in
operational service less than a year and operated from land bases.


You're right, of course. I ought to have checked before posting. My
bad..

--
Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
  #10  
Old October 4th 05, 05:04 PM
R Leonard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Syd Bottomley did two traps and two launches in a PBJ on Shangri-La in
November 1944.

Rich

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.