A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 18th 04, 11:51 AM
Aardvark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident

SUNDAY'S Plane Crash Is Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident
KOMO - Seattle,WA,USA
.... Ghyrn Loveness, 20, was flying a Cessna 170 when he crashed. KOMO 4
News has learned this is the second fatal plane crash Loveness has been
involved in. ...
http://www.komotv.com/stories/31286.htm

  #2  
Old May 18th 04, 02:02 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the *auto-pilot*?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #3  
Old May 18th 04, 03:40 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:rPnqc.73665$iF6.6195912@attbi_s02...
Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the

*auto-pilot*?

The way I read it is that he had turned on his autopilot and was looking at
a map when the mid-air happened.

As for flying without the engine attached, well, we see once again why
eyewitness accounts are unreliable. However, the photo does show an airplane
with the whole cowling and engine missing. Perhaps they were ripped off when
he hit the power lines.

It seems unfair to say that this is the pilot's second fatal accident when
his plane suffered a power failure and he was not even at the controls when
it crashed. The NTSB report of that crash says:

NTSB Identification: SEA03FA124
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Friday, July 04, 2003 in East Wenatchee, WA
Aircraft: Beech A36TC, registration: N279WP
Injuries: 1 Fatal, 1 Serious, 1 Minor.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors.
Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been
completed.

On July 4, 2003, approximately 1330 Pacific daylight time, a Beech A36TC,
N279WP, impacted the terrain during an attempted forced landing in hilly
terrain about three miles northwest of Pangborn Memorial Airport, Wenatchee,
Washington. The commercial pilot received fatal injuries, one of his
passengers received serious injuries, and the other passenger received minor
injuries. The aircraft, which was owned and operated by the pilot, sustained
substantial damage. The 14 CFR Part 91 personal pleasure flight, which
departed Dryden Airport, Cashmere, Washington, about 10 minutes earlier, was
being operated in visual meteorological conditions. No flight plan had been
filed. There was no report of an ELT activation.

According to the back seat passenger, the pilot took off from Cashmere with
the intention of flying to Wenatchee in order to refuel before heading back
to the Puget Sound area. While the aircraft was about four miles from the
Wenatchee Airport and maneuvering to enter the pattern, the engine suffered
a sudden loss of all power. The pilot then attempted to land in a wheat
field growing on a flat area in the hilly terrain. Although his initial
touchdown was successful, he was not able to get the aircraft stopped before
it reached the end of the field, whereupon it slid into the ravine and
impacted the ravine's far wall.


  #4  
Old May 18th 04, 03:43 PM
Richard Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:02:15 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the *auto-pilot*?


Good question. The report was ambiguous. It could be interpreted
that he was putting on the autopilot just prior to the crash.
Depending on how you interpret what was written, the autopilot could
have saved his butt or contributed to the cause of the accident by
providing a distraction. The investigation will sort it all out, I'm
sure.
Rich Russell
  #5  
Old May 18th 04, 04:04 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Russell" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:02:15 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the

*auto-pilot*?

Good question. The report was ambiguous. It could be interpreted
that he was putting on the autopilot just prior to the crash.
Depending on how you interpret what was written, the autopilot could
have saved his butt or contributed to the cause of the accident by
providing a distraction. The investigation will sort it all out, I'm
sure.


Sounds a bit like this one where the pilot was looking down (to engage the
autopilot??) and had a collision.
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...11X09798&key=1



  #6  
Old May 18th 04, 04:22 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Richard Russell" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:02:15 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer

pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the

*auto-pilot*?

Good question. The report was ambiguous. It could be interpreted
that he was putting on the autopilot just prior to the crash.
Depending on how you interpret what was written, the autopilot could
have saved his butt or contributed to the cause of the accident by
providing a distraction. The investigation will sort it all out, I'm
sure.


Sounds a bit like this one where the pilot was looking down (to engage the
autopilot??) and had a collision.
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...11X09798&key=1


That is a different accident. The accident in question here happened near
Tenino, WA on Sunday and involved a collision between a Cessna 210 and a
170.


  #7  
Old May 18th 04, 04:32 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aardvark wrote in message ...
SUNDAY'S Plane Crash Is Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident
KOMO - Seattle,WA,USA
... Ghyrn Loveness, 20, was flying a Cessna 170 when he crashed. KOMO 4
News has learned this is the second fatal plane crash Loveness has been
involved in. ...
http://www.komotv.com/stories/31286.htm


Great, now he gets to vote in Chicago....
  #8  
Old May 18th 04, 04:39 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Aardvark" wrote in message
...
SUNDAY'S Plane Crash Is Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident
KOMO - Seattle,WA,USA
... Ghyrn Loveness, 20, was flying a Cessna 170 when he crashed. KOMO 4
News has learned this is the second fatal plane crash Loveness has been
involved in. ...
http://www.komotv.com/stories/31286.htm


Another blasted tailwheel pilot that can't fly. No doubt he thinks all the
flight instructors are incompetent.





(For the sarcasm impaired -- no, I am not serious. I'm glad he was able to
walk away and I have no idea whose fault the accident was or what the guy
thinks.)


  #9  
Old May 18th 04, 04:42 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Richard Russell" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:02:15 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer

pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with

his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the

*auto-pilot*?

Good question. The report was ambiguous. It could be interpreted
that he was putting on the autopilot just prior to the crash.
Depending on how you interpret what was written, the autopilot could
have saved his butt or contributed to the cause of the accident by
providing a distraction. The investigation will sort it all out, I'm
sure.


Sounds a bit like this one where the pilot was looking down (to engage

the
autopilot??) and had a collision.
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...11X09798&key=1


That is a different accident. The accident in question here happened near
Tenino, WA on Sunday and involved a collision between a Cessna 210 and a
170.


I didn't say it was the SAME accident, just SIMILAR. (i.e., distracted while
engaging the autopilot).



  #10  
Old May 18th 04, 04:42 PM
Bela P. Havasreti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:02:15 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

Typical eye-witness faux-pas.... (BS)

But the engine, mount & cowling did depart the aircraft in flight.
The engine was found 1000+ feet from the rest of the airplane.

Bela P. Havasreti

Aside from the fact that this lad should perhaps find a safer pastime...

Did he really land his Cessna 170, after a mid-air collision, with his
engine no longer attached to the airframe -- by turning on the *auto-pilot*?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.