If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, Politics! It takes patience and lobbying to make a change. First you
need to form a supportive base that will aid in promoting your view of what the club should be - with reasoned arguments. Try to get like minded members into officer positions. Most clubs, I believe are run in a fairly democratic manner, so you need votes. Know your clubs by-laws and rules of conduct regarding voting and decision making. It can get personal so be prepared. It is a shame the club does not promote the SSA badge program for non owners. Mike "mat Redsell" wrote in message news:0LE6d.36$lf2.15@trnddc09... I have been very concerned about our club, which discourages cross country in club gliders. My thought is that purpose of soaring is cross country and if one just concentrates on flying above the airport then ones member ship tends to end when you have your license. We have many airports withing a 15 miles radius and many flat fields with always an option of landing in cut hay fields, harvested bean and corn fields etc. There is no lack of good landing fields or airports. Our board is composed of pilots who do not go cross country and surprisingly none of the instructors have flown cross country ( there may be an exception.... but none I know of have gone recently). And I am not allowed to teach since I insist on wearing a parachute for both student and instructor. ( I have in the past provided a chute for the student). The thought at our club is that if you want to go cross country you buy your own ship... a rasther harsh reality for many pilots. I have found surprisingly ( tonque in cheek here) that if there is lift at the airport we fly from there is usually lift 10 to 50 miles away but I have no way of convincing our board members. Can anyone give me some ideas.... and do other clubs let their ships for short cross country runs? -mat -- Marske Flying Wings http://www.continuo.com/marske |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Some time ago X-C requirements for instructors in France were even more
stringent : 1000 km XC including at least 1 300-km flight. Asbjorn Hojmark a écrit: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:01:57 +0200, Bruce Greeff wrote: It is a requirement in South Africa - no silver C (at least one 50km XC) - no instructor brevet. Very simple. It's the same in Denmark: At least one Silver C distance for HI (sort of a 'helping hand' instructur, who can't sign anything important) and at least two flights over 100 km for the FI. -A |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In France there is a specific qualification for XC instructor, in addition
to basic instructor qualification. Pre-requisite is in-flight skills assessment + theoretical exam + 1000 XC experience in last 12 months + 2 week course. For XC pilots an XC qualification delivered by an XC instructor is required, with mandatory 8-hours, 3 flights, 1 outlanding etc. However XC is strongly promoted by the federation via a yearly pilots/club country-wide ranking based on your 5 longest flights. This helps because number of clubs are frightened by XC activity ... Jean "Marc Till" ] a écrit dans le message de ... Some time ago X-C requirements for instructors in France were even more stringent : 1000 km XC including at least 1 300-km flight. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"For Example John Smith" wrote
We are in the flat coastal plains and the club doesn't have a history of promoting XC--our instructor staff and club management attitude are much the same as you describe. What might be interesting to you is how we are CHANGING. And at what speed. When I joined that club, nobody had gone XC in a club ship in years - but things were changing. Club ships were going to go XC that season. There was a program being put in place. I even remember attending one of the meetings. Eventually I got tired of waiting for the club to change. I bought my own ship (an inexpensive metal one) and started teaching myself XC flying. I flew some XC, got my commercial glider, eventually got my CFIG, did some teaching, and even trained a CFIG myself. But I also bought a twin, got heavily involved in instrument flying, got my CFII, got heavily involved in instrument instruction, and sort of drifted out of soaring. As you might imagine, this is a process that took years. The club is still changing. Club ships will go XC next season. Michael |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I am amazed that some clubs dont actively encourage XC! In our club virtually
everybody flies XC as soon as they are qualified to do so. OK some people only do their 50km and never venture out of gliding range ever again. The single seater club aircraft fly cross country on every possible occasion and this year we have had 4 entered in regional competitions, 3 in national competitions and one competing in the European Championships. Note I said that these are club aircraft not private. We do get occasional damage from field landings (stone chips etc) but this is small price to pay. Everyone who is flying XC on a particular day either arranges their own retrieves or puts their name on the board for a mutual retrieve. Nigel |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I can only speak for the USA but here there is a minority with the idea that
gliding exists solely to support tow planes. The rag and tube taildragger tug drivers want glider pilots to support their hobby by falling out of the sky ASAP so they can fly another tow and log another takeoff and landing. This idea goes hand in hand with the preference for Schweizer 2-33 trainers. XC takes a glider away for the day with only one tow - no fun in that for the tug drivers. Really good XC pilots release at less than 1500 feet AGL which is even worse. No XC means more tows. Bill Daniels "OscarCVox" wrote in message ... I am amazed that some clubs dont actively encourage XC! In our club virtually everybody flies XC as soon as they are qualified to do so. OK some people only do their 50km and never venture out of gliding range ever again. The single seater club aircraft fly cross country on every possible occasion and this year we have had 4 entered in regional competitions, 3 in national competitions and one competing in the European Championships. Note I said that these are club aircraft not private. We do get occasional damage from field landings (stone chips etc) but this is small price to pay. Everyone who is flying XC on a particular day either arranges their own retrieves or puts their name on the board for a mutual retrieve. Nigel |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
It's a real pleasure to have a good tuggie up front, usually a glider pilot
with some hours to his name. He'll know right away just how good you are and will crank the tug around into a thermal if a good one presents itself. This season I had 3 aerotows tows where I released at or just below 1000' AGL, one of which was at no more than about 500' AGL. During a right hand turnout from the initial liftoff in Spain we flew into a real stonker. The tug climbed high as it flew into the core and I simply could not catch him. I held on just long enough for the vario to confirm that it was 'off the clock' pulled the plug and left the tug to complete a right hand circuit and land. I got charged a cable break price for that one, it probably lasted only about 1min 30 secs start to off tow. Ian "Bill Daniels" wrote in message news:1Bg7d.150967$MQ5.46505@attbi_s52... I can only speak for the USA but here there is a minority with the idea that gliding exists solely to support tow planes. The rag and tube taildragger tug drivers want glider pilots to support their hobby by falling out of the sky ASAP so they can fly another tow and log another takeoff and landing. This idea goes hand in hand with the preference for Schweizer 2-33 trainers. XC takes a glider away for the day with only one tow - no fun in that for the tug drivers. Really good XC pilots release at less than 1500 feet AGL which is even worse. No XC means more tows. Bill Daniels "OscarCVox" wrote in message ... I am amazed that some clubs dont actively encourage XC! In our club virtually everybody flies XC as soon as they are qualified to do so. OK some people only do their 50km and never venture out of gliding range ever again. The single seater club aircraft fly cross country on every possible occasion and this year we have had 4 entered in regional competitions, 3 in national competitions and one competing in the European Championships. Note I said that these are club aircraft not private. We do get occasional damage from field landings (stone chips etc) but this is small price to pay. Everyone who is flying XC on a particular day either arranges their own retrieves or puts their name on the board for a mutual retrieve. Nigel |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"MK" wrote in message ...
Ah, Politics! It takes patience and lobbying to make a change. First you need to form a supportive base that will aid in promoting your view of what the club should be - with reasoned arguments. Try to get like minded members into officer positions. Most clubs, I believe are run in a fairly democratic manner, so you need votes. Know your clubs by-laws and rules of conduct regarding voting and decision making. It can get personal so be prepared. It is a shame the club does not promote the SSA badge program for non owners. Mike "mat Redsell" wrote in message news:0LE6d.36$lf2.15@trnddc09... I have been very concerned about our club, which discourages cross country in club gliders. My thought is that purpose of soaring is cross country and if one just concentrates on flying above the airport then ones member ship tends to end when you have your license. We have many airports withing a 15 miles radius and many flat fields with always an option of landing in cut hay fields, harvested bean and corn fields etc. There is no lack of good landing fields or airports. Our board is composed of pilots who do not go cross country and surprisingly none of the instructors have flown cross country ( there may be an exception.... but none I know of have gone recently). And I am not allowed to teach since I insist on wearing a parachute for both student and instructor. ( I have in the past provided a chute for the student). The thought at our club is that if you want to go cross country you buy your own ship... a rasther harsh reality for many pilots. I have found surprisingly ( tonque in cheek here) that if there is lift at the airport we fly from there is usually lift 10 to 50 miles away but I have no way of convincing our board members. Can anyone give me some ideas.... and do other clubs let their ships for short cross country runs? -mat -- Marske Flying Wings http://www.continuo.com/marske Parachutes- don't fly without them. They seem to be just an expensive piece of fabric to sit on, but when you need it....is there for you. And only for you. And if someone calls you "sissy", well...I'd rather be a "sissy" then dead. Plain and simple. In addition, if you fly with parachute on your back, you are more comfortable in flight. And that opens whole different perspective for you as a pilot of a sailplane.... Now, if your club board members are not permitting XC, get rid of them...if you can't, change clubs. Not permitting XC is the most stupid thing...it teaches the pilot art of navigation, decision making, much better weather analysis and interpretation, your skills are becoming sharper, etc. When you fly around your airport don't you know where the lift is? So, if you going low you fly to known to everybody spot, you go up and wander around the neighborhood....sounds familiar? All power to you for trying to change the club (stupid) rules. Promote XC, it is good for every pilot...and then comes the contest. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"MK" wrote in message ...
Ah, Politics! It takes patience and lobbying to make a change. First you need to form a supportive base that will aid in promoting your view of what the club should be - with reasoned arguments. Try to get like minded members into officer positions. Most clubs, I believe are run in a fairly democratic manner, so you need votes. Know your clubs by-laws and rules of conduct regarding voting and decision making. It can get personal so be prepared. It is a shame the club does not promote the SSA badge program for non owners. Mike "mat Redsell" wrote in message news:0LE6d.36$lf2.15@trnddc09... I have been very concerned about our club, which discourages cross country in club gliders. My thought is that purpose of soaring is cross country and if one just concentrates on flying above the airport then ones member ship tends to end when you have your license. We have many airports withing a 15 miles radius and many flat fields with always an option of landing in cut hay fields, harvested bean and corn fields etc. There is no lack of good landing fields or airports. Our board is composed of pilots who do not go cross country and surprisingly none of the instructors have flown cross country ( there may be an exception.... but none I know of have gone recently). And I am not allowed to teach since I insist on wearing a parachute for both student and instructor. ( I have in the past provided a chute for the student). The thought at our club is that if you want to go cross country you buy your own ship... a rasther harsh reality for many pilots. I have found surprisingly ( tonque in cheek here) that if there is lift at the airport we fly from there is usually lift 10 to 50 miles away but I have no way of convincing our board members. Can anyone give me some ideas.... and do other clubs let their ships for short cross country runs? -mat -- Marske Flying Wings http://www.continuo.com/marske Parachutes- don't fly without them. They seem to be just an expensive piece of fabric to sit on, but when you need it....is there for you. And only for you. And if someone calls you "sissy", well...I'd rather be a "sissy" then dead. Plain and simple. In addition, if you fly with parachute on your back, you are more comfortable in flight. And that opens whole different perspective for you as a pilot of a sailplane.... Now, if your club board members are not permitting XC, get rid of them...if you can't, change clubs. Not permitting XC is the most stupid thing...it teaches the pilot art of navigation, decision making, much better weather analysis and interpretation, your skills are becoming sharper, etc. When you fly around your airport don't you know where the lift is? So, if you going low you fly to known to everybody spot, you go up and wander around the neighborhood....sounds familiar? All power to you for trying to change the club (stupid) rules. Promote XC, it is good for every pilot...and then comes the contest. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Daniels wrote:
...here [in the USA] there is a minority with the idea that gliding exists solely to support tow planes. [....] Really good XC pilots release at less than 1500 feet AGL which is even worse. No XC means more tows. Au Contraire, Buttercup. There is nothing more boring than dragging some poor schmuck to 3500' agl so he can stay up for an extra 5 minutes. In reality, we tow pilots can hardly wait to get back down for the next pattern-tow so we can maximize our exposure to the more dangerous phase of the sport. It's the self-sacrficial aspect that draws us to those beloved "rag and tube" tugs. And if someone builds a better tug, you'll probably complain that the tows have become too expensive. Your nemeses are no doubt substantially in the minority, and not very good at accounting, either. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cross country time | clyde woempner | Owning | 5 | February 2nd 05 10:36 PM |
Cross Country Logging time | Jim | Piloting | 14 | April 21st 04 09:58 PM |
ADV: World Air Power Journal collection on Ebay | Jeb Hoge | Military Aviation | 1 | March 16th 04 02:18 AM |
US cross country flight | S Narayan | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 7th 04 02:58 PM |
US cross country flight | S Narayan | Piloting | 0 | January 7th 04 02:58 PM |