A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 9th 06, 01:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

I seem to recall a homebuilt that didn't succeed in the market. 4
landing gear, V8 engine, swing away tail, fuselage made to haul 1000
pounds of 4x8 plywood. Not ideal for this mission, but a good start.
Can't remember the name.

Or, there's this - http://www.coastcomp.com/av/fltline2/avion.htm

  #22  
Old March 9th 06, 02:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

On 8 Mar 2006 17:22:52 -0800, "Richard Riley" wrote:

I seem to recall a homebuilt that didn't succeed in the market. 4
landing gear, V8 engine, swing away tail, fuselage made to haul 1000
pounds of 4x8 plywood. Not ideal for this mission, but a good start.
Can't remember the name.


O'Neill Magnum.

And you a fellow Irishman.... :-)

Ron Wanttaja


  #23  
Old March 9th 06, 06:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

Well, you know what all that whisky does to one's memory.... But I
think that's the one.

  #24  
Old March 10th 06, 12:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

("Ron Wanttaja" wrote)
O'Neill Magnum.



Not much info...
http://www.aerofiles.com/_o.html
Scroll down to O'Neil


MontblackIrish
  #25  
Old March 10th 06, 12:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

("Rory" wrote)
Twin engine cannot be operated under LSA. Read the reg. Single engine
only.



Part 103 doesn't have such a burdensome reg ...or that LSA turbine
prohabition, either. :-)


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z1E4215CC
CriCri (twin) at airliners.net

http://www.amtjets.com/gallery_real_plain.html
Turbine powered CriCri
(170 Kg is Gross Weight)


Montblack
"Heck, I'M not 103 legal."

  #26  
Old March 10th 06, 01:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

Montblack wrote:
("Rory" wrote)

Twin engine cannot be operated under LSA. Read the reg. Single engine
only.




Part 103 doesn't have such a burdensome reg ...or that LSA turbine
prohabition, either. :-)


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z1E4215CC
CriCri (twin) at airliners.net

http://www.amtjets.com/gallery_real_plain.html
Turbine powered CriCri
(170 Kg is Gross Weight)


Montblack
"Heck, I'M not 103 legal."


more than five gallons of gas, Monty?
or over stall speed?

cri-cri is cute, but at 360 pounds and 36 pounds thrust
I bet acceleration is a bit underwhelming...

  #27  
Old March 10th 06, 01:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

Montblack wrote:

("Rory" wrote)

Twin engine cannot be operated under LSA. Read the reg. Single engine
only.




Part 103 doesn't have such a burdensome reg ...or that LSA turbine
prohabition, either. :-)


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z1E4215CC
CriCri (twin) at airliners.net

http://www.amtjets.com/gallery_real_plain.html
Turbine powered CriCri
(170 Kg is Gross Weight)


Montblack
"Heck, I'M not 103 legal."


doh!
360 pounds and 36 KILOS thrust!

That night be more fun after all.

  #28  
Old March 10th 06, 02:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

("Richard Lamb" wrote)
Montblack
"Heck, I'M not 103 legal."


more than five gallons of gas, Monty?



Yeah... that's it. Sure, that gas thing. Yup, too much gas.

No other 103 references here folks. Move along now...


Montblack
  #29  
Old March 10th 06, 02:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Roadable Aircraft ... What about this?

("Montblack" wrote)
Not much info...
http://www.aerofiles.com/_o.html
Scroll down to O'Neil



I just noticed something on this page:
http://www.aerofiles.com/_o.html

The bottom of the page is clever and, and, and ...kind of cute

....in a manly airplane kind of way. :-)


Montblack
Hadn't seen that design employed before.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.