If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
On May 23, 9:24*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: You don't believe that others can form opinions about you from what you post? Opinions don't change FACTS. Let me refresh your memory. FACT You are not a CGI. FACT You NEVER FLEW in a real plane as PIC FACT. You are lying and misrepresent yourself as a pilot. In light of the above FACT You are NOT a credible source to even comment on flying in the real world. |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
|
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: It is no more a "personal attack" than saying you live in France. Calling someone delusional has negative connotations that saying someone lives in France does not, however baseless the accusation. You have demonstrated that you are delusional on many occasions so my saying that is a simple statement of fact. That the fact has negative connotations is your problem, not mine. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
|
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
On Sun, 23 May 2010 04:21:19 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:
*TIC, TOC, TIC...Game's over* -- tick tock tick, little prick with a nervous tick. cum here and suck my dick. Don't think so. -- Live To Spend It |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: You have demonstrated that you are delusional on many occasions so my saying that is a simple statement of fact. No matter how many times you assert this, it will not become reality. Denying reality is delusional. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
On May 22, 7:44*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: ALREADY HAVE IN THIS THREAD No, you have not. Most "corrections" I see in this group are in fact expressions of conflicting opinions. Since my facts are almost invariably on the money, corrections of those are neither necessary nor forthcoming, although on some occasions I've had people "correct" things that weren't wrong, despite overwhelming evidence that they were right. Emotion is a powerful distorter of reason and judgment. The fact that you cant ( or more likely wont) ever be convinced you are wrong does not mean that others cant see your errors. I can still recall you trying to tell a physical chemist that the ideal gas law doesnt apply in the atmosphere, simply because the gas isnt contained in a piston like the drawings in your high school chemistry book, And no amount of explanation could convince you otherwise. Ignorance and pride are powerful distorters of reason and judgement also. Ignorance comes from sitting in a lounge chair thinking you can understand things as well as people who do them. Anyone can state " my facts are invariably on the money" but people whose facts are invariably on the money, are normally people in high demand for their skills and knowledge. They invariably dont work for peanuts, or beg for handouts. |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
terry writes:
The fact that you cant ( or more likely wont) ever be convinced you are wrong does not mean that others cant see your errors. That can work both ways. I can still recall you trying to tell a physical chemist that the ideal gas law doesnt apply in the atmosphere, simply because the gas isnt contained in a piston like the drawings in your high school chemistry book, And no amount of explanation could convince you otherwise. That's because it is true. That's why you can't use the gas laws as-is for the atmosphere. The atmosphere is held against the Earth by gravity, not confinement. That's why pressure and temperature gradients exist with altitude, which would not be the case if confinement held the atmosphere together. Anyone can state " my facts are invariably on the money" but people whose facts are invariably on the money, are normally people in high demand for their skills and knowledge. They invariably dont work for peanuts, or beg for handouts. Actually, I've met a number of highly competent people who are vastly underutilized in their work. Often extroversion and brown-nosing are more important than qualifications. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
On May 26, 3:40*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
terry writes: The fact that you cant ( or more likely wont) ever be convinced you are wrong does not mean that others cant see your errors. That can work both ways. I can still recall you trying to tell a physical chemist that the ideal gas law doesnt apply in the atmosphere, simply because the gas isnt contained in a piston like the drawings in your high school chemistry book, And no amount of explanation could convince you otherwise. That's because it is true. That's why you can't use the gas laws as-is for the atmosphere. The atmosphere is held against the Earth by gravity, not confinement. That's why pressure and temperature gradients exist with altitude, which would not be the case if confinement held the atmosphere together. typical mx obfuscation and twisting of the argument to avoid ever admitting you are just wrong. the chemist, who also happened to be a pilot, was telling you that they could use the measured temperature and pressure at an airfield to calculate the air density at the airfield from the ideal gas law, now explain again what gravity and temperature gradients with altitude have to do with that? ( thats really a rhetorical question) Anyone can state " my facts are invariably on the money" but people whose facts are invariably on the money, are normally people in high demand for their skills and knowledge. They invariably dont work for peanuts, or beg for handouts. Actually, I've met a number of highly competent people who are vastly underutilized in their work. *Often extroversion and brown-nosing are more important than qualifications. And your qualifications are what ? ( since we are in an aviation forum, could you start with your aviation quals please please?) Terry Live to Earn it , Live to Do it. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Simulators
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:30:30 -0700 (PDT), terry wrote:
typical mx obfuscation and twisting of the argument to avoid ever admitting you are just wrong. Keep on arguing with him, two twits are better than one. -- A fireside chat not with Ari! http://tr.im/holj Motto: Live To Spooge It! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simulators | Birdog | Piloting | 33 | March 9th 09 11:46 PM |
PC IFR simulators | Nick Kliewer | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | November 2nd 06 09:16 AM |
Simulators | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | October 20th 04 09:12 PM |
IFR simulators | Tony | Owning | 8 | October 27th 03 09:42 PM |
IFR simulators | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 24th 03 03:53 AM |