A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Simulators



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old May 23rd 10, 07:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 838
Default Simulators

On May 23, 9:24*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:


You don't believe that others can form opinions about you from what you post?


Opinions don't change FACTS. Let me refresh your memory.

FACT You are not a CGI.
FACT You NEVER FLEW in a real plane as PIC
FACT. You are lying and misrepresent yourself as a pilot.


In light of the above


FACT You are NOT a credible source to even comment on flying in the
real world.

  #195  
Old May 23rd 10, 09:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Simulators

On Sun, 23 May 2010 04:21:19 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:


*TIC, TOC, TIC...Game's over*
--


tick tock tick, little prick with a nervous tick.
cum here and suck my dick.


Don't think so.

--
Live To Spend It
  #197  
Old May 25th 10, 09:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
terry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Simulators

On May 22, 7:44*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
ALREADY HAVE IN THIS THREAD


No, you have not. Most "corrections" I see in this group are in fact
expressions of conflicting opinions. Since my facts are almost invariably on
the money, corrections of those are neither necessary nor forthcoming,
although on some occasions I've had people "correct" things that weren't
wrong, despite overwhelming evidence that they were right. Emotion is a
powerful distorter of reason and judgment.



The fact that you cant ( or more likely wont) ever be convinced you
are wrong does not mean that others cant see your errors. I can
still recall you trying to tell a physical chemist that the ideal gas
law doesnt apply in the atmosphere, simply because the gas isnt
contained in a piston like the drawings in your high school chemistry
book, And no amount of explanation could convince you otherwise.
Ignorance and pride are powerful distorters of reason and judgement
also. Ignorance comes from sitting in a lounge chair thinking you can
understand things as well as people who do them.

Anyone can state " my facts are invariably on the money" but people
whose facts are invariably on the money, are normally people in high
demand for their skills and knowledge. They invariably dont work for
peanuts, or beg for handouts.
  #198  
Old May 25th 10, 06:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Simulators

terry writes:

The fact that you cant ( or more likely wont) ever be convinced you
are wrong does not mean that others cant see your errors.


That can work both ways.

I can still recall you trying to tell a physical chemist that the ideal gas
law doesnt apply in the atmosphere, simply because the gas isnt
contained in a piston like the drawings in your high school chemistry
book, And no amount of explanation could convince you otherwise.


That's because it is true. That's why you can't use the gas laws as-is for the
atmosphere. The atmosphere is held against the Earth by gravity, not
confinement. That's why pressure and temperature gradients exist with
altitude, which would not be the case if confinement held the atmosphere
together.

Anyone can state " my facts are invariably on the money" but people
whose facts are invariably on the money, are normally people in high
demand for their skills and knowledge. They invariably dont work for
peanuts, or beg for handouts.


Actually, I've met a number of highly competent people who are vastly
underutilized in their work. Often extroversion and brown-nosing are more
important than qualifications.
  #199  
Old May 25th 10, 09:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
terry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Simulators

On May 26, 3:40*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
terry writes:
The fact that you cant ( or more likely wont) ever be convinced you
are wrong does not mean that others cant see your errors.


That can work both ways.

I can still recall you trying to tell a physical chemist that the ideal gas
law doesnt apply in the atmosphere, simply because the gas isnt
contained in a piston like the drawings in your high school chemistry
book, And no amount of explanation could convince you otherwise.


That's because it is true. That's why you can't use the gas laws as-is for the
atmosphere. The atmosphere is held against the Earth by gravity, not
confinement. That's why pressure and temperature gradients exist with
altitude, which would not be the case if confinement held the atmosphere
together.


typical mx obfuscation and twisting of the argument to avoid ever
admitting you are just wrong.
the chemist, who also happened to be a pilot, was telling you that
they could use the measured temperature
and pressure at an airfield to calculate the air density at the
airfield from the ideal gas law, now explain again
what gravity and temperature gradients with altitude have to do with
that? ( thats really a rhetorical question)


Anyone can state " my facts are invariably on the money" but people
whose facts are invariably on the money, are normally people in high
demand for their skills and knowledge. They invariably dont work for
peanuts, or beg for handouts.


Actually, I've met a number of highly competent people who are vastly
underutilized in their work. *Often extroversion and brown-nosing are more
important than qualifications.


And your qualifications are what ? ( since we are in an aviation
forum, could you start with your aviation quals please please?)

Terry

Live to Earn it , Live to Do it.



  #200  
Old May 25th 10, 11:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ari[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default Simulators

On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:30:30 -0700 (PDT), terry wrote:

typical mx obfuscation and twisting of the argument to avoid ever
admitting you are just wrong.


Keep on arguing with him, two twits are better than one.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simulators Birdog Piloting 33 March 9th 09 11:46 PM
PC IFR simulators Nick Kliewer Instrument Flight Rules 20 November 2nd 06 09:16 AM
Simulators [email protected] Simulators 1 October 20th 04 09:12 PM
IFR simulators Tony Owning 8 October 27th 03 09:42 PM
IFR simulators Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 3 July 24th 03 03:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.